Preview

IsaacS Period 4 LEQ

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
IsaacS Period 4 LEQ
Isaac Sadler
AP U.S. History
Period 4 LEQ
January 17, 2015

Period 4 LEQ

LEQ Question: Political parties contributed to the development of national unity in the United States between 1790 and 1840. Support, modify, or refute this assertion, providing specific evidence to justify your answer.

A few decades after America won its freedom, unity was much desired amongst populous. Disunity usually occurs with two people or parties with different points of view, value systems, or class opinion clash; that is exactly what took place in the early 19th century America. Political parties hindered the development of national unity in the United States between 1790 and 1840 because of party polarity and sectionalism. Firstly, upon ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats parties established their footing in the American political system. These two parties divided the nation into northern ideals and southern Jefferson based ideals that were very different. Due to this political disunity, sectional interest arose rather than national interest as observed in the 1828 "tariff abomination.” Secondly, the two parties catered to different groups of people. The Democrats preferred the farmers and artisans while the Federalists favored aristocrats and merchants. The Democrats argued that Hamilton unceasingly tied the government to business, instead of promoting small agrarian farming. Mainly, the more upper-class New England merchants and aristocrats of the North followed Hamilton who established a strong economic policy with trading ties whereas the low and middle class farmers and artisans of the South followed Jefferson. This caused sectionalism amongst the classes and regions which certainly did not promote party unity. In conclusion, through political polarity and sectionalism amongst the classes and regions the political parties hindered the unity of America. This disunity festered and metastasized into economic and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of history many campaigns and elections have changed and been influenced by the time period surrounding them. The participation in political campaigns and elections in the United States between 1815-1840 greatly changed due to the significant effects of the War of 1812. As a new era formed as a result of the war, change in our nations politics did too. This new era known as “the era of good feelings” paved the way for change within our nations elections and campaigns. Just as it had united the voters of America in the beginning, its decline resulted in a growing show of sectionalism in the voters throughout the country.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divided We Govern was written by David R. Mayhew addresses the American government and the topic of united and divided party control. Throughout the essay, the author tried to talk about unified and divided control of the government from both views with five questions. The first view is that a united government allows the decisions of the country to be more effective in enacting laws, being held accountable, good government administration, better foreign policy decisions, and more benefits for the “non-rich” citizens of the United States (188). As Randall B. Ripley said, “To have a productive majority in the American system of government the President and a majority of both houses must be from the same party” (181). The second view is that a divided party control is just as effective as a unified party control of the government. Analysts John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson said, “When governments of quite different political combinations all fail to perform effectively, it is worth considering whether the problem is the government itself and not the people or parties that run it”…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time we see how the government that we see today evolved. From the 1790’s, American politics was a reflection of the hardships and degree of work needed to maintain an effective government. Throughout this time period the leaders of America faced many domestic and foreign affairs that were key to the formation of a new nation. With the election of Washington as the first president the chain of domestic affairs that helped shape American politics began with no other events in any time period could achieve. Thus ultimately determining that domestic events were more important in the shaping of the U.S. Also the foreign affairs with the guidelines set forth against the French sparked the way in which domestic affairs…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who were of the latter of the two, had ended up forming one of the two first political parties of the country; namely, the Federalist party. It consisted of people who, like Hamilton himself, supported a strong, central government, as well as some other stuff like positive relations with Britain. Of course, not everyone agreed with him, or his ideas; of these people was none other than Thomas Jefferson, who, as we know, has been his long-standing rival during most, if not all, of his political career. Soon enough, another political party popped up, whose main purpose was to, in the simplest words, rival the Federalist party; it was known as the Democratic-Republican Party. Essentially dividing the nation into two, this is what started our two-party system. Though this wasn’t exactly something he did directly, and was mostly a result of his work, it’s still a major part of society that rules over…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The political parties were divided as follows. There was Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and his followers who believed in a strong central government that would support their interests…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For over 60 years, there has been a profound separation in the United States government. The main source of division is between the Democratic and Republican parties. These parties are said to be polarized parties. In this case, polarization is when political parties stand for a different position depending on certain topics. The United States cant seem to come to an agreement with anything because these parties are on two totally different pages in almost every aspect of the government, spending, racial and social issues, war and law just to name a few. The differences between these two parties has caused the government to go into an uproar. The question that stands in front of us is how did American politics become so polarized, and can this polarization lead to changes in the American system?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of this, parties naturally form. In the United States, the formation can be traced to before The Constitution and the dispute over strong versus weak government, and continued to develop through the early years of the new government. Once the Constitution was established debates arose on several fronts. Whether it was through financial planning, distribution of power, or potentially unlawful treaties, tensions between the ideals of the two groups were enflamed. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were often so polarized that coming to compromises could be difficult, much to the chagrin of others, including Washington. However, they cannot be completely credited with forming the two-party system. Other politicians contributed, and at times the division was just the natural product of the circumstance. Also, they are not entirely the reason the system has persevered over time. Instead, the nature of elections in the United States have caused the two-party system to be maintained. All this being said, whether Hamilton and Jefferson are entirely to blame, they also proved that dissension is not always bad. It allows for different ideas to be heard and compromises to be made. Through their disagreements they produced innovation that has shaped the nation. This party system, though it has shifted and swapped over the years, still stands. The effects of these men run so deep that…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Party System Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The emergence of the second party system in the United States is a dynamic piece of our political history. This term was used as a way of stating the political party systems during the time period of the early/middle 1800’s. Due to separate views and rapidly rising voting interest, this is where the United States ultimately split into the Democratic and Whig Party. Although both parties were still growing at the time, both devised many major philosophies and had very important political figures as their leader.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time passes by we start to realize that everything is connected somehow. Even in history one thing leads to another, a domino effect. However, politics makes it impossible to have one answer to a simple question. Whether there is no answer, one answer, or two answers there is always opposition and consequences of those decisions. The impact of those decisions can either be seen right away or gradually build. Throughout the course of history, policies have been introduced, decisions have been taken, disagreements have been made, ideals have been questioned, concerns have risen, but the political system has lived through it all. A time period that became a critical period in shaping America’s political system was the Federalist Era while before that the Articles of Confederation displayed their significance.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sectionalism is a division within a country based on regional beliefs and interests. In the early to mid 1800’s, sectionalism in America grew as slavery divided in the Nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised, and argues about but the states until the conflict drove our country in the Civil War. Although regional differences are not distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country. These issues lead to what our history class describes as “modern sectionalism.” One such issue is to care more about soccer in Iowa Falls.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sedition Act of 1798

    • 2387 Words
    • 10 Pages

    For the first few years of Constitutional government, under the leadership of George Washington, there was a unity, commonly called Federalism that even James Madison (the future architect of the Republican Party) acknowledged in describing the Republican form of government-- " And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists." Although legislators had serious differences of opinions, political unity was considered absolutely essential for the stability of the nation. Political parties or factions were considered evil as "Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority…" Public perception of factions were related to British excesses and thought to be "the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished." James Madison wrote in Federalist Papers #10, "By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." He went on to explain that faction is part of human nature; "that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS." The significant point Madison was to make in this essay was that the Union was a safeguard against factions in that even if "the influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame…

    • 2387 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued that class conflict gave rise to the two party system. We begin by customarily separating American political history into three periods using changes in party names as the basis of division. According to this scheme, there have been three great party alignments since the formation of the Constitution: Federalist versus Republican/Democrats Whigs against the Democrats 1830-1856, and Republicans against Democrats 1856-present.But because of Hamilton’s financial plan it helped cement the two political party system that is a part of American politics today.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays