North Dakota Pipeline Research Paper
There are many controversies on the North Dakota pipeline, on whether or not it should be built. So should it rebuilt? Here are some reasons on why there are so many controversies. The Government wants to build on indian reservations, the risk of the pipeline breaking, and the possible jobs to build it. The Government wants to build on Indians reservations. The pipe line would run through a sacred burial ground. Also, it would run under a lake the tribe considers a crucial water source for them. The Dakota Access pipeline is a $3.7 billion project that would carry 470,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil fields of western North Dakota to Illinois, where it would be linked with other pipelines. The plaintiffs claim the tribe was not properly consulted before the US Army Corps of Engineers approved the pipeline project.
…show more content…
The American Indian tribe argues that a leak or spill could be ruinous. They say historical and cultural reviews of the land where the pipeline will be buried were inadequate. People also worry about catastrophic environmental damage if the pipeline were to break near where it crosses under the Missouri River. The jobs it would possibly bring to Americans and the money to farmers. Energy Transfer said the pipeline would bring an estimated $156 million in sales and income taxes to state and local. Though, far fewer permanent jobs to maintain and monitor the pipeline. State and federal agencies have approved the pipeline, and some farmers and ranchers have welcomed the thousands of dollars in payments that came with signing agreements to allow it to across their land. So, is the North Dakota Pipeline a good or bad decision? With the controversies going on today, there are many sides of it. Whether it should or shouldn't be built, or will it make the United States of America more independent? But overall, it has good and bad reasons and will continue to have controversies until it is
The American Indian tribe argues that a leak or spill could be ruinous. They say historical and cultural reviews of the land where the pipeline will be buried were inadequate. People also worry about catastrophic environmental damage if the pipeline were to break near where it crosses under the Missouri River. The jobs it would possibly bring to Americans and the money to farmers. Energy Transfer said the pipeline would bring an estimated $156 million in sales and income taxes to state and local. Though, far fewer permanent jobs to maintain and monitor the pipeline. State and federal agencies have approved the pipeline, and some farmers and ranchers have welcomed the thousands of dollars in payments that came with signing agreements to allow it to across their land. So, is the North Dakota Pipeline a good or bad decision? With the controversies going on today, there are many sides of it. Whether it should or shouldn't be built, or will it make the United States of America more independent? But overall, it has good and bad reasons and will continue to have controversies until it is