Preview

Kant's Critic of the Onthological Argument

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1055 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Critic of the Onthological Argument
Kant’s criticism of the Ontological Argument Bryan COUNTER

Philosophy of religion Dr. Harvey White December 12th, 2012. Bryan Counter Dr. Harvey White Pholosophy of religion December 12th. 2012

In my life I have come to question many things that people take on as blind faith. We all know that someday we will 'physically ' die, Yet, we deny the forces working inside ourselves which want to search out the true outcome of what may or may not come after death. It 's far easier for humanity to accept that they will go on to a safe haven and be forgiven for all, rather than to question the existence of a super omnipotent being. Fortunately, there are some of us who tend to question the why 's and how 's that come before us. Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher who had the courage to question the proof of the existence of that being, which we call God. This essay will give a careful explanation of Kant’s criticism of the Ontological Argument looking at Kant’s analytic and synthetic distinction regarding judgment, but first we need to really understand the main idea of the Ontological Argument in order to understand Kant’s criticism. First of all, God generally refers to one supreme, holy, personal being, and considering this St. Anselm developed what is called the Ontological Argument, which is suppose to prove the existence of God. He began his argument by saying that even a fool can grasp or understand the concept of "a being than of which nothing greater can



Bibliography: http://ocw.nd.edu/philosophy/introduction-to-philosophy-1/readings/anselm-proslogion-selections Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1929. Borchert M., Donald, Encyclopedia of Philosophy vol.7. Macmillan reference USA. Detroit. 2006. -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. http://ocw.nd.edu/philosophy/introduction-to-philosophy-1/readings/anselm-proslogion-selections [ 2 ]. Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason. (St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1929) p.500-504. [ 3 ]. Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason. (St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1929) p.504-507. [ 4 ]. Borchert M., Donald, Encyclopedia of Philosophy vol.7. (Macmillan reference USA. Detroit. 2006) p.18-19

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Modern philosophy began with an enthusiastic faith in the powers of human reason to reach the truth. It represented a protest against the methods of Scholasticism and demanded a free field for unrestricted inquiry to work out its own salvation.[2]”…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ontological argument rests on the premise that the universe’s existence is contingent- it depends on something else to exist. The argument is deductive, analytic and a priori, and was first formed by St. Anselm, who prayed for a short argument that would prove God to be “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. This prayer was called the proslogion and tried to prove God by means of reductio ad absurdum, which states that the existence of God is logically necessary. The argument is based on the word “God”, a being that possesses all perfections, therefore must exist. Anselm was aware that the existence of God is denied by atheists and in response to this, he states “the fool has said in his heart there is no God”.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Saint Anselm and Gaunilo’s “The Ontological Argument”, Anselm believes that God is the greatest of all conceivable things and nothing else can be ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Out of the two arguments presented by Anselm and Aquinas the one that makes the most sense to me is Aquinas. I think this because, unlike Anselm, Aquinas believes that people will never be able to fully grasp an understanding of “God’s nature” through reason alone. In my opinion Anselm is a mix between Locke's Empiricism and Kant's Structuralism. On the other hand Aquinas is more along the lines of someone who practices Plato's Dualism, and Descartes' Rationalism.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sibley, W.M. (1953) “The Rational Versus the Reasonable”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1953), pp.554-560, Philosophical Review, Duke University Press.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Proslogion” Anselm argues God as the greatest conceivable being that exists in reality. In this essay, I will show that Anselm’s ontological argument is sound and his conclusion logically follows from his premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm, Gauinilo.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    St. Anselm wrote “The Ontological Proof of God’s Existence”. He believes it is one thing for an object to be in the understanding and another to understand that the object exists. God must exist in the mind even if that mind is a “fool” who doesn’t believe in God. He thinks that if the greatest possible being (God) exists in the mind, then he must exist in reality. If God only exists in the mind, then an even greater being must be possible. This being exists in the mind…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In philosophy, an ontological argument is a kind of argument that establishes the existence of some entity. In the case of Anselm, he argues in favor of God’s existence. In this paper, I will discuss relevant information necessary to understand Anselm’s reasoning. Then I will break down Anselm’s argument. Finally, I will present Galindo's Perfect Island Objection and explain why his criticisms are unfounded.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anselm defines God as a being “that than which no greater can be conceived.” He argues that, whatever can be understood exists in the mind and that the concept of God can be understood, so God exists in the mind. Anselm then tries to prove that God also exists in reality and not only in the mind. The first premises states “assume that God only exists in the mind and not in reality.” The second premises positions “but then a greater being than God can be thought.” Finally, we can conclude “but God was defined as a being that than which nothing greater can be conceived; so, no greater than God can be thought.” The second and last premises that “a greater being than God can be thought” and “no greater than God can be thought” are contradictions. Therefore, our original assumption that God only exists in reality must be false. Anselm implies that only a fool would deny God’s existence. He questions, “Why, then, has the fool said in his heart, there is no God (Psalms XIV. 1), since it is so evident, to a rational mind, that you do exist in the highest degree of all? Why, except that he is…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 13, 2013, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the noumenon is supposedly beyond human understanding, it doesn’t seem consistent to decide to undermine the unknowable nature by negation. The motivation of the inclusion the noumenal world is revealed in Kant’s antimonies, which are sets of arguments that are perfectly balanced arguments equivalent in logical strength with no…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consider what Immanuel Kant would say, and explain that with reference to this week’s readings.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can truly say that I have found Saint Anselm Ontological Argument to be very interesting and I was so fascinated by his life and the stand he took to prove his reasoning in his argument.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays