Preview

Human Nature

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Nature
Human Nature
According to wikipedia.org the definition of human nature is defined as ʺHuman nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting that humans tend to have naturally, independently of the influence of culture ʺ. Everyone has a different say on what human nature is because we are all different and we all see human nature as a different thing. Part of human nature is each individual having their own identity, opinion and reaction towards things.
The Stanford prison experiment was performed so that the people running it could try to comprehend what human nature is. The purpose of the experiment was to determine whether people are more influenced by an “evil” environment than their own internal desire to do “good”. This experiment showed us that good people can snap under pressure and react to things differently than they normally would. Resulting to the conclusion that environment seems to have an impact on human nature and action. Also concluding that authority seems too often overrules ones internal desire to do “good”. The experiment was supposed to run for 2 weeks but due to certain events that happened it ended early.
What is good? Do we always do good? Why or why not? As human beings we are supposed to be able to tell right from wrong and good from bad but does that mean we always do what’s right or what’s good? In the Stanford prison experiment it shows us that good people can act differently under certain situations. Even though we intend to do good there are certain things that can twist our arm into doing acts or saying things we would normally never say or commit.
What do we consider to be bad? Growing up we all have different opinions of what we believe to be wrong and or bad. Some do wrong just to do it and that’s something I’ll never fully understand. I’m sure people have reasons as to why they do “bad”. Maybe what I consider to be bad is nothing like their beliefs. It really depends on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    GOOD AND EVIL. Are human beings as a species basically good or evil and what are the implications of the answer for H+. Personal!…

    • 5600 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Standard Prison Experiment This experiment shows how individual personalities could be engulf when they were given power and authority. Also, the individual were acting in a way that they thought was required, rather than using their own judgement. The experiment showed how subjects reacted to the specific needs of the situations, rather than considering their moral beliefs and thoughts. Based on my opinion one of the sign about how serious the subjects playing their role to continue this experiment was the release of the first prisoner.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various religions define good and evil in various ways. However, one thing is certain. Since our society has existed, good and evil have also been in existence and many religions see them as two sides of the same coin. Some religions see them as counterparts, one of which focuses on promotion of happiness and the other on everything evil or all that is contrary to happiness. Every religion and mythology define them in its own way and they find representation in various forms like demons and angels in Christianity and Devas and Danavas in Hinduism. But the concept of good and evil has always been there and in old times people considered everything that made them unhappy evil - even diseases - and everything that made them happy good.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of ones’ life, one encounters various forms of good and evil consistently. Often, examples of good and evil are not clearly defined, and this leads to difficulty in defining the distinction between the two. To be able to find the difference between the two terms, one must understand what each label really means. According to Google’s dictionary, good is defined as having virtue, righteousness, high morality, and integrity. On the contrary, evil is defined as pertaining to immorality, malevolence, and dishonorable actions. Although there are widely accepted definitions of good and evil, the final decision is up to the person facing the situation. In East of Eden, John Steinbeck…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is morally good is defined in different ways throughout the world. Race, society, moral beliefs, God, an individual, and also many others can determine what is thought to be good or bad. God as well as the individual defines what the good is.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good is perceived as manifestations of love, purity, salvation and goodness in the lives of people. Lesser good is judged to be evil. Frequently, the perception of good and evil is based on our own frame of acceptance. When we judge other people, we create a separation between good and evil. Such people believe their actions are based on clear reasons and understanding.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford prison experiment ,led by professor Philip Zimbardo, was aimed at seeing the effect on people on becoming prisoners or prison guards. The idea was to see what happens to people when they are put in relatively ‘evil’ places. Do the people themselves become evil or is there no net effect? The results indicated that in fact people adapt to their role exceptionally well. It was observed that the prison guards became overly tyrannical to the level of sadism. In consequence the prisoners were seen to be under severe stress to the extent that they became crazy or depressed.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Study

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This experiment was designed to depict how various situations can affect the behaviour and mindset of an individual. Within an extremely short timeframe it was evident that the mindset of the “prisoners” in this experiment was entirely altered to the point where they truly felt as though they were in jail. This experiment also indirectly indicated how power corrupts, as the “guards” also experienced an altered mindset.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and bad: there always seems to be a choice and an extensive gap between them, as if there is no grey area whatsoever. In literature and film, this frequently leaves two distinct and defining characters within them: the “good guy”, the protagonist, and the “bad guy”, the antagonist. Contradictive of the prior point, is the reality of life and people’s ability to choose right over wrong. Given the choice, most tend to do wrong for the simplest reasoning of having the ability to do so, or the fact that they believed they were justified in doing so, despite others believing the opposite from an overview of the situation. Although others may not agree with the reasoning, everything is justifiable and therein lies the grey area that confuses…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professor Philip Zimbardo, leader of the Stanford prison experiment considered three questions before initiating one of the most significant experiments to human phycology. He asked; ‘What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does the situation outside of you come to control your behaviour? Or do the things inside you such as your attitudes, your values and your morality etc. allow you to rise above a negative environment?…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What defines the right from wrong is the way someone is brought up. For example, if two completely different children were to be raised in the exact opposite environment of each other. One raised in a loving and caring environment; then the other raised in a hated environment where drug and abuse is all round them. Throughout the years of growing up in those environments, they will eventually form their minds on what is normal. Later in their lives if asked what they thought to be right and wrong in certain questions or situations. Theoretically, they will both answer differently from each other. The one raised in a loving and caring environment will say what everyone raised in the first-world will say to certain situations. Then the one raised in the hated environment where drug and abuse is eminent would probably say the exact opposite of what everyone else would not even think of.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal Worldview Essay

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Human Nature has always been interesting to me. It helps me to understand why I and others tend to do the things we do. My definition of human nature is the way we as humans react to situations or stimulus by default. I do not believe that all humans respond in the same way. I feel that we each act or react differently depending on our worldview, background, moral values, and personalities. I chose Human nature as one of my components because at times I struggle to understand why others act the way they do. My nature is to help others, I can remember even as a child I would go out of my way to give to others who needed it…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays