The three Gospels written by Matthew, Mark, and Luke are collectively known as the Synoptic Gospels. The fourth Gospel, which was written by John, bears some stark distinction between itself and the Synoptic Gospels. It is important to understand that the Gospels, which were written around 70 A.D., are not biographies or eyewitness accounts of Jesus. Instead, they are sermons about the meaning of Jesus' life. Moreover, the Gospels are two generations removed from the actual life of Jesus. The first generation would be considered the life of Jesus himself from approximately 4 B.C. through 30 A.D.. Had Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John actually been close to Jesus during his life, perhaps the Gospels would likely be different from what they are today. The second generation is made up of earlier accounts written by numerous sources between the death of Jesus at roughly 70 A.D.. As a result of this forty-year gap between the actual life of Jesus and what we know of today as the Gospels, it can be assumed that what is written in the Gospels are in no way a detailed account of Jesus' …show more content…
However, while writing the Gospels, certain speeches and other appearances might have been moved around to promote a certain agenda that each of the authors wanted to promote. For example, it is clear that Matthew makes several comparisons between Jesus and Moses in hopes of bolstering Jesus' status as a leader of the people of Israel. On page 1152 of The New Jerusalem Bible, Matthew tells the story of the Sermon on the Mountain. "Seeing the crowds, he went onto the mountain. And when he was seated his disciples came to him. Then he began to speak." (Bible, 1152. 5:1). In this Gospel, Jesus goes up a mountain, much the way Moses did when he received the Ten Commandments. However, in Luke's Gospel, Jesus delivers the same sermon in a different fashion. "He then came down with them and stopped at a piece of level ground where there was a large gathering of his disciples." (1214, 6:17). In a direct contradiction to Matthew's Gospel, Luke tells a story of Jesus coming down onto level ground, as opposed to going up a mountain. This can be seen as a comparison to King Samuel, an important figure in the Old Testament that led Israel for a number of years, as a king would come down to speak with his people on their level. It is important to recognize that neither version of these Gospels provides the reader with when or where the Sermon on the Mount was delivered. This