Is Established Order Necessary?

Order is important in society because societies are formed around common identity, and more recently the people in some societies are very diverse and need a common goal or purpose to rally around. Order helps to establish institutions that are arranged based on certain principles that are held dear by those in the society. Governments enforce laws to help organize a society and keep those in a society safe. Without laws that hold everyone to the same accountability it would be hard to enforce order fairly or equally. Order in relation to the Social Contract Theory says that when the government abuses power, or the established order, the governed have to right to revolt: to overturn the established order, the established rules. Order is necessary but the question is at what cost is it necessary?
Violence always accompanies revolts, but
Shown with the American and French Revolutions, violence must have a clear defined goal of fundamental change of a government or it can turn poorly. During the French Revolution terror was used to justify the means of social change. Burke was really saying revolution and the violence that goes with it is not justifiable. Thomas Paine disagrees and views monarchy as evil and the solution is revolution to change the principles in place. Paine sees revolution, even when it goes south, as justifiable in monarchical countries because monarchies are inherently wrong. Whereas Locke has a safer middle ground saying if a government exercises “force without right” then the people have the right to revolution. Who gets to decide if force was used with or without right? Can anyone truly determine that with objectivity? The revolutions that took place after the Soviet Union fell, show that violence does not always go with revolution. Violence can be used to overthrow a