Preview

Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1078 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism
A) Explain the main strengths of Mills Utilitarianism?
With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.
Some people see Mill as a rule utilitarian, which means that you act in accordance with those rules which, if generally followed, would provide the greatest general balance of pleasure over pain. This rule is also in line with how society works in the way that most people would prefer to cause pleasure rather than pain.
Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad.
There are two types of rule utilitarian. There is the strong rule utilitarian and there is the weak rule utilitarian and they can be identified by the strong utilitarian’s principles should never be broken and the weak rule utilitarian’s principles has a bit of give in the way you can apply it to a particular situation over the general rule.
The strong form of the theory maintains that rules established through the application of utilitarian principle should never be broken. This means that there is no give in the rules and if you break the rules than you are going against the rule utilitarian act.
The weak version allows for the possibility that those same utilitarian principles can take precedence in a particular situation over a general rule. However, the rule would still form part of the decision making process.
The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2).…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    person’s life and directly impedes their autonomy. So, it is never justified to use utilitarian…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act utilitarianism states that, when faced with a choice, we must first consider the likely consequences of potential actions and, from that, choose to do what we believe will generate most pleasure. On the other hand rule utilitarian, one begins by looking at potential rules of action. To determine whether a rule should be followed, one looks at what would happen if it were constantly followed. If adherence to the rule produces more happiness than otherwise, it is a rule that morally must be followed at all times. With these two types of…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With restricted utilitarianism, there is one major condition that rule utilitarians put more than anything else and that is, under no circumstances, break the rules. Technically, there is two circumstances that would make a rule utilitarian tests an individual action is when one of two things happen, first, the action falls under two different rules and they collide with each other. The other circumstance is when there is no rule that can make the decision for them.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    act and rule

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will be comparing the Act and Rule variations of Utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Jeremy Bentham formalized this theory through his principle of Utility, “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Act Utilitarianism is often linked to Jeremy Bentham’s principle of Utility as it follows the one rule – “the greatest good for the greatest number”. So an individual action is only right if it promotes happiness. Rule utilitarianism argues that moral rules, also based on the principle of Utility, should be kept by everyone in similar circumstances.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill’s argues that pleasures can differ in quality by saying that the estimation of pleasures should be supposed to depend on quantity alone. He is trying to say that quantity works better than quality for example if there is one to two person have enough knowledge anything they can only explain their idea and what they think, but if there is a lot of people having some knowledge can make good decision than two of those because they have their large group and can share their own idea to all, in final they make decision including all idea. He also explain that why some pleasure are better than other. He says about happiness and what utilitarianism is? “The supplementary explanations do not affect the theory of life…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The second form of utilitarianism is called rule utilitarianism. According to our text, this form of utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied, not to individual actions, but to moral codes as a whole (Shaw & Barry, p.76).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism brings an extended concept of Bentham's philosophy and a response to Kant's deontological philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in such a way as to create the most pleasure or the least pain. This is the guideline because, as Mill states, we desire happiness; happiness is maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However, is utilitarianism viable? There are many arguments for it, but just as many against.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a further division between utilitarians; Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism, holds that one should always follow rules that tend to promote the general welfare of humans for example a rule might be not to killing people. Act Utilitarianism holds that one should always act to promote the general welfare.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism derives itself from a combination of hedonism and consequentialism. Hedonism suggests that consequences are good as long as they lead to pleasure, which is the ultimate good in the case of utilitarianism. On the other hand, consequentialism argues that the right action is the one that produces the best consequences, and maximizes utility. Mill argues that the only factor relevant to actions is the amount of pleasure or pain produced, not the motives that propel action. Utilitarianism seems to be based off of a calculation aiming to minimize pain and maximize pleasure. While justice can initially be seen as an objection to this school of ethics, it can be argued that justice complements, and does not challenge the principles…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innovative Utilitarianism

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Meaning that those actions which present the greater pleasure as their results rather than pain are more ethically acceptable and for a fact that, rightness and wrongness of an act solely imply to the satisfaction of individual desire generated in the consequences of doing the act that is the most pleasurable. In sum, according to Mill, the quality of pleasure, owe to the consequences of the act needs to be evaluated by the rightness and wrongness of the given actions and rules, for the reason that moral duties are more of an instrumental act and not…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics