Preview

Khrushchev Successes And Failures

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Khrushchev Successes And Failures
Analyze the successes and failures of Soviet policies towards Germany and the eastern European satellite states during the regimes of Khrushchev and Brezhnev

In order to analyze the successes and failures of Soviet policies towards Germany and the eastern European satellite states during the regimes of Khrushchev and Brezhnev one must choose eastern European satellites that were affected by the Soviet policies most and had a direct relationship with Moscow during the reigns of these two leaders: Khrushchev (1953 – 1964) and Brezhnev (1964 – 1982). In this case, I decided to choose Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia as eastern communist states as there were some important government changes with which the Soviets had to deal. One should also acknowledge that
…show more content…
However, Soviet leaders worried that the liberalization of the government had gone too far. Thus, Rakosi was placed back into the post of Prime Minister. The indecisiveness of the Soviets in their policies led to an unrest situation in Hungary. Now, on the one hand, there was Rakosi who attempted to maintain his hard-line, Stalinist policies. On the other hand, there was Nagy who used the de-Stalinization campaign to push for reform. People started to revolt and the Soviet ambassador requested an intervention of troops from Khrushchev. The request was ignored as first as Khrushchev wanted to have peace negotiations. However, on November 1 when Nagy announced that Hungary was withdrawing from the Warsaw Pact and declared Hungary's neutrality and appealed to the United Nations for recognition of this neutrality there was no doubt that Soviet troops would be deployed. On November 1, 1956, Soviet troops entered Hungary with the mission of crushing the revolution. Thus, the policy of “the thaw” turned out to be failure as the Soviets themselves did not pursue the reform by sending their troops to Hungary. This means that Khrushchev as a leader

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eco 316 Week 1 Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This work of ECO 316 Week 1 Chapter 1 Introducing Money and the Financial System consists of:…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 301 Week 4 Summary

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    · 2 to 3 slides:Summary of how international affairs of the 1980s contributed to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the end of the Cold War…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Paul Seary Case

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages

    ‘From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia, all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet Sphere, and all are subject in one form or another, not only to Soviet influence…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relations between the USA and Soviet Union underwent dramatic change in the years 1943-47. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that they had gone from allies during the Second World War to a rivalry which went onto dominate the latter part of the twentieth century and world politics, in a period known as the Cold War. This essay therefore hopes to analyse the key reasons that led to this breakdown in relations by looking chronologically at the long-term distrust suffered by nations, the growing and conflicting differences between Capitalism and Communism, the Soviet Expansion into Eastern Europe, the atomic bomb and finally the Marshall Plan in 1947.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the Soviet Union’s perspective, they first had, and made the choice to not militarily interfere with the Hungarian uprising. Of course, this soon changed, and the Soviets based on minutes document, had found themselves in a position in which they had no other choice but to send tanks into Hungary, to surpass the uprising. There were multiple reasons why the Soviet Union felt the need to interfere in the uprising, but did they have the choice? One of the essential reasons why Nikita Khrushchev later sent in tanks into Hungary, despite having pulled out in the early start of the revolution, was mainly due to Nagy’s wish to withdraw from the Warsaw pact, after a year it was created. This made Khrushchev furious; due to the fact they were breaking the Warsaw Pact contract, and were violating the rules. Based on the minute’s document, this was Khrushchev primary reason to sending in the military into Hungary in order to capture Nagy. Did Khrushchev have a choice at this point? Khrushchev didn’t want other Eastern European countries to be influenced by Hungary, in their attempt to start a revolution, and leave the Warsaw Pact. In order for Khrushchev to show Eastern European nations he was still in power, he had no other choice but to fight the Hungarian rebels in order to discourage another revolution. The USSR was using Eastern European countries as factories, so that they would maintain a strong economy, and that was another reason behind Khrushchev not wanting Hungary to influence other nations into revolting. Due to the Hungarian revolution against the Soviet Union, the soviet police, and communist parties were hung in public, and murdered ruthlessly. This was also against the law, and Khrushchev found it absurd they would do such acts. Therefore in a Soviets prospective view on the situation, they believe they had no other choice but to interfere, due to Nagy’s…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq on ww2

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to prove itself as being more powerful than the United States, the Soviet Union spread its form of government to other countries around the world—whether by using force or by aiding the creation of communist governments. The maps in Doc 1 and Doc 7 illustrate the Soviets’ desire to spread communism, not just to their satellite nations around them, but even farther to Vietnam. It would have been helpful to add a map of the communist and non-communist countries in Europe before WWII to compare to Doc 1 in order to highlight the amount of control the USSR gained trying to beat the US in the Cold War. Documents 3 and 9 suggest that, aside from a few rebels, Hungary and Nicaragua welcomed the Soviets’ help in switching to communism and training communist soldiers. However, docs 2 and 9 offer contradictory viewpoints which suggest that Russian invaded their countries and unwillingly coerced a communist government on them, when the Hungarian radio station says, “Early this morning Soviet troops launched a general attack on Hungary,” (Doc 2) and when Violeta Chamorro in doc 10 calls for Nicaraguans to fight for freedom by, “burying Communism and proclaiming democracy.” Doc 3 was a broadcast on a Moscow radio station, so it portrays the USSR as being in control so that the citizens of the Soviet Union will support their government. Although it biased against the USSR, doc 2 probably more accurately describes how Hungary was affected by the Soviets’ goal of the Cold War to be more powerful than the US. Doc 9 is relatively neutral, but since doc…

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Part 1: Basic Features of Post War Soviet Outlook, as Put Forward by Official Propaganda Machine…

    • 4628 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘Khrushchev fell from power because he failed to convince the party of the need to carry out fundamental reform in the USSR’…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    History Study Guide

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ­ the conflicting U.S. and soviet aims in Eastern Europe ­ the state of hostility…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The single document that best illustrated American anti-communism and general suspicion of Soviet aspirations was George Kennan's famous Long Telegram of 1946. The Long Telegram was perhaps the most cited and most influential statement of the early years of the Cold War.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nikita Khrushchev attacked Joseph Stalin at the Twentieth Congress of the CPSU in his secret speech. His goals behind the presentation of the speech were self-serving in nature. Khrushchev wanted to consolidate power while at the same time distance himself from Stalin. His lack of political forethought created a specific set of problems for the Communist Party and the Soviet Union. Khrushchev’s program of de-Stalinization had a negative impact on Soviet political relations both at the domestic and international levels.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I read documents of The Sinews of Peace (‘Iron Curtain Speech’), Central Intelligence agency report, “Consequences of a Breakdown in Four-Power Negotiations on Germany”, Letter from Khrushchev to Ulbricht regarding the situation in Berlin, and Speech by President Ronald Reagan at the Brandenburg Gate, West Berlin, ‘Remarks on East-West Relations.’ The documents took place around 1946 through 1961. As each document explains and ties together the tension that was occurring in Europe and the Wester Powers. As the division was separating major cities and countries, of control and communism that was destructing the peace and recovery of the Wars.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Whatever

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare and contrast the political and economic policies of Joseph Stalin in the period before the Second world War and those of Mikhail Gorbachev (1985-1991).…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to evaluate the success, or to some extent the failure, of their economic policies, it is necessary to consider their personal ambitions, if any, and the internal and external circumstances facing the USSR that influenced economic policy making. (Miss Daley's essay)…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nikita Khrushchev, though not the most likely successor to Stalin, became the leader of the USSR in 1953 and was toppled from power in 1964 after a Coup in which his policies were attacked by his colleagues. They accused him of being contradictory towards Lenin’s teachings, especially in his agricultural and industrial policies, in being an unfitted leader and erratic in his approach, as well as being reckless over the Cuban Missiles Crisis and West Berlin and ignoring advice. The cause of Khrushchev’s downfall is a contentious issue among historians. Some historians such as Martin Page argue that it was as unhappiness among party hardliners with his reforms that led to him losing power. Upon…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays