Preview

Is Killing Ever Justified Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Killing Ever Justified Analysis
Is Killing Ever Justified?

There's always an option to not kill someone. But the only times you HAVE to kill someone is when they're either out of control or you are in a life or death situation, but never should you ever kill someone for any other reason. If you feel the need to kill someone then you probably need to find or seek help. Killing is not the right answer, it's never the right answer.

To kill someone you have to be very crazy or insane. But their is a time where someone is acting out of control and someone need to do something about it, like in the book Of Mice And Men by John steinbeck George had to kill Lennie because lennie was getting out of control. Lennie needed to be stopped. But George didn't kill Lennie because he wanted to, he did it cause he had to. If he didn't kill him Lennie could have done more bad things.

When George kiled Lennie, that was the
…show more content…
I understand if they have mental disabilities but that doesn't give you the right to kill someone no matter what. Their is no right to kill someone at all, no matter if you're disabled or not. If you kill someone you should be punished. The only right you have to kill anyone is in self defense. Their is no other right to kill anyone.
Now there have been disabled people that have killed someone. They did get punished for it. And there's some that didn't even involve the disabled person and they got blamed for it. But blaming a disabled person for a murder is just below low. What i'm trying to get across is that you should never kill anyone for anything. Even if it's or defense try to not kill them. Killing should be justified. But it should not be justified only if you're using self defense, defense for someone else, or is someone is getting out of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case Study

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who has the right to kill another? In the case of Terri Schiavo this was the debate. Who was it to say that she was in a vegetative state and could never go back to the way she was again? Wasn’t there still a chance that she could make a recovery? Her feeding tube kept her alive, and she could’ve lived much longer with it. But what if it wasn’t the way she wanted it or she wasn’t happy? Her husband began giving up, but her parents wanted to keep fighting. Who is it to say if she will stay or go?…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that government cannot punish someone who does not know the difference between good and bad or cause and effect, because punishment would be worthless since the problem is in a one’s own mental. In support, Atkins v. Virginia was a Supreme Court closed on 2001 that states “executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the eighth amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who has intellectual disability”. This states that Wanda Jean Allen would have had a chance of mental rehabilitation or life in prison if court officials would have not bypassed her mental state. However, I still believe Wanda Jean would murder again because mental flaws are permanent. This can be heard in Allen’s last phone call before she was transported to the execution department, Allen was still very joyful and hope without expressing mercy of her own upcoming…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Gigi Jordan mercy killed her “8-year-old son” named Jude, who has autism, and “[reverts] to crawling”, she was saving him from physical harm that he could not protect himself against (Rosenberg). To the contrary, Lennie is a huge, strong, bull-like man that can crush someone’s hand with his grip. He is able to protect himself from harm because of his strength, and a professional wrestler is not able to take Lennie down in a fistfight. George shooting him does not fulfill the definition of euthanasia. If he is suffering, then someone could consider George killing him a mercy killing, but Lennie does not have any physical damage. Many times issues involving him usually come from him not understanding half of what is going on around him. He is a content man living a regular life. An eye for an eye does not work. George is blind because of his feelings, and murders his friend in the process. George murders a joyful and content man for the sake of his own self…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing justified? When is killing justified? Killing is justified because some people do things to get the death penalty. In the book (Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck) there are these 2 characters who get this job in California and the big guy, Lennie, kills the boss's son’s (Curley) wife. So George, went to find him and he shot Lennie because he killed Curley’s wife and it was either he kill Lennie or Curley and the others.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Its hard to figure out when you shoul kill someone for selfe defense but if you feel like your life is threatned, you should try to get out of there as soon as possible. Those are the only reasons I van think of for killing anyone after all an eye for a eye makes the whole world…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of death penalties, killing is an excusable act. “A society that fails to adequately protect and defend those who protect all of us is a…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing ever justified? Yes, killing is justified in certain situations. An example would be if a burglar comes into someone's house. The first thing they do is grab a gun or knife and use self defense. Some people will say no they should be punished people should not kill anyone under any conflict. Then, some people say just the opposite. Another example would be during a person's life time they can experience very painful illnesses. People should have the rights where they can die when they want only, if they are in a very painful stage of an illness or injury.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Men Essay

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, you never kill anybody! Especially your best friend in the back of his head with a gun for crying out loud! Killing somebody is against the law and is extremely wrong on so many levels. George took away Lennie’s life away after the blast from the gun. They could had just ran from Curley and the others and went somewhere lese but George had to do it. George had no right to do that and the way how he did it was like a murder. However the counter argument to this is that George ended Lennie’s life thinking they were gonna own a house and making Lennie seem happy.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a very thin line drawn in the debate whether or not death to another person is ever justifiable. There are so many different cases where I have a double sided opinion. I ultimately think that reasons for death such as euthanasia, abortion, acting in self-defense, etc. really depend on the circumstances of the situation. Webster’s dictionary defined murder as "the unlawful killing of another human being, especially with premeditated malice." What exactly is justifiable killing? Is abortion Okay? What about euthanasia, self-defense, war, or capital punishment? No I am not a believer in war, abortion nor do I think that taking another’s life is the absolute best decision. However if someone is putting your life or your loved ones life at harm, is that a reasonable clause, to use self-defense to protect your own life? I do believe it can be justified, but not always justifiable.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark George indicates in his article The Relevance of The Eight Amendment to the US Death Penalty in the 21st Century, that people with mental retardation faced high risks of wrongful convictions because they might make wrongful of false confessions. The case of Atkins v. Virginia is a clear example of cruel and unusual punishment. In 1996, the American Association of Mental Retardation declared Atkins mentally incapable. However, the court sentenced him to capital punishment. It wasn’t until 2001 that Atkins was exonerated of capital punishment due to his mental condition.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Behind the Crime

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Becarria, “individuals commit crimes because they have made a choice to do so.” (Aberle 46) I agree with this statement completely. It is an individual’s choice if they’re going to steal from an elderly lady down on Fremont, or kill the family that’s living in the house next door to you. Humans have full control of their body. However, if they have a mental illness well, that a different case. A mentally ill human is more vulnerable however, then a fully aware person. In some cases opposite from Becarria, I don’t agree with the death penalty. Becarria “felt that the death penalty, while cruel and excessive, was also an ineffective measure to reduce or punish crime.” We as a country can just go and kill people off. By making them feel completely secluded from the world I feel, is a better punishment. However, in slaughter cases, murder, do they deserve the death penalty? Maybe in some cases yes. The death penalty I believe should be used in a more high risk cases. On the other hand, the crime should be determined on how serious the crime was that the suspect has committed willingly.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just because you hyperbolically assert that I’m “conflating all kinds of different arguments” does not make it so. Twice I alluded to the opposing argument I hear most. Never did I suggest that is the only argument one could make. I said “As for those who would say that the DP is inherently murder …” and “DP opponents who argue that execution is murder…” There is no substantive difference in meaning. You are needlessly hung up on my use of the word inherently.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sue, A. P. (1998, Jan 25). Pro-death penalty but chivalrous texans debate fate of karla faye tucker. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/408352096?accountid=32521…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Murder Justifiable

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This universal phrase, used by Ghandi many years ago, is still used to reinforce the fact that if one murders another they don’t deserve to be killed. If people thought like this the human race would come to extinction. Many believe that if someone was to kill your loved one, you would have the right to kill in retaliation. If someone kills (who do they kill) do they deserve to be killed? The answer is no, because regardless why they killed there is no reason in continuing the chain of senseless slaughter. I can’t feel how many would have felt in a situation where there might be a strong reason to murder, but not many would want to have the burden of guilt for taking the life of anyone - even one who deserves it. This in of itself is damning, but with the justice system as well, which is harsh even on those who have committed “petite” crimes like robbing from a convenience store. Imagine the punishment for a crime as extreme as murder. From this we see that, even in the most extreme of cases, murder is not justifiable in any way.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays