Preview

Marbury V Madison

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1355 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marbury V Madison
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison has been hailed as one of the most significant cases that the Supreme Court has ruled upon. In this paper, I will explain the origins and background in the case, discuss the major Constitutional issues it raised, and outline the major points of the courts decision. I will also explain the significance of this key decision.
Origins and background of the case In the late 1700 's, John Adams was President. Adams was a member of the Federalist Party. The Federalists were in control of the Congress. Adams and other Federalists were Pro-British and the Republican Party was Pro-French. Thomas Jefferson led the Republicans. Federalists were worried that the influx of French into the country could become a powerful voting block. The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the Federalist controlled Congress to deal with this problem. The first of the laws was the Naturalization Act. This act required that aliens be residents for 14 years instead of 5 years before they became eligible for U.S. citizenship. Congress then passed the Alien Act, authorizing the President to deport aliens "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States" during peacetime. The third law, the Alien Enemies Act, allowed the wartime arrest, imprisonment and deportation of any alien subject to an enemy power.
The last of the laws, the Sedition Act, declared that any treasonable activity, including the publication of "any false, scandalous and malicious writing," was a high misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. The public was outraged and felt that this was a violation of their rights and that the government was becoming too overbearing. The Alien and Sedition Acts were a major reason that John Adams was not re-elected in the election of 1800. The people were very unhappy with the Federalist controlled government and this propelled the Republicans under Thomas Jefferson to win the election. There was a long lame



Bibliography: Primary Source Hamilton, Alexander. "Federalist Papers 78" June 14, 1788 Marbury v. Madison 1 Cranch 137 (1803). Secondary Sources Brainard, Rick. "The Judicial Mind of John Marshall: Nationalism" http://www.history1700s.com/page1757.shtml Barrus, Roger."Remembering John Marshall" 24 September 2005 The Washington Times Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Alien.html United States Constitution. Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Constitution.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What was the case: Marbury was a soon-to-be appointed justice of the peace when Adam’s presidency came to an end, resulting in his successor, Thomas Jefferson denying credibility of the appointments because they were not completed during the time of Adam’s presidency. Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, was asked to allow the commissions.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rituals and Festivals DBQ

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    • Sedition Act – 1798 law that allowed the prosecution of critics of the government.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intolerable Acts – After the Boston Tea Party, the British passed laws in the mid-1770s that were geared towards making a punitive example to other colonies. However, this did not work in favor of the British, but rather pushed the colonists closer to the…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case I briefed was the Marbury vs Madison case. The issue prosecuted was does Marbury have a right to the commission? Does the law grant Marbury a remedy? Does the Supreme Court have the authority to review acts of congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void? Can congress expand the scope of the supreme courts original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in article III of the constitution, and lastly does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction to issue units of mandamus. .…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Quincy Adams became a Senator as a Massachusetts Federalist in 1803, but soon broke away from his party. When the time came to vote on the buying of the Louisiana Purchase, Adams was the only member of the Federalist Party to vote in favor of the purchase. Even under the pressure of his fellow party members to conform to their views, Adams persisted in voting in favor of the purchase and in favor of other issues he thought to be right even when the rest of his party voted otherwise. In 1807, when Adams officially split away from the Federalists, Thomas Jefferson proposed an embargo against Great Britain in response to Britain's aggression towards American merchant ships. Although this would severely harm the Massachusetts economy and was in direct opposition to the Federalist desires, Adams helped Jefferson pass the law because it was the right thing to do in his mind. He stood by his beliefs even in times of adversity and even when the decisions he made ultimately ended up in his resignation to appease protesters.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking place in 1803, Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that set the standard of judicial review into effect. This means that any previous ruling on a case can be used as a precedent and can determine the verdict. The background of this case is all sorts of messy; when John Adams’ term was near its end, William Marbury and a few others were appointed as “justices of peace” for the District of Columbia, however their positions were never official. When Thomas Jefferson came into office, he told James Madison, the Secretary of State at the time, to deny Marshall and the others’ commissions, so Marbury and the others then sued Madison. John Marshall ruled in favor of Marbury however could not deliver his commission because the constitution conflicted with a legislative act known as the Judiciary Act of 1789. This case was significant because it served as the basis for Article III of the Constitution that sets the standards…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.Jefferson pardoned those who were in jail under the Sedition Act, and the government cancelled many fines…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America and France’s alliance had badly deteriorated after the French Revolution came to a completion in the late 1790s. In fear of a war with France and political turmoil surfacing in America, the Federal Congress passed four laws in 1798, signed by President John Adams, that came to be known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. These laws became a source of bitter controversy across the country, causing many to be furious and claim that the acts violated their personal liberties such as the right to free speech. Others, however, sought to defend the decrees and prove that they were constitutional, affecting only foreigners and those who were conspiring against the government. President Adams’s secretary of state, Timothy Pickering, argued that the laws would not have an effect on American citizens, so there was no need for concern (as stated in Timothy Pickering Upholds the Representative Laws.) James Madison, who would later become the fourth president of the United States, drafted The Virginia Legislative Protests in 1798, which declared that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional and would be abolished.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They countered it by adopting a narrow definition of the freedoms, drawn from English law. Here, the freedoms only existed prior to expression of an idea (Neuman 52). After one had spoken words or published information, people could however still be punished by government if proven to have defamed the government or king. Proponents argued that speech could naturally qualify to be seditious irrespective of the amount of sincerity or truth in it. Limitation of speech could also be justified basing on the priorities of the government at the time. For instance, according to the sedition act, there has to be a scandalous, false, or malicious element in the writing or speech.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to Marbury v Madison, the Supreme Court only received it's judicial powers through the construction of the Constitution and what legislature enacted. Marbury v Madison was known as the first judicial review conducted by the Supreme Court. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v Madison, it gave the court its power to review the acts of Congress and the Executive and to oppose any acts of the legislature and the Executive that violated Constitutional rights of all citizens in the United States. The Supreme Court began its rise to an equal branch of the government.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unconstitutional or not? First, we need to analyze the acts. The sedition act prohibited anyone to protest against the government, meaning that people at that time didn’t have any importance in the politics, they could only watch, without being able to express what they thought about the government. Everyone who criticized the government was punished. About the alien act, it provided that when war had been declared, all male from an enemy nation could be arrested. It also authorized the president to deport any non-citizen suspected of plotting against the government during either wartime or peacetime. Well looks like they were unconstitutional, seeing that they didn’t do anything to make the government better, they just messed up with the people…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays