Preview

John Brown: Hero Or Traitor?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Brown: Hero Or Traitor?
John Brown was an abolitionist during the lead up to the Civil War. He believed that God chose him to end slavery and kill southerners with only violence in his toolbelt. Brown had controversy over his actions. The nation was already tenuous and the murders that John Brown committed only added to that. The north was all for it, Brown was doing what they hadn’t had the courage to do. The southerners were outraged, claiming Brown for a traitor. I believe John Brown was a terrorist. He was on an expedition for vengeance by inflicting death on innocent citizens. John Brown and his sons committed unrightful and most importantly, unlawful actions. John Brown was sentenced for treason, murder, and revolting against his home country. As he sat in …show more content…
He came to people's houses, as stated from a widow who lost her family to Brown, “several came into the house, and said that they were from the army”. Lying for a cause from “God himself” is not justified. Brown and his sons claimed these men as his prisoners, then proceeded to hack pro-slavery families to death with a broadsword, just leaving them “lying dead in the road near together”. Slavery is terrible, but it cannot be corrected by murder. Some people believe that John Brown was a martyr. People in the North especially believed he was a martyr because he was doing what they lacked the courage to do. When comparing John Brown to a martyr or terrorist, he fits the definition of a terrorist by using violence against innocent people for political and religious differences. The southerners had different beliefs, so in Brown’s eye, they deserved to be murdered. He used extreme tactics and never used his passion and influences for good. John Brown was a controversial and yet courageous leader prior to the Civil War. Brown showed no regret throughout his actions and even through his arrest. He used intimidation and persuaded people by death and by sword rather than by a pen. John Brown lost his opportunity to be a martyr when he started terrorizing the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1982 DBQ

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page

    actions on the other hand were not as right as would be other means. John Brown though he…

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hero or criminal? John Brown was a radical abolitionist who was born on May 9, 1800, in Torrington, Connecticut. He was one of the so-called worst and the greatest abolitionists of his time. Brown believed that violence was the one and only way to bring an end to slavery. He provoked the slaves to revolt against their owners by giving them guns and support. Also in 1859, Brown and his 21 men army seized the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in the hope of gaining guns and supplies for the slaves. The attack was not a success because he was captured and both of his sons got killed during the fight. After a speedy trial, he was convicted to death, which in this case was not even such a huge surprise according to all the blood that he shed in the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Between the years 1859 and 1863 John Brown’s rain on the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry made him a hero in the North and a villain in the South. Brown’s raid was over in about 2 days. He wanted to start an armed slave revolt by seizing the Federal Armory. John Brown was hung for treason because of his actions. Brown’s plan was not to conduct a sudden raid and then escape to the mountains. Rather, his plan was to use those rifles and pikes he captured at the arsenal, in addition to those he brought along, to arm rebellious slaves with the aim of striking terror to the slaveholders in Virginia.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the History Court’s trial of John Brown, the jury found him to be guilty. John Brown was deemed guilty of being morally unjustified for an insurrection. This insurrection was the killing of several slave owners and their families, and the starting of a slave uprising. The Prosecution made several key points. Their first witness, William Wilberforce, was able to nonviolently stop the slave trade in Britain. Through his use of nonviolence, many people followed him. William stated that it was worth it, although it may have taken longer than if he had used violence. He said that if the process had been faster, people would’ve had to die. The Prosecution’s second witness, Levi Coffin, was an abolitionist and the president of the Underground…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John brown has been looked upon by many as a hero, but was he really a hero? Let’s look at the thing’s he’s done for abolition and think to ourselves as we read, “is this really what a ‘hero’ would do?” I’ll go into more detail later through out this of course, but for now, let’s review the gist of what he has “done for abolition.” From the third document, it states that he led only 21 men into the military arsenal in Harpers Ferry, Virginia. That was basically suicide for them. Yes, it was very brave of him, but he should have realized 21 men wouldn’t be enough for how many men that military had. He planned to give the weapons from the arsenal to slaves and start a chain reaction of revolts throughout the Southeast. All I have to ask is really? Did he really think that it would be that easy to take from the arsenal? Not only that, but in document two it also states that in 1856, Brown and six of his followers got revenge for the violence in Lawrence by killing five settlers in the pro-slavery camps along the Pottawatomie Creek. He also fled to Kansas, like a coward, to escape prosecution. This should be enough information for you, but let’s go into further detail.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John brown was about…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was an American born abolitionist who actively fought Slavery through the use of violence. His ultimate goal was to overthrow the entire system of Slavery in the south, and he went about doing so through armed attacks, including his infamous raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859. John Brown’s armed attack on Harper’s Ferry caused a major dispute between the nation’s separate slavery movements, and had substantial effects in the social and political ideologies of the American people. His antics ultimately played a key role in the swaying of opinions towards slavery leading into the upcoming presidential election of 1860, and as a result, should be considered America’s first true hero. Despite his poorly thought out, and short lasting raid…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood (John Brown)”. John Brown used violence and killed many people. Not only that, but the death of two of his sons was not enough to stop him from moving on. Brown was so determined that he believed it was God’s wish that he abolishes slavery. He thought he was made for this job only. John Brown reckoned violence is the solution to achieve his goal and be successful. He led a raid on Harper’s Ferry with several men. The motive behind this was to start up a slave insurrection. But the first man killed during the raid was a black.Though Brown’s intentions were noble, the way he acted upon them were not. Therefore, John Brown is guilty of trespassing, treason, and murder.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abraham Lincoln called John Brown a misguided fanatic! John Brown was not a misguided fanatic. John Brown tried his best to save the slaves from all the hard work and bring them to freedom, he just wanted slavery to end. Brown took a vow to end slavery when he found out that an abolitionist newspaperman was killed. He didn’t want anyone to harm the slaves, so he had a plan to save the slaves, he had a meeting with Frederick Douglass about the plan to save the slaves, so things wouldn't get out of hand, but Douglass opposed to his plan, Brown’s plan was to take over Harper’s Ferry, because Douglass knew that his plan would have failed and have also led to many black deaths, he thought that Brown would’ve hurt the abolition movement by causing…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Brown: Hero? Villain?

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Students of history and those merely interested in casual inquiry will often explore a topic, find a legitimate opinion, accept it at face value, and move on. Too often with young or inexperienced historians this is the case. It does, in a way, make sense. Many topics an individual will study have been researched and written on countless times. It is easy to accept an opinion as is and forget about it. John Brown is one of these subjects. Merrill D. Peterson’s John Brown explores the complicated nature of the legacy of this militant abolitionist. Brown has been, in the time since his departure, construed as a hero, a villain, an antihero, a well-meaning lunatic, and so on. The nature of his actions and the divisive context they are found in gives way to many different opinions. Peterson’s book explores these many definitions of John Brown. The opinions of historians, students, politicians, and the like are weighed against the validity of their status as historical interpreters, their knowledge of the subject, their biases, and Peterson’s own interpretations. John Brown’s legacy is an ambiguous and complicated one and Peterson’s book explores the warring opinions of observers on whether John Brown is hero, villain, or both.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think Benedict Arnold deserves this dishonor as America's greatest traitor. It is true that Arnold helped very much at the Battle of Quebec and Saratoga, getting his leg wounded. Arnold wanted the fame and the money for his country though. Benedict Arnold’s father was an early Patriot, so Arnold probably followed the lead of his father. He wanted to restore his family name to whatever the cost, but instead he ruined it. The James Reed Council had been closely investigating his actions. Benedict Arnold was constantly going to Loyalists’ houses, dancing with the women, and having parties with them. Benedict Arnold used George Washington selfishly, for his own purpose to be in charge of West Point, one of the most important forts for America. In the reply of Washington saying that he wanted to postpone the trial, Arnold said, “Delay in the present case is worse than death.” It was just some time later that he met with Joseph Stansbury, a close Loyalist, to discuss his ideas about joining the British army. There he sent coded messages to John Andre to discuss with Henry Clinton. He plotted a plan to get rid of the American army. Benedict wanted to be on the winning side of the war, so he could get most of the credit. Arnold was even trying to plot more plans when Ande died. He also used Joshua…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson was, and still is a beloved president to many people. The common person might look at our seventh president as a true war hero, when in fact Andrew Jackson was like a tyrant in many ways. He was the reason for about 7,000 Cherokees deaths, and violated many laws. The only reason Andrew Jackson was not impeached was because the senate did not provide a two thirds vote.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My third and final reason that I belive John Brown is a terrorist is that John Brown was Abolitionist not a proponet of anti-slavery. Anti-slavery meant no slaves for the north bu keep the slaves for the southerners. Where abolitionist disagreed and wanted to have all slavery abolished. With that I belive that the abolitionist having this radical point of view would give them the chance to do more drastic things. To get there pint across to the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the ironies of the Civil War era and the end of slavery in the United States has always been that the man who played the role of the Great Emancipator was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of two million black slaves, has never entirely shaken off the imputation that he was something of a half-heart about it. "There is a counter-legend of Lincoln," acknowledges historian Stephen B. Oates, "one shared ironically enough by many white southerners and certain black Americans of our time" who are convinced that Lincoln never intended to abolish slavery--that he "was a bigot...a white racist who championed segregation, opposed civil and political rights for black people" and "wanted them all thrown out of the country." That reputation is still linked to the 19th-century denunciations of Lincoln issued by the abolitionist vanguard.…

    • 5760 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was an abolitionist, who grew up despising slavery. His father was a supporter of the new abolitionism laws. This idealist was instilled in John Brown and he kept this mindset for the rest of his life. To say John Brown was a terrorist is very questionable. The definition of a terrorist is: somebody who uses violence, especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to intimidate others, often for political purposes. Yes, this could be true for John Brown. He did kill, kidnap, and intimidated those who were pro-slavery, but so was John Wilkes Booth and a group of co-conspirators.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays