Preview

Involuntary Manslaughter Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Involuntary Manslaughter Research Paper
Manslaughter is legally defined as a crime of murdering an individual without malice, premeditation, and deliberation. Manslaughter is not considered a minor level of murder; however, it is not a serious crime than murder. Although it is not a serious crime, the actions committed is not excusable or justifiable, which severe punishment is implemented. In the Judicial system, the crime committed can be either voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. Voluntary manslaughter requires a criminal to cause physical harm or an engaged to murder, while involuntary manslaughter does not. Researchers determined that some states are recently dividing the offenses into varying levels instead of describing it. Premeditation and deliberation are not elements of manslaughter, but it does reflect the elements of murder. An adequate provocation is known for their suspect to commit a murder during the heat of passion. For example, Kimberly comes home after picking her kids from school, she catches her husband with another woman. She …show more content…
For example, a fight is provoked outside a nightclub, the offender is automatically expected to repel against the attacker with physical force. It is stated under the common laws that deadly force is never a justified action due to verbal confrontation. Another example is Mary being fired from work, which led her to kill her supervisor. Mary’s action would more likely be murder than voluntary manslaughter because people get fired all the time and learn to cope with it calmly. In conclusion, criminals can be charged through voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. In today’s society, some spouses engaged in adultery, which the event can be adequate provocation due to the heat of the event. Emotional breakdown is common when an individual commits a murder. In addition, some actions can be easily determined whether it is murder or manslaughter by the outcome of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The eighth amendment is designed to protect us from cruel and unusual punishment. Conservation of the United States Constitution, and all moral ideologies have been set aside. An old form of barbaric punishment and the saying "eye for an eye" is still being widely accepted by Americans today. The old form of barbaric punishment is capital punishment. No matter how "humane" the death penalty has become, it is still the killing of another human being. When people stand outside prisons and cheer that an individual was murdered, there is a problem. When people justify the killing of another person, there is a problem. Capital Punishment is irrefutably murder, and murder is never justified.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jaidyn Leskie Case

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In the law, the killing of another person could fall under two categories, one could be murder or it could be manslaughter.…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eastbourne manslaughter was an 1860 legal case in Eastbourne, England, concerning the death of 15-year-old Reginald Cancellor (some sources give his name as "Chancellor"[1] and his age as 13 or 14[2]) at the hands of his teacher, Thomas Hopley. Hopley used corporal punishment apparently with the intention of overcoming what he perceived as stubbornness on Cancellor's part, with the result that boy died from the injuries that were caused him.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adrian Crump Trial Case

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Manslaughter is a crime that is unjustified, inexcusable, and the intentional killing of a human being, whether it be involuntary or voluntary. This is the criminal charge that Adrian Crump from Jacksonville, Florida had to face. He shot a 15-year-old boy, around 2 in the morning, who was driving around shooting rocks from a slingshot. Adrian heard a noise in his home and thought it was a gunshot. He got up and checked it out, then went back inside and grabbed his gun as well as getting dressed. He then got in his car and pulled up behind the offender’s car, and shot the boy because he put his hands down, and he said he thought the kid was reaching for a gun. During the trial the prosecutor and defense team brought up the two sides of the story. We were asked how we felt about the trial and how we would find him. I took into consideration Adrian’s motivation or intention, self-defense, the witness’ statements, and crimes going on around the city.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    physical injury to others. It was found that use of deadly force to prevent escape is…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    X is guilty of negligent homicide. According to the Model Penal Code 2.02 (d), “A person acts negligently with respect to a material element of an offense when he should aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct”. Therefore, this is a negligent homicide because X BELIEVES that X can heal the sick by killing them. X did not killed Y by knowing that Y cannot be brought back to life. X have a lack of awareness since X has never actually performed spiritual healing before. If X previously has failed to bring a sick cult back to life, it would be relevant to my answer, in this case X would have an awareness that spiritual healing cannot bring a suck cult back to life.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    in 2006 the law commission said that the law regarding homocide was a rickety structure build upon shaky foundations and is in urgent need of reform.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manslaughter is considered a second-degree felony in the state of Texas. If convicted of this offense, people may be sentenced to imprisonment in the institutional division for between two and 20 years. They may also be fined no more than $10,000.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different legal categories of homicide. Two of these categories are; first degree murder and second degree murder. If the person acted with ‘malice aforethought’ or, planned to kill another individual and proceeded to carry out the act, then it is considered first degree murder. Shooting or stabbing someone in the heart, would be considered first degree murder, as the offender deliberately acted with malice aforethought, and therefore intended to kill the victim. Second degree murder is a homicide in which, the person did not intend to kill the victim, but still wanted to hurt…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hell Heaven Jhumpa Lahiri

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The list for causes of crimes could be enormous, from the fact that there are so many ways poor judgment can lead to someone else’s death or serious injury putting their lives at risk. It can lead…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locating a wrongful death lawyer after a loved one has passed away shouldn’t be time consuming or burdensome. In the event that you do need to locate one quickly, it is important to be prepared. There are many things to consider when a wrongful death occurs, such as what exactly constitutes wrongful death? If a death occurs due to someone else’s negligence, do I need to get an attorney to represent me in court? What kind of attorney should I choose? These questions will be addressed in this article to make sure you are fully prepared should you ever be in this situation.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay I will be discussing the case of David Bobby, Warden vs. Archie Dixon, I will express my feelings of the case and what caught made me interested in the case I selected. The sources, purposes and jurisdictions of the criminal law related to this case will also me mentioned within this essay, I will define accomplice liability and criminal liability and express how it relates to the case that I will be discussing. The difference between the various elements of crime, including Mens Rea, Actus Reus and Concurrence will be included in this essay with the relations of the within this case.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of the death penalty is to allow states the right to punish criminals with the highest possible punishment, death. People argue that it is morally wrong for the death penalty to exist, because it allows people to “play God.” Others believe that it helps protect our country from criminals and save lives. Due to this controversy, the death penalty has became a major source of debate in the United States.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The actus reus of this offence is any act which causes the victim (v) to apprehend an immediate infliction of unlawful violence (iiuv). No force need actually be applied, creating a fear is sufficient, as was illustrated by Logdon and Lamb. The v must fear that violence threatened is immediate, in Smith this was held to mean as part of the current activity, when the v was separated from the defendant (d) by a glass window.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays