Preview

Meritocracy Fair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2968 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meritocracy Fair
SOC 189 - #1 Exam

1. Is meritocracy fair? Discuss the pros and cons of our achievement-oriented society. Does it give rise to a meritorious elite? Why or why not?
This country was founded on the principle that one’s status in society should be determined by your individual achievements, not by your conditions at birth. The idea is that we are all created equal, with equal opportunities, not results. The concept of meritocracy is essential to our ideas about American exceptionalism.
A benefit of using meritocracy is that people are getting credit and success for their achievements – which is something everyone have control over and can do something about. This also creates motivation to work hard among the people. When the people are
…show more content…

For each of the following five scholars, please describe their contribution to the study of elites:

* Laura Nader
There is now a lot of literature on the poor, the disadvantages, women, blacks and various racial/ethnic groups. There is very little literature of the top of the class people.
Laura Nadel encouraged anthropologists to ”study up” in the early 1970s by writing the book “Up the Anthropologist – Perspectives Gained From Studying Up” in 1969. This was a try to get anthropologists to think more about the study of the colonizes rather than the colonized, the culture of power rather than the culture of powerless. But not many followed her advice, sociologists who do research on elites can be counted on two hands.
Nader thinks it’s important to study elites because it is an important contribution to any study of inequality – whether down, sideways, or through (1972).

* Gaetano Mosca
Elite rule is not a moral question, but a social fact. Most societies are ruled by a small number of individuals – and Mosca called this minority the “ruling class”.

Mosca was the first to make a systematic distinction between elite and masses. He says that in every society, it appears two classes of people: A class that rules and a class that is
…show more content…

The culture of critical discourse (CDD) is characterized by speech that is relatively more situation-free, more context of field “independent”. is an historically evolved set of rules, a grammar of discourse.
The culture of critical speech requires that the validity of claims be justified without reference to the speakers societal position or authority.
The new class is the intellectual elite
Måten å snakke på, være på uten å nevne deg selv (være objektiv) – den nye eliten er intellektuell elite. 2 nye eliter I dag, intellektuell og teknologisk(beste I sitt felt). Når man argumenterer for sine måter å se verden på, gjør man det uten å snakke om sin egen måte å se verden på – det skulle være riktig, faktum, ikke ha noe om hvor man kom fra. Det er det man sier som betyr noe, ikke bakgrunn.
Ny måte å se på verden på, ikke ekskluderende men vil mingle med resten. Vil holde seg over andre ved eget språk, men slipper andre inn hvis de jobber hardt nok.

* Allegory of the cave
Plato. Who could be the just ruler of society? The just ruler has to know the truth, be responsible and willing to make sacrifices that need to be made to be the leader. The story: people in a cave looking at shadows – believing this is the truth and the real world, one is released and get to get out to see the


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As this promoted equality amongst Spartiates, it allowed them to compete and distinguish themselves in areas such as merit and honour rather than wealth…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 guided reading

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages

    equites: In ancient Italy, prosperous landowners second in wealth and status to the senatorial aristocracy.…

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dalton questions three myths that derive from Ragged Dick in Horatio Alger: we are all judged entirely on our merits, we are all given equal opportunity to gain those merits, and that merit will bring us success. If we are all judged by our merits, then “it suggests that success in life has nothing to do with pedigree, race, class background, gender... anything beyond our control” (Dalton 273). Dalton gives an example of the “best black syndrome”; Stephen Carter, a black man, earned second highest score in a scholarship test but gets “best black student.” Why must there be a category within a category? If a non-black student is addressed as the best student, and a black student is addressed as the best black student, what is it suggesting? That African Americans are not qualified to be considered as a regular, equal student? You are either the best or not all. This all goes to show that any way or form, we are all judged in society, affecting our…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the “reoccurring ways of speaking that challenge societies taken for granted assumptions and offer alternatives to prevailing discourse.”(Cox 68) Critical Discourse challenges socially dominant ideas or beliefs. The value comes from the timing in which I learned it. During election season, I was looking for someone to challenge many of the ideas that have become dominant over the past few decades. Unfortunately, neither candidate did much to appease that desire. For instance, sustainability was yet again a “boring” topic to our media and did not get the airtime and attention it warranted. However, it is encouraging that one can slowly start to see more of this Critical Discourse in other parts of the media. Conversely, Critical Discourse has caused massive division in the American community. People have used it to contest everything that does not agree with their dogmata, but the problem comes when one disagrees without knowing what they are fighting for. Discourse in America is more important now than…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given that a person's future should not be decided by factors outside of one's control, A meritocracy is a system where people are rewarded only on their efforts, if everybody is given…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociology: Black Like Me

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One argument made by Structural Functionalists is that society should be a meritocracy. People should be rewarded based on their abilities. (Class notes, SOCI 201, Winter 2010)…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine this: you're a teacher at a very prestigious school, with an exceptional group of students. Your students try their hardest, but some subjects of the curriculum are more difficult than others. Most kids do well on the tests, with a few slipping through the cracks, and the only thought you have is, “how will this affect my paycheck?” Merit pay, according to google, is the raise in pay based on a set of criteria set by the employer. Merit pay is nothing but pernicious to not only the teacher, but the student and school as well. Pay for performance leads to no improvement in teaching by stripping teachers of their motivation to teach. It also leads to a narrower curriculum and ultimately more test prep and money. Additionally, it ultimately leads to corrupt incidences, such as the situations in Atlanta, North Carolina and New York.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in America

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I agree with what Mantsios argues. He puts up a very compelling argument through the uses of studies and statistics. There is no doubt that those who are upper class have more chances to succeed. They have…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America: Myth of Equality

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To many, the Unites States serves as the ideal model of democracy for the modern world. Yet, how truly worthy is America of this status? Although it has been said that, "Equality is as American as baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie," one must be extremely critical when analyzing such a statement. By taking a historical perspective to the question of how "equal" American equality actually is, it is simple to recognize how problematic the "Land of the Free" mentality can be. The early America's most prominent thinkers have been sensationalized and given credit for developing a free and equal system. However, one can recognize that their manner of thinking was far from this idea of "all men are created equal" by critical examination of their literature.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Measure of Success

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Context for Critical Thinking and Writing. 8th ed. Eds. Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. 109-115. Print.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The importance of elites in high governmental positions- there has to be centralisation in a government, because according to… the majority are disorganised etc, and therefore wouldn’t be able to handle governmental policies. Also been said that the elites have more to lose if everything was to fail, and therefore their best interests are with the people. ‘the mass, who lack both the will and the capacity for political leadership’. P72…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khan has this idea that there is something inherently better about the elite, but he fails to recognize that the elite have stayed in power for so long primarily because they have been able to shape societal rules to best benefit themselves, and as the push for social equality strengthens, the idea of the elite class will shift towards a more merit based system. What makes someone elite in a specific field is actually their contributions to the field and how they use them to benefit society, rather than manipulate it.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays