Preview

Mandatory Drug Sentences Opposing Viewpoints

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
854 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Drug Sentences Opposing Viewpoints
This significance of this paper is to summarize and evaluate the debate on whether the petty drug offenders should be crowding our prisons, and also if some drugs should be legalized or at least decriminalized to reduce our prison populations. This issue is linked to Parenti’s discussion on drugs and the “War of Drugs”. Many of prisons in the United States are over crowded because of the petty offenders and the first time offenders that have minimum mandatory sentences, which are outrageous sentences for these offenders. Parenti notes that “a Federal Judge sentenced a man twenty two years for beating and elderly woman to death. A few hours later the same judge sentenced a 25 year old first time drug offender, father of two young children, to 55 years.” (p.124)

The articles that I have chosen to debate the positives and negatives of reducing mandatory sentencing for drug offenders. This aspect is a very controversial issue right now. Many people are getting sentenced to serve more prison time for petty drug offenses than for murder. These drug offenders are being charged with harsher punishments than that of mobsters, murderers, child molesters, and rapists. The first article is entitled “Prison overcrowding creates a Need for Prison Alternatives”, written by Alida Merlo and Peter Benekos. The second article is written David Risley and is entitled “Mandatory minimum sentences are an Effective Strategy in the War on Drugs”.

The first article states that the incarceration of many criminals is not necessary. The petty offenders are being thrown in jail for many years at a time. With most of the jails and prison populations going up, the government is forced to build new prisons or adding on to existing buildings. The governments, including federal, state, and local, are forced to look at some alternative ways around incarceration because many don’t have the money to build on to their prisons and jails. Some of the alternatives to spending the money on building



References: Merlo, Alida and Benekos, Peter. (1999) “Prison over crowding creates a Need for Prison Alternatives”. Article 15. Opposing viewpoints on Prisons. Risley, David. (2000) “Mandatory Sentences are an Effective Strategy in the War on Drugs”. Article 2. Opposing viewpoints on Mandatory Drug Sentencing.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    As an American who is privileged enough to live in a wealthy community, attend a good school, and not have to worry about where my next meal will come from, many of my country’s most pressing issues aren’t problems I’m faced with on a daily basis. However, many Americans are uninformed and subsequently overlook one such issue, unaware of the harmful effect it has on their lives. The “it” in question is mandatory minimum sentencing policy. While most people assume these laws have no affect on anyone excluding the person being sentenced, in reality, the effects of mandatory minimums are far reaching. Aside from the prisoner and his/her family, the tax dollars or hard-working citizens are used to pay for the extended prison stays of thousands of fellow Americans. A whopping 67% of them are nonviolent drug offenders, according to a U.S. Sentencing Commission Report to Congress. It is imperative that the American government abolishes mandatory minimums because they have an…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montaldo, C. (2007). Mandatory drug sentencing laws. About: Crime/Punishment. Retrieved on January 10, 2007 from www.crime.about.com/od/issues/i/drug_sentence_2.htm…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Sentencing term for drug offenders range from 5 years to 20 years, contingent upon the sort and amount of the drug” Christopher Reinhart (2008). This would lessen the spending on prisoners that committed a minor violation. Another strategy will be set in place to send these wrongdoers to jail adversely affecting recidivism. As agreed by McVay at el, (2004), “(1) treatment appears to be cost effective, particularly when compared to incarceration, which is often the alternative. (2) Treatment costs ranged from a low of $1,800 per client to a high of approximately $6,800 per client”. Equity: The termination of mandatory sentencing will be beneficial to both detainees and New York City government. Political Acceptability: This alternative received a score of 1 for political acceptability. Mandatory sentencing may be within the suggested range, however could likewise be shorter or more, in view of the judge's discretion. As agreed by Mandatory Minimum Sentences stating that “a mandatory minimum sentence requires a judge to impose a statutorily fixed sentence on individual offenders convicted of certain crimes, regardless other mitigating factors”. Financial Feasibility: This is the most convincing alternative because of the high financial feasibility. This alternative program will be financial feasibility…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Since the 1970s the rate of incarceration in the United States has quadrupled, after having been relatively flat over the prior half-century.”-Anthony Zurcher. The rate of prison incarcerations has increased so much over the years; the government can’t afford to incarcerate that many people. Karen Thomas’s article “Time to Invest in Schools, Note Prisons” shows that United States incarcerates too many criminals violent and non-violent. Joan Petersilia said in her article “Beyond the Prison Bubble” that, the United States has the highest incarceration rate of any free nation. This also supports the idea that The United States incarcerates too many people.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rationale that the author presents for reducing the sentences of drug offenders is the racist delineation correlating to the 100:1 cracked cocaine violations. The author delineates the 100:1 punishments are divisive and racially fractured. Two additional data points delineated by Harvey Gee are housing costs correlated to offenders and faulty science.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States prison system is not a suitable place for nonviolent drug offenders. The high rate of recidivism is caused by one thing and one thing only, prison sentences. Nonviolent drug offenders will have no choice other than to socialize with other inmates, some who have committed irreprehensible crimes, thereby greatly increasing their chance of becoming violent. The population of prisons in the United States is on a steady rise. One way to stop this is by reevaluating the three strikes law, because the proof that this law discourages repeat offenders is simply not there.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the text “Reconsidering Mandatory Minimum Sentences: The Arguments for and Against Potential Reforms” By Evan Bernick and Paul Larkin,it stated, “Mandatory minimum sentences also prevent crime because certain and severe punishment inevitably will have a deterrent effect.” In other words, sentencing a person with a precise amount time in prison would leave a long-term effect on the person that they would mostly like not commit another crime. Their statement is invalid because in the article “ Against his better Judgement” by Eli Saslow, it states, “But most mandatory sentences applied to drug charges and according to police data, drug use had remained steady since the 1980’s even as the number of drug offenders in federal prison increased by 2,200 percent.” That being said, drug use rates neither increased nor changed but Mandatory Minimum sentencing, once again, fed into the increase of prison rates.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As violent crime continued to rise, the public demanded harsher and more definite sentences. The rehabilitative concept was called into question as to its effectiveness, leading to the birth of the determinate sentencing structure. The determinate sentencing structure is that which gives an offender a fixed term of incarceration. This type of structured sentencing reform can be used to deter potential offenders and incapacitate dangerous offenders. For example, bringing drug paraphernalia into a prison requires a fixed prison sentence of two years. Judges, in such a case, do not have discretion when the statute “determines” what the sentence is to…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.(2014), “mandatory sentencing was passed in the 1980s, by U.S. Congress and many state representing two bodies with yearnings that it will the settled jail terms to those arraigned particular infringement, much of the time drug offense”. Rather, this cruel sentencing adversely, packing the penitentiaries with low-level transgressors at a higher cost to taxpayers. As indicated by Paul Larkin and Evan Bernick (2014), “mandatory minimum sentences have not eliminated sentencing disparities because they have not eliminated sentencing discretion; they have merely shifted…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In, “Beyond the Prison Bubble,” published in the Wilson Quarterly in the winter 2011, Joan Petersilia shows different choices about the imprisonment systems. The United States has the highest incarceration rate of any free nation (para.1). The crime rate over a thirty year span had grown by five times since 1960 to 1990. There are more people of color or Hispanics in federal and state institutions then there are of any other nationality. The prison system is growing more than ever; the growth in twenty years has been about 21 new prisons. Mass imprisonment has reduced crime but, has not helped the inmate to gradually return back to society with skills or education. But the offenders leaving prison now are more likely to have fairly long criminal records, lengthy histories of alcohol and drug abuse, significant periods of unemployment and homelessness, and physical or mental disability (par.12).…

    • 259 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minimum mandatory sentences have been established since the inception of our criminal justice system. However, these laws have gained much-needed attention as of late due to the ripple effect it has caused relating to the war on drugs. The war on drugs have been going on since the 1980s, but the use of these laws have created bigger problems in poor communities. These laws have hindered the progression of families and communities. Minimum mandatory sentences are not an effective tool in combatting the issue of controlled substances abuse and trafficking and should be repealed.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More than half of prisoners are currently serving time for non-violent drug related offenses, as the popularity for “war on drugs” has increased over the last decade. The majority of inmates are harshly sentenced, including doubling of imprisonment time for repeat offenders. For example, the federal law issues that selling 28 grams of crack cocaine requires a sentence of at least five years. Because even more convicts are being sent to prison, overcrowding has forced institutions to release prisoners early to meet budget requriements. Most of these inmates become homeless and are diagnosed with many medical problems, often getting little to no help. Being that this subject is an issue currently in society, I also had to cope with consequences…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of mandatory minimums within our judicial system is not winning the war on drugs. This country needs drug law reforms to turn the tide on the war on drugs, and minimize their impact on our society. This comes from rehabilitation programs that are more effective and less costly for our government.…

    • 3198 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The country should take a new look at drug legalization as a solution to a problem that has been long out of control. Although a person may feel that he or she can't live without their particular addiction, there is no scientific proof or medical test for an addict. Since drug legalization is the topic of this essay let us focus on alternatives to the War on Drugs. One possibility for controlling drug abuse is to legalize illegal drugs. In contrast to today's society where drugs are illegal there is not much difference. If the government would legalize and regulate drugs a substantial industry and tax income would result. The jail overcrowding problem would be reduced by fifty percent in some estimates and violent crime would decline. Of course…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics