Preview

Individual Rights and Public Order

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Rights and Public Order
We all have different views of what our rights as individuals should be. As individuals we should be able to choose how we live our lives. We have the first ten amendments in the constitution that states what rights we have as individuals. We have the right to bear arms, right to petition, right to free speech, and the right to remain silent. These are just a few rights as individuals we have been given by the government. All rights are privileges to freedom of action. You have the right to do what is essential to maintain your life. You have the right to do what on earth it is that makes you happy. Public order assumes freedom is important that every effort must be made to reduce crime. Public order provides a speedy and proficient way of justice for criminals. Public order helps get criminals be deprived of many rights afforded to people who actually obey the law. Public order is rights that protect the safety of our citizens. Public order makes sure that any criminal that has committed a crime is locked up for what they have done and can not be protected by their individual rights. Public order helps reduce crimes for citizens to live a safe life without having to worry about someone doing something to them. Public order values individual rights but suggests that the way to protect individual rights is to protect people from criminals even if that means the innocent people are mistakenly convicted. This essay is to make sure you understand what the meaning of individual rights and public order are along with the advantages and disadvantages of individual rights and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Framers Intent Paper

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA PARTIOT ACT “PATRIOT ACT” is an act of the US congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 16th, 2001. The act is a ten letter word that stands for Uniting (and) Strengthening America (by) Providing Appropriated Tools Required (to) Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorisms Act of 2001. This act also response to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. To reduce restriction in law enforcement agencies gathering intelligence with the United States. On May 26th, 2011 President Brack Obama used an autopen to sign a four year extension of three key provisions in the USA Patriot Act while he was in France. Congress shortly pass the Patriot Act after 2001. When terrorists attack USA by high-jacking four planes. They flew two of them into the World Trade Center towers in New York and another in to the Pentagon in Washington. The fourth plane crashed in Pennsylvania before it reached its target in Washington…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intent of the Framers

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual-rights advocate is someone who seeks to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. Their nature is to hold true what is written on the Constitution. A public-order advocate is someone who believes that under certain circumstances involving a criminal threat to public safety, the interests of society should take precedence over individual rights. Since September 11, 2001, many questions about individual rights versus public safety have arisen. The Patriot Act affects foreign travelers more than anyone, as it denies due process to a foreign visitor. This is unconstitutional as the American Government is supposed to grant due process to everyone. Law enforcement agencies must still obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance but probable cause is more lenient than in the past. Many people believe individual rights should be sacrificed for public safety but that is a dangerous move as if government is not forced to abide by the policies and procedures set by the constitution then government can become corrupt. Individual rights will trump public safety but you can still maintain a peaceful society without denying individuals their rights guaranteed under the constitution.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As our society enters into the 21 century, a fine thin line exists between individual rights and public order. What is public order? Public order maintains crime control and social order. Public order takes superiority over individual rights. Without public order, society would not even have any human rights; because crime would tend to take over. The public must realize that some sacrifices of individual rights and liberties has to be made in order to achieve and maintain a safe, stable society in which the individual may exercise those rights (Inbau, 1999). However, public order has its advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 2544 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The American judicial system 's need for an effective strategy to combat crime has been a continuously debated issue. While employing the adversarial models of crime control and due process, America struggles to find balance on a pendulum between individual rights and social order. In this window of opportunity, crime control and due process are examined and reflected into the eyes of society.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our legal system grants important rights to all of us. The reason criminal defendants have these protections is because every citizen deserves to be innocent until proven guilty. I believe that basic rights would be protected for individuals facing criminal charges; however, those who violate laws should face proper punishment for their…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system is an important aspect of American society along with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The purpose of laws is to protect society from harm, make certain everyone’s safety, and equally treated. The criminal justice system works to protect the innocent and punish the guilty without violating the rights the criminal suspect to avoid any injustices. As society develops the criminal justice system needs to evolve so it is important to create new laws to keep up with the evolution and new trends. As new trends and contemporary issues develop in society, they can have a straight impact on the different roles of the criminal justice system, such as technology, capital punishment, and sentencing policies, which have great effects the criminal justice system. Also the police, courts, and corrections play an important role ensuring justice.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    o one can truly say what the future holds. Will the supporters of individual rights or the advocates of public order ultimately claim the day? We cannot say for sure. This much is certain, however: Things change. The future system of American criminal justice will not be quite the same system we know today. Many of the coming changes, however, are now discernible—and hints of what is to come appear on the horizon with increasing frequency and growing clarity. Some of the more obvious of the coming changes are already upon us. They include (1) a restructuring of the juvenile justice system in the face of growing concerns about violent juvenile crime and spreading youth gang warfare; (2) the increased bankruptcy of a war against…

    • 18907 Words
    • 76 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout United States history, various groups have faced discrimination. The federal and state governments have taken actions that have either protected or limited the rights of these groups in American society. Two examples of groups that faced discrimination are Native American Indians and Japanese Americans. In both cases, theses groups have had their natural rights violated and were forced to move from their homes.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed Carry

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    "The right to defend yourself and your loved ones from criminals is fundamental, That is why it is vital for the people to be able to defend themselves and their loved ones should the need arise." Christopher W Cox and…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle between social control and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens can be seen in the Canadian Criminal Justice System of today. Many criticize policing institutions of possessing excessive power where others feel that they do not have enough. Some feel the police do too little where the others feel police are too much of an interference. The question of when it is acceptable to sacrifice social freedoms in hope of overall comes down to the question of which is more effective: due process or crime control? Is what more police what Canada needs to deal with its delinquents or is it more of the enforcing of our rights freedoms that is more important. This controversial issue plays a major role in the Canadian Criminal Justice System as it must come to a delicate compromise of social control and due process.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights and Freedoms

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What would it be like if we as American citizens did not have any rights or freedoms? Thankfully we will never have to worry about thanks in regards to our founding fathers and the Bill of Rights. In this essay I will discuss which freedom in the First Amendment to the Constitution is most relevant to me personally. I will also analyze and discuss the significance of the Bill of Rights and subsequent notable amendments to the U.S. democracy. Finally, I will discuss the process for amending the Constitution and give my opinion on whether it is a “fair” process or not.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Procedure

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Criminal procedure deals with the set rules governing the series of proceedings through which, the government enforces substantive criminal law” (Cornell University Law School, August 2010). The Federal Government, each state, and every municipality have their own criminal codes that define types of conduct that constitutes crime (Cornell University Law School, August 2010). Criminal procedure is shaped by both due process as well as crime control models. The most important purpose of criminal procedure is to maintain a proper balance between order and liberty. Order is the lawful limits put on the freedom of an individual to maintain the domestic tranquility which is necessary for the government to function properly and is necessary (Zalman, 2008). Liberty is a political theory that supports criminal procedure; it suggests that the purpose of the government is to allow an individual maximum freedom to chase after his or her individual goals, within the Rule of Law (Zalman, 2008).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Criminal procedure is the branch of American constitutional law concerned with the state’s power to maintain an orderly society and the rights of citizens and residents to live in freedom from undue government interference with their liberty” (Zalman, 2008, p. 4). The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendments are significant in studying criminal procedure. In criminal justice, the criminal procedure is important because it deals with the conflict between order and liberty directly. To understand the friction between order and liberty, Herbert Packer studied the competing values that underlie the constitutional order through the Due Process Model and Crime Control model. Both of these models have similarities as well as differences on shaping criminal procedure policy. Herbert Packer states, “One is not “good” and the other “bad”; both models embrace constitutional values that are necessary to the kind of society in which we wish to live” (Zalman, 2008, p. 5).…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics