Problems/need The NCLB Act is not effective because of the current situation of state governments calling certain schools "failures" because of their low exam scores, thereby reducing funding to the school. If the federal government is funding the NCLB Act for after school programs, it would seem that it was funding a non-effective program. I have broken down the consequences as follows. -Low test scores, school gets reduced funding and put "under state review." -Teachers fired, less motive for students to stay in school. School's curriculum is ineffective. -Meaning more money would have to be spent on the NCLB Act for it to compensate the loss of the school's own after-school programs. -So failing a school, based on government standards, just to spend more on it? Digging their own trap hole.
Policy Proposals
Based on my understanding of the education that I have received and the changes that I have witnessed, there are many alternatives to the NCLB Act, some of which I shall explain below.
-Focus on strengthening the curriculum. Subjects should help student in the future. Introduction of GE courses in high school, instead of introducing GE courses in college.
If students get GE's in high school they can figure out their weaknesses and strengths early on in their lives and also figure what they want do with their lives and increase their chances of going to college instead of graduating with only a HS diploma.
-Use excess money from the NCLB Act to assist in creating their own after school programs.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This is an extension of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society program (Klein, 2015). Johnson’s heart was in the right place but after being tweaked so many times I think that government bureaucrats lost sight of the reason for the original act by Johnson. There was such a focus on competing with other countries that children truly got left behind. The government put so much pressure on schools for their students to perform well on testing that schools had no choice but to start teaching to the test and leave other ways of teaching lessons on the back burner. I was a representative on the school board for our school system here where we live, we had the discussion of NCLB many times. One thing that we had discussed about the NCLB is how mentally disabled students were to take the same testing as the other students, and the testing not taking into consideration that those students would never be able to perform to those…
- 468 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
On January 8, 2002, former president George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which attempted to improve school’s test scores and accountability. The Act set out to improve education. With the decline in test scores and the racial discrimination in schools, it was time for a change. The change came through the NCLB Act when it tried to fix the issues in schools and make a positive impact for the children. Even though under the NCLB Act some goals were met, overall, the act was not effective in teaching other subjects other than the subjects required, instilling character in our students, and maintaining the consistency of the standards for passing.…
- 1781 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Associated Press. (2013) tells readers about how the White house has passed a bill that replaced the No Child Left Behind Act that will give the states and their state government the ability to choose how they can improve their school and reduce federal involvement in their educational matters, so instead of the federal running the school it will be each state and their state government running the educational part of their schools.…
- 682 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…
- 1041 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It happen to set an accountability provisions set forth in the NCLB law. The goal was having every child make the grade on state-defined education standards by the end of the 2013-2014 school year. To reach that goal every state has developed…
- 1018 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
NCLB does provide for much needed innovation in education and allows parents unprecedented choice in the education of their children but it may jeopardize the success of traditional public schools, with such things as promoting charter schools. It provides a testing ground for innovative ideas and programs in education. However the amount of money needed to fund the charter schools serves relatively few students and spends money that could benefit more students in innovative programs within traditional public schools. This does however expand school choice in that it gives parents more direct control of the students ' education than previous generations have enjoyed. With expanding school choice it creates instability of funding that causes hardships and inability to manage finances and staffing needs from year to…
- 1526 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The premise of the No Child Left Behind Act is that every child has an equal opportunity for a good education. For this goal to be met, each state must bring 95-100% of…
- 1969 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This act has to be one of the best programs I have read about, In my opinion this is great even though some people feel if families can afford to pay for meals they should. That’s all great but truthfully these schools have been missing out on financial funding from the government because families that cannot afford to pay for lunch or breakfast do not fill out the proper paperwork. This is costing schools over 325,000 dollars in the local Boston area alone. These forms are usually invasive and families decide to not fill them out. There is also the pride factor of the Mom and Dad not wanting to depend on the government and pay for school lunches or pack their kids food. Thus, making it a burden on that kid not getting the nutrition needed since only 1% of packed lunches provide the proper nourishment a kid needs.…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After talking about the background of policy, and why this particular policy was needed at the time and what problems it was trying to solve, it is now time to talk about the actual policy of No Child Left Behind. The main point of No Child Left Behind was to level the playing field in every public school in the United States who were disadvantaged, including: students in poverty, minorities, students who were receiving special educational services, and those who spoke little no English (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). Based on this description, we can see that No Child Left Behind, was created to help those who ad…
- 1319 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
A policy such as this denies kids their fundamental rights as a student, and I view it as an equality problem. Depriving kids who do not have a B average or above of the opportunity to participate in after-school activities creates a caste system that would stigmatize students who do not make the mark. If this policy were in place now, I myself would not be able to participate in any activities, clubs, or sports due to my grade average. Those activities are the places students make friends and find a safe fun environment to socialize and express themselves in the stressful pressure of a high school day. Speaking from experience, without something to look forward to during or at the end of a six-hour school day of tedious lectures and clocks ticking at the pace of molasses, removing these activities would decrease the students’ desire to want to learn or even be in a school setting. This could then backlash and drive the cycle of bad grades.…
- 378 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
President Bush signed The No Child Left behind Act (NCLB) in 2001, and it was enacted in 2002. It is the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which itself was reauthorized in 1994. The NCLB expanded the role of the federal government in education and has become the pivotal point of public education, spurring debates amongst for anyone interested. The act is aimed at improving education of disadvantaged students by holding states, schools, and educators accountable for student progress. (Education Week September 21, 2004).…
- 1204 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
School is kind of a hard thing to go to. The work is good but them people that are around you there are bad influences. Some people are mean and some are friendly some even tell stories and try to copy your work. People that don’t like to do their own work is not going to get anywhere in life. The no child left behind actually came from the 21st century. Schools should not miss an AYP that is some like an inspection. If any school misses it and continues to miss it then it will be shut down completely. Obama also talked about the no child left behind program he thinks that’s an exhalent idea. He even made leadership changes for the people.The thing about no child left alone is to narrow or even close an achievement space in America. Trying to make it happen with everyone will be hard and will take a little time because some kids don’t listen. Kids will get mad about the classroom rules but it will make a difference. Some teachers can’t control kids like they would want to because that’s not there child. A teacher that has been teacher for a long time can only control the kids because either he/she have heard and seen it…
- 701 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Today a battle rages in the American public school systems, and it has nothing to do with guns! In fact, according to (add source here),The No Child Left Behind Act has left principals of all school districts trying to cope with a serious dilemma, to comply or to educate. Although this piece of legislation was born on solid principles and concepts and has some support still, the fact of the matter is that it has not held up to the standards that Americans want and need for our children and our future. An article posted by US Liberals on (add date) states that “in 2003 US 15-year olds ranked 24th out of 29 developed nations in math literacy and problem solving.” In order to inform ourselves about the current status of No Child Left behind it is important to go back to school ourselves and do our homework as citizens. In order to do this, we will first address the main topics within the No Child Left Behind Act, second, examine some current statistical information concerning the implemented act, and finally, review the costs, benefits and future ramifications of this pivotal legislation…
- 371 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Passing NCBS is a total wasting of federal money. The author of “The death and life of great American school system” tells us that one cannot fix the complex issue like; education s, with the money itself. Instead of introducing strength in the education system, another issued was developed which was, testing. Through NCLB the school reform program “testing” became the back bone of the education system and largely became a waste of federal taxes money.…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays