Preview

Is the New Right Internally Coherent?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is the New Right Internally Coherent?
The New Right is a radical branch of Conservatism which emerged in the 1970’s which had a large impact on both UK and USA politics. The New Right consists of two ideologies, neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism. The Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservatives have two very different outlooks upon the individual. The Neo-Libs (Neo-Liberals) view the individual as robust, resilient, self-seeking and essentially egotistical. Also that we are atomised rather than a group, we are a group of individuals. Whilst on the other hand the Neo-Cons (Neo-Conservatives) see us as intellectually, morally and psychologically limited, that we are imperfectable creatures. Though we have certain degrees of imperfection and those who are less imperfect should be the ones to rule and be in charge. Therefore in terms of their view of the individual they can be considered internally incoherent, since Neo-Libs have an optimistic view of the individual compared to Neo-Cons. Through their views on the individual comes their view on society. Neo-Libs view society as an implication of their view on the individual. As Thatcher said “There is no such thing as society, only individuals and their families.” People are atomistic, they only interact to promote self-interest. This differs from the Neo-Cons who see society as an Organic whole, that society is a collection of different parts and that these parts represent different organs when one fails or become damaged the others areas also suffer. Society has become like this through our imperfections as because we are imperfect we seek a sense of security and belonging shaping society. This shows that the New Right is again incoherent as the two ideologies clash and disagree with each other. With Society comes the need for a ruling body, the state, in which these two strands again have two different beliefs. The Neo-Libs believe in Negative Freedom, freedom from, so this why they wish a minimal state in terms on intervention into the economy and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.”…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The 1980s saw the rise of a new conservative movement known as the “New Right”…

    • 1112 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is often stated that the anti-welfare rhetoric of neoliberal states, is limited to social welfare by the government and not that freedom and welfare which can be derived from the market. However, such an assertion does not recognise the true nature of neoliberal rationalities.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For instance, the new left demanded freedom and peace now by taking immediate action while the new rights took the approach of “patience”, thinking past the present and how the present affects the future. The new left sought power in the form of actions and not so much its organizations. While the new right believed that power came from a position, political office, or a job. Unlike the liberal, the conservatives did not suffer from a generation age gap. The younger conservatives respected the older conservatives and their ideas. The younger conservatives seek the older conservatives for guidance and help. Conservatives were directed towards the white-collar employed. Anticommunist was a highly important stance for the conservative party in the 1960s. Conservatives are often described as the party that goes the old-fashion way. Conservatives also strongly believed in the idea that since everyone was different this meant that everyone should have different rewards and…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conservatism is defined to be “a set of political beliefs that include a limited role for the national government in helping individuals and in the economic affairs of the nation, as well as support for traditional values and lifestyles” (Sidlow & Henschen, 2016). During the 1950s and 1960s, conservatives emerged in opposition to Roosevelt’s New Deal. Conservatives are found on the right wing of the political spectrum, so they are in favor of limited government intervention, the free enterprise system, individual liberties, and retaining their traditional American values and beliefs. In today’s society, the population is divided between Democrats and Republicans based on their preferences. Both political parties utilize mass media to express and promote those opinions to the general audience.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Neo Conservatism

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neo- conservatist’s view a zombie invasion as a war against evil itself, they view zombies as a larger threat than clashes of human civilization which arguably is accurate, when it comes down to morals and ethics that the undead lack. Neo- conservatist’s focus on military force and include an aggressive armed invasion of the…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US History

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conservatism: from the Political Fringe to the Halls of Power 1. The age of Liberalism- 1930’s – 60’s 2. “Liberalism” defined: individual rights and freedoms protected by “activist” government. a. Liberalism’s roots: Progressivism and the New Deal 3. ! 950’s- Liberalism dominant… even among many Republicans…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start this off, conservatives and liberals are quite opposite of eachother. Liberals are into new ideas and fixing things as Conservatives are more traditional and don’t like change. Liberals believe that everyone should work together and rely on the government to fix their problems, on the other hand conservatives believe that things should be kept personal and problems should be solved on a personal level. Conservatives believe in a strong national security because without it we are open to be hit. Liberals think we invest too much money into our military and social security and believe we should make budget cuts.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reagan Interview

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My father informed me that a gentleman by the name of Paul Weyrich actually started the New Right, and was the one that was responsible for the success of the concervative policies since the 1970s. it was the second New Right that focused more on social issues and sovereinty. In this second New Right there were policies put in place that helped to dismantle the welfare system and even the restructuring of the national workforce that would help increase the economic flexability and the global market.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was taking while under a Liberal mindset. In order to understand the New Right Movement, defining these core beliefs can paint a picture of the Conservative movement. Individualism: The belief that an person has the right to express and enjoy there freedoms without fear of government involvement or oversight, thus making a person more self-reliant. This removes the use of government assistance programs, such as welfare, food stamps and Medicaid.…

    • 2756 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Opinion Analysis

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages

    (John, 2014) Conservatives are ideologically defined by their strict adherence to traditional values and practices as well as their support for little to no governmental regulation and their emphasis on individual citizens taking personal responsibility. Liberals are alternatively defined by their belief that the government should be active in the regulation of the people in order to protect the citizens from the possibility of unequal and discriminatory actions. (Rosalee & Zoe, p134) Liberals are also recognized by their beliefs in the overall equality of citizens, protection of liberties and progressive thinking that is based on the idea that there is overall an essential goodness to the mass populous. While there are vast differences between these opposing sides, it is possible to see how a person may agree with a conservative view of government while simultaneously believing in the humanist attributes of the liberal…

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Haidt’s video on moral dimensions he points out some differences that liberals and conservators have created from themselves. “Open Individuals have an affinity for liberal, progressive, left-wing political views, whereas closed individuals prefer conservative, traditional, rights wing views” (McCrae, 1996). The five main foundations of moral dimensions are categories in subcategories harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, in-group/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity. Harm/care is a natural instinct that we all carry from being mammals. We as mammals have neural and hormonal development already in placed. Therefore, allows us to bond with others, care for them, and gives us emotional feelings when others harms the ones you care for.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The New Right Movement

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The idea of economic conservatism was nothing new, but the leaders of the “New Right” movement such as Barry Goldwater believed that the policies brought forth in the New Deal should be reversed. The “New Deal” ideology was that America’s big government and bureaucracy were the biggest threat to the liberties of the average American. They believed that welfare and social spending had to be cut in order to reduce the tax burden on American families and citizens. The “New Right” movement believed that the government was failing the population, an excerpt from There are No Children Here provides a great example of this “Lafeyette had grown increasingly cynical. And in a child who has not experienced enough to root his beliefs, such an attitude can create a vast emptiness. He had little to believe in. Everyone and everything was failing him. School. The Public Aid Department. His father. His older brother. The police. And now, in a sense, himself.”(pg 222 Alex Kotlowitz). The ideology was that the federal government regulations were inhibiting personal freedoms as well as economic growth. The backbone of the “New Right” movement was financially backed by big…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Liberation Ideologies

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oppression and discrimination has existed and continues to exist in the past, present, and future history of the United States. The mistreatment of particular groups infringe on the idea that all individuals are free and equal. Liberation ideology strives to eliminate external and internal oppression of particular groups in both a formal and informal method in our legal system and society. This ideology believes in the freedom and equality of the individual. Similar to welfare liberalism, strong government interaction is necessary to eliminate oppression in the legal system. In our current bipartisan ideological government system, liberation ideology continues to face oppression and discrimination. Therefore, liberation ideology can only fully thrive and coexist within a welfare liberal democracy with strong government interaction. However, liberation ideology should continue to be embraced, despite our bipartisan government, as a utopian vision to remind members that what is current is not the limit to what can exist to ensure that there is individual freedom for all.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays