Preview

Howard Zinn's Arguments On The Mexican American War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
187 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Howard Zinn's Arguments On The Mexican American War
Howard Zinn argued that the Mexican American war was unpopular, not supported by most Americans and the Mexican American war was fought mainly for the purposes of expansion
Polk wanted California for America before anyone else could get it and many didn't want war, but war was the only answer to Polk
This passage shows that the soldiers didn’t want to fight the war any more, they even regretted signing up for the war, and they all wanted to just go home.
2) Yes, I believe Howard Zinn’s arguments, because during that time period, our soldiers didn’t really enjoy fighting, just stay in their homes and also I agree that the Mexican American war was fought for the purposes of expansion and Zinn perfectly described events that makes you see the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter Summaries of 'Occupied America': Chapters 3-5
    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Chapter Summaries of 'Occupied America': Chapters 3-5

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Review of James K. Polk and the Expansionist Impulse
    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Review of James K. Polk and the Expansionist Impulse

    Polk became one of the most aggressive and productive men to hold the U.S presidency. During his reign, a major event in his administration was the Mexican war that fit neatly with his expansionist policies. He was considered the last strong pre-Civil war president. Polk is widely noted for his successes in the foreign policy. Furthermore, he threatened Britain with war over an issue, in which the US owned the Oregon Country, after backing away over ownership of the Oregon region with Britain. Hence, during his tenure, the Oregon issue was solved between the US and Britain in which both states agreed to do partitioning of the Pacific Northwest at the 49th parallel. Eventually, the territory of the US extended to the Pacific Ocean.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico Justified To Go To War With The United States?
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was Mexico Justified To Go To War With The United States?

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Political Outcomes of the Mexican-American War
    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Political Outcomes of the Mexican-American War

    Ironically, the cause of the Mexican – American War was due to the politics of the U.S. President at the time, President Tyler. Tyler wanted to achieve a second term in presidency, but his name among the American people was not as well known in contrast to his opponent James K. Polk. President Tyler contemplated ways to make himself a more popular candidate, and came to a conclusion that would essentially foreshadow the coming of the war. He wanted his name to be associated with the thought of “American Expansion”, unfortunately he would never get that chance officially because he lost the election. However, in regards to his loss, he still had a desire to finish is initial plan. He went to Congress and made use of the Joint Resolution for an annexation, instead of a treaty. This will require a two-thirds majority agreement that Tyler did not have. On the last day of his term however, he would send messengers to Texas (which at the time was not a U.S. territory) for the purpose of immediate annexation. This would not sit well with the Mexican nation (Heys) .…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War DBQ
    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mexican American War DBQ

    One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    James K. Polk's Manifest The War Between Mexico And America
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James K. Polk's Manifest The War Between Mexico And America

    It was not that long ago the United States went to war with their neighboring country, Mexico. With James K. Polk being elected president of the United States in 1844, things were about to change for Mexico. A war was about to emerge that would make the United States a bigger and better country. Without the economic growth, Mexico lacked a strong Army to defeat the American Army and Navy to keep their land. Mexico would not give up their land without a fight. People believe that the United States had no right to start a war with Mexico and take a huge part of their land. With that being said, President Polk had other plans up his sleeve, a plan to take Mexican land from Texas to California.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cause of the War with the United States by Josefina Vazquez
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cause of the War with the United States by Josefina Vazquez

    Mexican historians have always viewed expansionism as the origin of the war. But the war left an uncomfortable feeling of not being able to deal better with Mexico's defense. Mexicans do not consider the origins of the war covered in mystery and they affirm that the war was caused by the insatiable ambition of the United States , aided by their weakness.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Catalyst Of The Mexican-American War
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Catalyst Of The Mexican-American War

    The Mexican-American War served as catalyst that channeled the divisions between the North and South and the division within the political parties. The war was fought over American expansion near Mexican territory, which created major tensions that resulted in full blown war in 1846. The war was very controversial because it raised sectional tensions between the different regions within the United States. Many in the North were opposed to the war because they believed it was being fought to expand slavery. Further, some viewed it as unconstitutional; one of the most famous protests was when Henry David Thoreau refused to pay taxes to show his opposition. When the war was finished, there was further division as to what the Unites States should…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Dbq Essay
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mexican War Dbq Essay

    On the other hand, some people say that the war with Mexico was justified. This point of view makes sense because in paragraph three of the background essay, it says that Mexico upset with losing Texas welcomed settlers from the United States into their country. However, the United States wasn’t justified in going to war with Mexico. Therefore, the war with Mexico wasn’t justified.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was The War Against Mexico Necessary?
    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was The War Against Mexico Necessary?

    “The war is waged against an unoffending people, without just or adequate cause, for the purposes of conquest; with the design to extend slavery; in violation of the Constitution, against the dictates of justice, of humanity, the sentiments of age in which we live, and the precepts of the religion we profess.” The war between the United States and Mexico had a lot of conflict between each other, and their tensions evolved over time. Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America´s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because of the increase in slavery, Texans had greedy actions, and President Polk provoked the war.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was The War Against Mexico Justifiable?
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was The War Against Mexico Justifiable?

    American expansionists sought new territory in the South and West, making conflict with Mexico seem inevitable. Both country wanted land and texas is already rebelling against Mexico. Texans wanted to be separated with Mexico because Texans thinks that Mexico's government is weak and their rules is too strict. Although the United States war against Mexico may be viewed as controversial, the war was just due to Texas, Government of Mexico, and Violence towards Americans.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mexican War Dbq
    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mexican War Dbq

    The Mexican war was a war worth fighting for a few reason. The first key reason that we should have fought this war is that it was in the best interest of the country at the time and the many people in the U.S. believed in manifest destiny which was the belief that the expansion of the U.S. was justified and important. Another reason that this war would have been justified is that at the time was that mexico was a fairly new country. They had only gained independence from spain about 20 years before the mexican war. The U.S. didn’t think that Mexico was capable of controlling the amount of land that they claimed as theirs. It said in Document A that, “Mexico never can exert any real government over such a country” A third reason that this…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    United States and Interstate Commerce Act
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United States and Interstate Commerce Act

    7 Zinn says that revolutionary movements at this time (1880s-1890s) were stimulated by “the recognition that day-to-day combat was not enough, that fundamental change was needed.” How do his accounts of the Homestead and Pullman strikes illustrate both the issues and the oppositional forces involved in such change?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mexican American War Research Paper

    According to Jesus-Velasco Marquez from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States,” he states that “mobilization of the U.S army was an outright attack on Mexico. As a consequence the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border, meaning the territory between the Rio Grande and the Nueces River.” This evidence shows the U.S was not justified in going to war because Mexico thought they were simply under attack by the U.S. America would have done the same thing if they thought they saw Mexicans crossing the land. It was all a misunderstanding until President Polk said that Mexico Murdered the 16 Americans on American soil.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    James. K. Polk
    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James. K. Polk

    “James was a leading contender for the Democratic nomination for Vice President in 1844. Both Martin Van Buren, who had been expected to win the Democratic nomination for President, and Henry Clay, who was to be the Whig nominee, tried to take the expansionist issue out of the campaign by declaring themselves opposed to the annexation of Texas.” With the other candidates saying this Polk disagreed and wanted it to be re-annexed. More people who wanted this expansion were more in his favor; therefore Polk gained more votes from this expansion idea. He was known for using “Manifest Destiny” to his advantage. “Even before he could take office, Congress passed a joint resolution offering annexation to Texas. In so doing they bequeathed Polk the possibility of war with Mexico, which soon severed diplomatic relations.” Polk was nominated on the ninth ballot due to this. He stood for expansion when the other candidates were against it.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics