Preview

Mode of Production

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mode of Production
In the writings of Karl Marx and the Marxist theory of historical materialism, a mode of production (in German: Produktionsweise, meaning 'the way of producing ') is a specific combination of: * productive forces: these include human labour power and available knowledge given the level of technology in the means of production (e.g. tools, equipment, buildings and technologies, materials, and improved land). * social and technical relations of production: these include the property, power and control relations governing society 's productive assets, often codified in law, cooperative work relations and forms of association, relations between people and the objects of their work, and the relations between social classes. Marx regarded productive ability and participation in social relations as two essential characteristics of human beings and that the particular modality of these relations in capitalist production are inherently in conflict with the increasing development of human productive capacities.
Significance of concept
According to Marx, the combination of forces and relations of production means that the way people relate to the physical world and the way people relate to each other socially are bound up together in specific and necessary ways. People must consume to survive, but to consume they must produce, and in producing they necessarily enter into relations which exist independently of their will.
For Marx, the whole 'secret ' of why/how a social order exists and the causes of social change must be discovered in the specific mode of production that a society has. He further argued that the mode of production substantively shaped the nature of the mode of distribution, the mode of circulation and the mode of consumption, all of which together constitute the economic sphere. To understand the way wealth was distributed and consumed, it was necessary to understand the conditions under which it was produced.
A mode of production is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Marx, although, believed the forces of production disenfranchised man from his ability to see nature in its grandeur. That is, nature in its beauty, has already existed in such form outside man's idealism and it is man's productive essence to work with the material around him that in turn recognised that beauty. Man`s natural work is warped by the unnatural forms of capitalist labour: the “superfluously coarse labours of life [make it so] its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them” (Thoreau, “Economy,” 2). Man’s drive is directed towards the desire of capital in “commerce” and “industry” (Marx, “Manifesto,” 210) which repurposes the labouring conscience of man’s “essence” (Ibid., “German Ideology,” 182) to the working “appendage of the machine” (Ibid., “Manifesto,”…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx shocked the world with his own publication, The Manifesto in 1848, which sharply contradicted the visions of Smith and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution (Heilbroner, 1999). Marx concepts of unification without social class for the good of all people were communicated and the birth of communism was realized. Unlike Smith, who believed that the division of labor increased productivity, Marx believed that labor becomes a commodity and power rested in the hands of those who controlled production (Armor, 1997). Marx believed that the pending Industrial Revolution would create havoc and confusion to the capitalists' society…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his writing of Estranged labour, Marx considers labour to be a conscious act, not just a physical. He compares the situations under feudal and capitalist societies. Through labour Marx believes, human beings perform three funcions: derive their subsistence and survival; establish a relationship with their product; use the productive labour in their lives. (sidvents, 2013)…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alex De Tocqueville Analysis

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels are well known for their contributions to socio-economics which was displayed in their writing of The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels wanted society to establish a classless system in which the proletariat would rise up over the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie represented the ruling class which had been established as a result of the failed system of feudalism in the 1800s. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie could rule only so long as it best represented the economically productive forces of society and that when it ceased to do so it would be destroyed and replaced and eventually this cycle would continue until there was a virtually classless society. In his writing Marx argues that the proletariat needs to overtake the bourgeoisie by means of a social revolution. He believes that due to Industrialism the proletariats have learned how to work together and will thus untie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The proletariats had become the productive class, even though they…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Marx’s view on trade union, the relationship of production in the Capitalism has two important sides, which is the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is the owner of market to produce products. Their goal is to increase their markets to have more money, surplus value, and wealth (Tucker, p.473). The proletariat is the worker who works for the bourgeoisie, but receive their wages based on their work (p. 473). Basically, workers produce the products using bourgeoisie’s material for the market.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ideology that arose out of the Communist Manifesto shows that the means of production are a cause of the relations of…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Marx: “Social class is fundamentally determined by one’s relationship to the means of production.”…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crisis and Capitalism

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marx believed he had provided a comprehensive account of the inner dynamics of capitalist social organization. According to those who understand him to have offered a complete crisis theory, Marx demonstrated that the particular form social investment takes under capitalism, c:v (constant capital : variable capital), works initially to accelerate, but latterly to strangle the long-wave development of mankind's means of production proportional to our labour power, M:L. Given that the advancement of M:L is the foundation of all material progress and thus social progress for Marx, proving that capitalism retards M:L is all the proof Marx needed that capitalism was becoming obsolete. The alternative to replacing capitalism would be for its ever-present crisis to drag humanity back to barbarism, destroying the gains that capitalism itself had created.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I am beginning with the famous quote from The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to frame a question to myself about Marx’s theoretical importance and its practical implication. I had my first encounter with Marx when I was in the 11th standard of my formal education. Since then the ghost of Marx has been impelling me to follow him (in one way or the other). I try to look at him, listen to him and learn from him but his immaterial body tells me less about the material aspects. I see through him but I cannot concretize him. May be that’s why I have always understood…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx believes that division of labor is a natural process, one that arises near spontaneously. Marx believes that as a nation develops its labor inevitably also becomes more divided. “How far the productive forces of a nation are developed is shown most manifestly by the degree to which division of labor has been carried. Each new productive force…causes a further development of the division of labor” (Tucker, 150). This division is what he finds to be problematic because it separates man from doing what he truly desires to do. In a highly specialized society, every individual must contribute to a facet of the society’s collective production; however, this input may be very minimal (depending on the degree of specialization). To whit, “As soon as the distribution of labor comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity” (160). Every man has his place and he is forced into it by the demands of society. However,…

    • 2363 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx: Conflict Theory The most influential socialist thinker from the 19th century is Karl Marx. Karl Marx can be considered a great philosopher, social scientist, historian or revolutionary. Marx proposed what is known as the conflict theory. The conflict theory looks at how certain social interactions occur through conflict. People engage in conflict everyday to gain more power then others in society. Karl Marx is known for studying the conflicts that occur between different classes. Karl Marx has introduced some radical ideas and theories to society through his writings. As the industrial revolution moved forward in society, so did the widening gap between class structures. Karl Marx studied the differences arising between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat people. The bourgeoisie are interested mainly in developing a capitalist society, using advanced methods of production. The bourgeoisie are the capitalist who own the factories, the products made in the factories, and controlled all the trade. The Proletariats or working class people have gained nothing in society but the thrill of their own labor. The Proletariats feel that they are treated poorly by the middle class society. They receive only enough in life to survive and have no chance of achieving a higher, class status. The bourgeoisie or middle class people in society were exploiting and degrading the Proletariat people. The Proletariats helped to improve production in society, which developed capitalism and helped it to grow faster. The Proletariats where not getting the wages they deserved for the labor that was accomplished. Capital gain was being made for the labor the working class provided, but there was still no way of improving status in society. The middle class was taking over and the rich were staying rich and the poor continued to be poor. Marx wanted the working class to stand up to the bourgeoisie and cause a class conflict. The idea was that if the working class revolted against the…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays