Preview

Opposing Argument: Abortion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Opposing Argument: Abortion
Opposing Arguments: Abortion
Introduction:
Why abortion is immoral by Don Marquis is the start of two discussions pertaining to whether abortion should be acceptable in our modern society. The argument, Marquis makes, is that abortion actually deprives the fetus’s “future-like-ours.” Many philosophers support Marquis’ belief by arguing that fetuses have their own possibilities; thus, killing fetuses is absolutely wrong (Marquis, 105). Nevertheless, there are also other philosophers who criticize Marquis’ view in order to prove that abortion is not immoral since the fetus has no right to live. One of them is Peter K. McInerney, who wrote Does a Fetus Already Have a Future-Like-Ours? McInerney demonstrates the fact that fetuses have little or no relationship to their own future; therefore, the belief that “a fetus has a right to life” fails (Brill, 419). In addition, to support McInerney’s argument, H. Skott Brill’s The Future-Like-Ours Argument, Personal Identity and the Twinning Dilemma provides us ideas along with different perspectives on why McInerney’s theory is a strong account against Marquis’s point of view on abortion. On the other hand, Marquis’s Brill’s Objection to the Future of Value Argument criticizes the conflicts between Brill’s premises in order to prove that his initial belief to abortion is consistently right. In this paper, I will present Brill’s and Marquis’s principal arguments and how they support their point of view.
The Future-Like-ours Argument, Personal Identity and the Twinning Dilemma
In the beginning of this article, H.Skott Brill summarizes the main idea of Why abortion is immoral by Don Marquis. The main idea is “if a fetus has a right to life then nearly all abortion are immoral” (Brill, 419). However, it does not mean that stopping “the means necessary for the continuation of the fetus life” is wrong (419). Brill continues providing the support for McInerney’s “personal identity objection” and addressing the issue of a fetus



Cited: Brill, H. Skott. "The Future-like-ours Argument, Personal Identity, and the Twinning Dilemma." Social Theory and Practice 1 July 2003: 419-30. Print. Marquis, Don. "Brill 's Objections to the Future of Value Argument." Social Theory and Practice 1 Jan. 2005: 105-14. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of abortion is a highly controversial issue in today's society, and various views are held concerning the morality of the procedure. Some people feel that abortion is simply cold-blooded murder, because it is their opinion that a 'foetus' is a human being from the moment of conception. However, others would argue that a foetus is merely insubstantial matter, dependant entirely on its mother's body for survival, with no real life of its own. It is for this reason that pro-abortionists support the woman's choice to undergo abortion. After all, why should something so small and insignificant, which is not yet human, be entitled to the same rights and privileges a real human has"…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they believe “Life is present from the moment of conception” (526). In Don Marquis’s essay, “Why Abortion is Immoral” he takes the position that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). The purpose of the essay is to go against the belief that “The anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument” (525). Abortions should be illegal because they are morally wrong except, in cases beyond our control.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is nothing more personal and private than your own body. Out of everything in this world, it is the one thing that you truly own and it is the one thing you have control over. By limiting abortion the government is quiet literally forcing itself into the most personal, private, and intimate part of your life. What you decide to do with your own body has nothing to do with the greater well being of society. Having an abortion effects one person and one person only, the person who is pregnant. Anti-choice proponents say that abortion is the murder of a child, but they refuse to acknowledge a multitude of scientific evidence that shows that a a cluster of cells is not its own being. It is contained within a human being, it cannot live…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two opposing viewpoints are very instructive. One label, “pro-life,” points our attention towards the fetus, while “pro-choice” emphasizes on the pregnant woman. Each of these moral issues explains different viewpoints for the principal focus of moral concern. These two moral viewpoints examines the issues of the moral status of the fetus, criteria of personhood (where one criterion is being conceived by humans), the rights of the pregnant women; the right to privacy, the right to ownership of one’s own body, the right to equal treatment and the right to self-determination, and the other moral considerations like the concerns of feminists about abortion, as well as abortion and…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pro-choice Arguments

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1)Making abortion illegal doesn't stop abortion, it just makes it less safe. The number of women getting abortions doesn't change, the thing that changes is that women die from having unsafe abortions. 78,000 women die every year from having unsafe abortions.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202. Print. This journal is written by a philospher by the name of Don Marquis. While this document is quit outdated it still plays an important role in today 's debate about abortion. It is used by pro-life activists when debating the reasons why they feel abortion is immoral. This journal is long and filled with great ideas to ponder about life, its meaning and signifigance to the world. Marquis has etched his name with this written journal in the never ending debate of wether abortion is right or wrong. I think this piece will be valuable to my essay in that it will give my audience a deeper perception than the current idea that abortion should be a womens choice.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to boldily autonomy and the clear distinction between a fetus and a rational, self-aware person, abortion is morally permissible practically whenever the mother chooses it, given it is done humanely. Most people would agree that in cases where the woman did not choose pregnancy, like rape, abortion should be morally permissible due to bodily autonomy and the immorality of asking someone to undergo psychological and physical trauma due to something beyond their control. This is supported by the Famous Violinist argument which explains that women, especially those who are pregnant due to rape, are not morally obligated to endure this immense sacrifice, even if it would be nice to do so (Singer, 1975, p.113-114). Whilst Thomson’s argument has fallen under criticism based on utilitarianism, these arguments are countered by Singer’s deconstruction of the Conservative Argument and its flawed perception that human life is inherently special, which demonstrates the moral permissibility of most abortions. The Conservative Argument’s premise that a fetus is an innocent human can mean two things: either the fetus is a person that has self-awareness and rational thought or a fetus is a member of the human species (Singer, 1975, p.117).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    298). If this position is accepted, abortion is morally permissible as fetuses do not satisfy the conditions for personhood and there is no loss of a future. However under this umbrella, infanticide, the act of killing an infant, is morally permissible as they do not meet the criteria to be considered a person and fetuses and infants are intertwined within the same category. Although the terms Warren has outlined is accepted, it can be agreed upon that infants do possess a valuable future (although they are not termed as persons). Infants have the potential to have experiences, enjoyment, achievement and other values that would have constituted a future and the same can be implied to fetuses. By claiming abortion is morally permissible, and since a fetus does not satisfy the terms of being a person, it is ultimately accepting that it is morally permissible to commit infanticide, as both agents are not persons. These actions rob both a future and a life if the liberal position is accepted. I will now provide a reason as to why the loss of future is not a loss of a life by analyzing the mother’s future (or lack…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In industrialized world, abortion is not a criminal offence until a series of law against abortion were passed during the nineteenth century. The proponent prohibition of abortion globally has stressed the medical dangers of abortion. Moreover, it is also argued that fetuses are human beings. Deliberate abortion is therefore considered a form of homicide crime (……..). In popular rhetoric in the USA, abortion issue is considered as a purely women’s right that helps them in maintaining their bodies. Therefore, if women possess the moral right to abort their unwanted pregnancies, the law should not prohibit them from practicing the act of abortion. However, the arguments for this right cannot entirely solve the moral issue of abortion. It is one thing to have a right and another to morally justify when exercising that right. Since fetuses are considered to have equal rights to life like any other person, women’s right to abortion should therefore be exercised only on extreme…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advantages Civil War

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No war has killed as many American men as the Civil War. This is because it was a war between ourselves. Leading up to the war were disagreements about slavery and Presidents and other things like that. The South on one side, and the North on the other. When Lincoln was elected, who the North wanted as President but the South didn't, all hell broke loose. The South attacked northern troops at Fort Sumter and thus began the Civil War. In this war the North had almost every advantage but still the war went on for 4 years.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Choice Arguments

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The topic of abortion has caused much attention.When the topic comes about there are two sided arguments; either you are pro-life or pro-choice. Pro-life supporters support that women should not have a choice to abort the child, and it constitutes murder.Pro-choice supporters say that women should have the right to carry the child or abort it. Unlike many other arguments however both parties agree their should be a restricted availability.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would it be like if you weren’t allowed to choose what happens to your future? Some women do not get the luxury of choosing for themselves due to some laws set and they do not get the option whatsoever. That should be different as women are the ones who carry the babies, not the ones who are voting against it. Even though the baby never had the chance to live life, women should have the right to choose what they want to do with their baby because it may be bad for the women herself to have to care of a baby, they may not be prepared for a baby, and we do not know their circumstances of the situation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion has been a heavily debated political, ethical, and moral dispute continuing for more than a decade after it was legalized in the United States in January 22, 1973. This decade long debate between “pro-life” activists and “pro-choice” activists usually stem from ones ethical and moral values of whether it is right to surgically or medicinally terminate a fetus and the extremes, like death of the mother, which could occur from the pregnancy. In this debate, I would view myself as a “pro-choice” activist because I firmly believe that abortion should continue to be legal to decrease the number of unintended mothers, broken or single parent families, and family poverty.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the past decades, women in America have been fighting for their rights. For example, on the 18th of August in 1920, women were granted the right to vote. Although women have gained many rights, they still today are fighting to keep their right to aborting a fetus within them. Many individuals see underlying issues with suppressing abortion. Abortion may cause more of an advantage than harm.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays