Preview

Monster O Brien Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monster O Brien Summary
O’Brien and Harmon: Is it Race?
Monster presents its audience with a unique experience: they get to decide the fate of the main character by being presented with the facts, before the judge presents the final sentencing. It is a story of racism and class and how that affects the judicial system. The idea maybe innocent until proven guilty, but in many cases of African Americans on trial, the sentence is often decided before the trial begins. This conflict of race not only applies to the person on trial and the judicial courtroom, but can find itself with the lawyers that defend them. At the end of Monster, Steve Harmon’s lawyer, Kathy O’Brien, turns away from Steve after he has been found innocent of murder. We, as the readers, are never
…show more content…
She gathers her papers and moves away as STEVE, arms still outstretched, turns toward he camera” (276). O’Brien literally tenses up her whole body; like she is afraid of his arms reaching out, that his blackness will consume and overpower her if she embraces him. She sees him as a man, not a boy; she sees differences and stereotypes and ignores his humanity. She, regardless of the jury’s decision, has decided he is guilty. Myer uses “pensive” to indicate that when she looks at Steve, there is some thought or conclusion she is making about her client, seemingly a look of terror or mistrust. But it is how Steve interprets it that is important: “When Miss O’Brien looked at at me, after we had won the case, what did she see that caused her to turn away? What did she see?” (281). Steve has already had feelings of worthlessness, and calling himself a “monster”. When a white female, who was supposed to be fighting for him, rejects his act of comfort and celebration, he immediately assumes that he sees what he sees: the “monster” inside of him. O’Brien, not once, believed her client was innocent. Her preconceptions of who he is overtake her ability to see past his skin color and clearly who he is, and whether he is guilty or not, he is still a teenager who obviously

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through out this book Sean and Charlotte O’Keefe provided advocacy for Willow in several ways. The most obvious way Charlotte provided advocacy for Willow was by suing Piper not because if she would have known sooner she may have changed her mind about Willow, but because she wanted the money for Willows sake. Charlotte wanted the money for Willow so she would not have to worry about anything especially medical expenses in her life. Before the lawsuit when they were in Disney Sean was outraged when the family was separated due to Willow slipping on a napkin in the Disney Park. Though the hospital, policemen and family services were just doing their job, Sean could not forgive and forget. This is started the uprising of the lawsuit. He wanted…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case takes place in a meeting between employees of the Florida Project for Human Justice at the Florida State Prison. Diane Epps a fifty-five-year-old Caucasian woman, Executive director, Joe Moran, the other lead attorney (only African American staff), Cynthia Sanders a petite 28-year-old Caucasian woman, the mitigation investigator, and an accountant, Jose Arnada, a thirty-four Mexican American man; the client, was sentenced the death penalty for a crime that he did not commit. Cynthia, the protagonist, is meeting with Diane and Joe to discuss ways to show Jose is competent to write his own appeal.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In writing his novel “Monster”, Walter Dean Myers used his experience to keep the judicial system relevant to his points while still realistic. Steve’s attorney, O’Brien, is honest about her role in the system to Steve, telling him, “My job is to make sure the law works for you as well as against you.” Instead of pretending to be crusading for a not guilty verdict, O’Brien tells the truth that she intends to help hunt down the truth both for and against Steve as an unbiased tool of the court. This means that she will insure that the jury’s predispositions do not change their verdicts, that the prejudice of the court doesn’t change the evidence given in court, and that the evidence against Steve is legitimate and/or nonexistent.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monster is the story about a 16 year old black boy named Steve Harmon from Harlem. Steve is on trial for a being a possible accomplice to a murder. The book begins with him in jail waiting for his trial to start. The story is written in screenplay format, due to Steve’s passion for filmmaking, along with Steve's journal writing which he does even in the courtroom. Steve writes this way to keep his sanity while being in prison during the trial. The majority of the story takes place in the courtroom. Steve is there with another defendant, James King, who has his own attorney. The events of the robbery unfold through the accounts of witnesses, attorneys and the participants. The book is about Steve's trial and whether he will be found guilty of felony murder…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s a beautiful moment when a mother sees her baby for the first time, but it can be quite overwhelming when her baby is born with a defect. Though some women don’t feel the courage to face the challenges of having an “abnormal baby”, others are willing to accept their child as he/she is. In this story, The Monster on Her Cheek, Rebecca Roland demonstrates the emotional struggle but choosing to embrace her child either way.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the issues involved in this case is the question of equal justice for all races in America. This is known to be a long-standing problem. The figures show that, on the whole, more minorities are convicted than white people. The two sides are that minorities commit more crimes and that the entire justice system from…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “My Creature From the Black Lagoon”, Stephen King compares and contrasts how children and adults handle fear, specifically in movies. His main argument is that the fear experienced by both adults and children is the result of a focus on the movie in which all emotions are fixated on the movies, and there is no logical thinking of the unrealism. In other words, their fixation allows for their imagination to dominate.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Walter Dean Myer’s novel Monster, a young, black 16 year-old, Steve Harmon is on trial for participating in a robbery and murder. Steve is innocent. Why? Ms. Petrocelli describes him as a monster. Why? She sees a young, black teenager. She stereotypes Steve. She assumes that he would commit the crime by his association with Bobo and James. To her he seems ready to confess. However, I see that Steve plays no part in the crime. He is not a “monster.”…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case had a total of three trials which lasted for about ten years. For the first trial Guy Paul was defended by a famous Toronto lawyer named Clayton Ruby (Guy). He was well known for facing tough criminal cases and his main defense in this trial was that the police did not build up a proper case before arresting his client, Guy Paul was then found not guilty but that trial was appealed and a second trial took place six years later. In the second case he was found guilty where he was against Neil McGuigan and was defended by Jack Kofshy (Guy). Unlike the first trial, Guy Paul was found guilty and was send to a lifetime in prison. Then 18 months into his prison sentence he was bailed out for $40,000 and had a third and final trial (Faryon). In this trial came new DNA evidence which proved that the seamen found on the underwear of Christine Jessop did not match Guy Paul’s DNA. With that in mind he was released of all charges and was let go. It took him 10 years and 3 visits to the court to be proven to not be guilty. It was known by him and his family that he was not guilty and that by the end of it all, the actual killer may not be found. This is a story which showcases a life of a man and his struggles against the Canadian justice system. Then finally after ten years he can live life knowing that he will no longer be judged of being a murderer. That is why his life can inspire people to…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom 302

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A very significant case in Cook County Courts was the Bridgeport case, known as a “heater” case because of the publicity that surround it, and the racial overtones (Bogira 181). The Bridgeport case involved three white teenagers, Michael Kwidzinski, Jasas, and Caruso that were accused of brutally beating two young black boys who were riding their bikes in the predominantly white neighborhood. The entire summary of the case, in Courtroom 302, was based around the fact that one of the boys, Michael Kwidzinski, was most likely innocent. The question then turns to the boy himself, Michael Kwidzinski; if he was innocent, why did hid then accept a guilty plea bargain?…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard of the court system acquitting someone that the public unanimously believed was guilty? Casey Anthony was a young mother who appeared outwardly to be a promiscuous woman who was living life with a rough childhood behind her. She appeared like a normal young person, trying to find herself, until she was accused of the murder of her two-year-old daughter, Caylee Anthony. An abundance of evidence, holes in her story, and the lack of concern in Anthony’s attitude lead the world to undoubtedly point fingers at her.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Famous football star and actor O.J Simpson was charged and arrested to stand trial after his ex-wife and her friend Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were found murdered outside Nicole’s apartment. MAny would say it was a clean cut case. But with a systemic rasicism problem with the L.A.P.D. Many believed the beloved football star with over 3,000 many loved may or may not have been guilty.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Monster written by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is convicted of a felony murder. As a member of the jury in my eyes Steve Harmon is not guilty. Three reasoning’s behind my conviction are that they have no evidence that he was there at the time of the crime, there is no probable cause to link him to the crime, and all the evidence says he was not there.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse, muddle or simply make-up to meet the needs of their fictional account. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, people often only have these fantastic accounts of the law to educate them to how it works “in the real world”. Consequently, the result is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that comprise our system. One of the main differences between fictional depictions of the court process and real thing is how a trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought forth to make statements. It is only rarely during these proceedings that anything exciting actually happens. But, if one were to believe the portrayal in movies and on television, it seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as “Sleepers” or “To Kill a Mockingbird”, make it seem as if shocking facts are revealed, surprise witnesses are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in every trial outcome. This simply…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve experiences an internal conflict regarding the way in which he wishes to be acknowledged. In chapter five, within Steve's journal, we see Steve experiencing this desire to be seen as a good person. "...What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I am on trial for? I didn't do nothing!..." (P. 115) Here he proclaims is innocence in his jorunal. In chapter three, Steve has to deal with some strong prejudicial stereotypes that may affect jurors. For example, O' Brien's words to him are "...You're young, you're black, and you're on trial. What else do they need to know?..." (P. 78-9). Here she is saying that the jury is pre-judging him before the case is over and nothing so far is evidence as to him being innocent. Steve's sense of his self-identity is further strained when he realizes that his father is no longer sure of who he is. When Steve asks his father if he believes that Steve did nothing wrong, the father is unable to give him the reassurance he…

    • 738 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays