Social Darwinism-philosophy that used Darwin’s survival of the fittest to justify war and conquering of stronger nations against weaker nations…
One more cause of the British imperialism was social. Social had to do with culture.…
While imperialism can bring social and economic growth it can also be taken too far leading to a power struggle. Smaller countries can be taken advantage of. Thus, others needing a justification for their actions. Countries can feel dominated by the power of others and end up giving up their sense of culture, customs, and even their identity. The basic justification for all countries was that it would provide a better and more productive way of life.…
Another cause of imperialism would be the social forces and ideas of other countries. For example, in document 4, the Britons believed they were the finest race in the world; the more the better. Even though this helped out the Britons it still caused many problems. Racism caused many problems such as killing innocent people and the false accusations of others (OI). Another social aspect would be social Darwinism. This was the teaching that stated only the strongest survive and you should do anything to get there (document 5). Social Darwinism is an ideology of society that seeks to apply biological concepts of evolutionary theory to sociology and politics, often with the assumption that conflict between groups in society leads to social progress as superior groups outcompete inferior ones (OI).…
Between 1898 and 1914, the United States had many strategic, economic, and ethnocentric motivations for practicing Imperialism. While America was imperialist mostly for strategic reasons, strategic and economic factors often coincided, and America’s motivations almost always had undertones of ethnocentrism.…
Imperialism itself happens for many reasons to the European community. It is embraced as a way to boost nations economies…
Beginning around the 1700s, under the development of technology in many aspects, the Europeans started their expedition to explore the world. After the discover of many unknown lands, they soon developed a policy to extend their power and influence through colonies, with violence and blood. The policy was known as “imperialism”. In Africa, European imperialists ruled, killed, enslaved, and traded millions of native Africans like merchandise while also robbing all the approachable natural resources. Imperialists apparently brought a catastrophe into Africa while they even caused a lot of leftover problems to the modern Africa. However, back to the 1800s, imperialists did not think imperialism was a fault. With better-developed technology, Europeans started to believe that they enjoyed superiority in all aspects, including economics, culture and race. They made up many justifications to defend their crimes that related to these three aspects. Most of the justification could be categorized into two camps: the “internal camp” and the “external camp”. In the “internal camp”, imperialists justified themselves by connecting “nationalism” and “imperialism”, which they believed ruling an “inferior race” was an efficient way to enrich their home countries. One of the related theories was “Social Darwinism”. The “external camp” believed the intention of imperialism was to help and benefit the “barbaric” natives. One of the popular theories was the “duty theory”. However, activist Roger Casement heavily criticized imperialism by using the same concepts. He disproved both camps by pointing that imperialism neither necessarily enriched nations nor brought any benefit to the natives. With his documentary report on the Congo Free State, which was privately controlled by King Leopold II of Belgium, we could observe the…
Throughout history, we have seen nations form under the common idea for unity and modernization of our country. As time continues, we see strong European countries imperialize other nations for wealth and foreign goods it can control. While some of the methods for gathering these materials were inhumane, unified colonies rose from their backbone of imperialism to become powerful countries such as Venezuela, India, and Canada. That is why a person should believe that imperialism was positive for human kind in the 1800s and early 1900s.…
Perhaps the biggest contributor to European imperialism was a pervasive feeling of elitism. The strongest of nations often felt that it was their right to continue being strong, and subjugation of the weak was necessary in doing so. Military leaders and bureaucrats traveled to foreign continents in an effort to thrive and expand. In the process of this, they learned more of native cultures, and found many of these foreign traditions to be distasteful.…
Imperialization came about through the necessity of resources for industrialization and began in the 19th century when industrial progress drove nations to search for new markets for their products. The competition that was fueled by these nations would have lead to all out war without treaties and agreements being made on the side of the conquerors, however, at no time did they consider the desires of the conquered. They did not just claim land, but create social structures similar to theirs, which they believed superior. Many Europeans believed that these “savages” should be civilized and in many cases a group of humanitarians brought in their christian god. These Ethnocentric attitudes led to beliefs of racism and a superiority the…
“evolutionary teaching [about survival of the fittest]” (Document 5). Survival of the fittest is a famous saying that most people know. The strongest live on, and the weak can be seen as just an obstacle. This relates to imperialism because, one main thing about imperialism is taking over another country, and the strong can only take over the weak. “more territory simply means more Anglo – Saxon race, more of the best” (Document 4). Being racist was a big thing during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They wanted their race to over populate and spread out. These were social aspects that forced imperialism during the nineteenth…
America became an imperialist nation because they wanted to make profit, make money. The nation wanted to be able to compete with others by selling raw materials in order to be one of the leading trade nations. America is always trying to make more money, so the government believed imperialism would bring some in.…
Have you ever wanted something because you felt you deserved it? Throughout history people have wanted to expand and take what they wanted. It is human nature to want things and set goals to acquire those wants. Imperialism was a proper and legitimate course of action for the U.S.…
Throughout history many countries have enacted upon a type of foreign policy known as Imperialism. The agenda of a country with an imperialist foreign policy is to increase the size, materials, or power of said country by use of force and or politics. Imperialism was a highly profitable foreign policy and caused cultural diffusion that assimilated many social/economical/political progressions to different countries and cultures. Around this time period many countries began to embark on their own imperialist foreign policy such as, the United States of America, Japan, Great Britain, Germany, France, and Spain. These countries all had different yet similar ideas on their own imperialistic ideas. But all of them were mainly sparked by the main…
This is a logical conclusion if you consider the military success of imperialistic entities such as the British or roman empires during the climax of their rule. Imperialistic policies can, as demonstrated by the roman, Nazi, and British empires, bring a short period of political and economic success far above what can be achieved by more democratic policies. However, the benefits of imperialism are almost always short lived and destroy the effected entity's stability for an extended period. Therefore, in long-term implementations such as considerations for the future of humanity, imperialism is not only counterproductive, but also…