Older employees versus younger employees
EMPLOYERS SHOULD HIRE MORE YOUNG WORKERS IN THEIR COMPANY.
The process of recruiting employees into a company is vital as these human resources are viewed to be a strategic investment. The success of companies largely depends on its human resource. Of late, higher learning institutions are churning out an unending supply of fresh graduates that add to the competition in the job market. Yet, the question arises whether the employer should hire these younger workers or to select from the more senior group. I believe that younger workers should be hired.
Firstly, employers should hire young workers because they are fresh and energetic. Apart from the advantage of age, young employees are flexible, ready to learn and are generally more enthusiastic about their work in the hope of gaining experience while vying for promotion. Given the opportunity to put their ideas into practice, they would contribute towards the productivity of the company. Secondly, with a higher education, young workers are better qualified for the job. It cannot be denied that the changing world of business would require a workforce with greater technical skills, such as computer knowledge and e-business. In this respect, the older employees may be lagging behind since they belong to a different working experience. The third argument is that employers could save costs in hiring fresh graduates instead of paying more for more experienced workers. Seniority and the years of service rendered by the older employees would need to find its reward in a better pay package apart from higher positions in the corporate world. On the contrary, younger workers will start at a lower budget and help companies save costs in the human resource department.
An argument against hiring young workers is that they have less work experience compared to older workers. Needless to say, senior workers have the advantage here due to their many years of service and involvement in various job descriptions. A second
The process of recruiting employees into a company is vital as these human resources are viewed to be a strategic investment. The success of companies largely depends on its human resource. Of late, higher learning institutions are churning out an unending supply of fresh graduates that add to the competition in the job market. Yet, the question arises whether the employer should hire these younger workers or to select from the more senior group. I believe that younger workers should be hired.
Firstly, employers should hire young workers because they are fresh and energetic. Apart from the advantage of age, young employees are flexible, ready to learn and are generally more enthusiastic about their work in the hope of gaining experience while vying for promotion. Given the opportunity to put their ideas into practice, they would contribute towards the productivity of the company. Secondly, with a higher education, young workers are better qualified for the job. It cannot be denied that the changing world of business would require a workforce with greater technical skills, such as computer knowledge and e-business. In this respect, the older employees may be lagging behind since they belong to a different working experience. The third argument is that employers could save costs in hiring fresh graduates instead of paying more for more experienced workers. Seniority and the years of service rendered by the older employees would need to find its reward in a better pay package apart from higher positions in the corporate world. On the contrary, younger workers will start at a lower budget and help companies save costs in the human resource department.
An argument against hiring young workers is that they have less work experience compared to older workers. Needless to say, senior workers have the advantage here due to their many years of service and involvement in various job descriptions. A second