Preview

How Did Otto Von Bismarck's Unify The New Type Of Conservatism?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1147 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Otto Von Bismarck's Unify The New Type Of Conservatism?
In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing …show more content…
In his 1869 speech, Liebknecht talks about how Bismarck is incorporating socialism into his reforms, but in his opinion, is not doing enough. This document shows how Bismarck is embodied the new type of conservatism by implanting socialism into his reforms. In addition, this document takes a strong bias as Liebknecht is a socialist, meaning he will only be happy and favor Bismarck if his reforms are only socialism, which Bismarck will not do as it will threaten his power. Document 3, a memorandum written by conservative Hermann Wagener in 1872, also critiques Bismarck, but from the standpoint of a conservative. Wagener expresses his dislike for Bismarck, whom he believes is fighting a losing battle against both the Church and socialism. Wagener’s memorandum shows how Bismarck is embodying a new type of conservatism by implanting socialism into his reforms and trying to suppress the power of the Church. However, Wagener’s memorandum, “Why the Government Cannot Ignore the Social Question: A Conservative View”, holds a strong bias as Wagener is a conservative meaning he will oppose Bismarck’s new kind of conservatism that goes against the traditional view of a strong government and Church. The reform that Wagener is so against is Bismarck’s social welfare system, which gives disability benefits and pensions to socialists, …show more content…
The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    HIST 531

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Leo von Caprivi- Was an German General who succeded Bismarck as Chancelor. He sepperated the office of Prussian Minister President and chancellor of the Reich which Bismarck previously held simultaneously. Under Caprivi’s system secretaries of state were given greater freedom and were allowed audiences with the Kaiser. Further Caprivi introduced the “New Course” which changed foreign and domestic policy towards conciliation with social democrats and a pro-british policy away from the Bismark policy. Caprivi was an ex‐military man who, as a result of this, Wilhelm II was quick to trust. He instigated his own ‘New Course’ – which aimed to ‘kill Socialism with kindness’. He wanted to allow some of the Socialists wanted, including re‐introducing Free Trade and extending the social welfare reforms put in place by Bismarck.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the impact of World War One took its toll on Europe countries like Russia, Italy and Germany were in dire need of a change. Germany was most impacted by the war and was left in a state where everyday citizens were homeless, jobless, and starving. Looking for someone save Germany, Germans were in a desperate need for change and turned to group of radicals that were rising in power at a rapid rate known as the Nazis. Looking for someone to “save Germany” the Nazi’s unconventional but radical beliefs gave many Germans a strong sense of hope. “One of the reasons the Nazi ideology was so successful in eliciting support for the party and consensus behind its program was that its structure was built central concepts that, in the…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of whether Wilhelmine Germany was an entrenched authoritarian state has been the subject of much debate. Those who have argued that it was have pointed mainly to the constitutional balance of powers to substantiate this view, which indeed appeared to give the Kaiser nearly complete authority over German politics. Some historians such as Wehler have offered an alternate version of the argument that Germany was ‘authoritarian’ by suggesting that it was in fact elites, such as the army and judiciary, who controlled German politics. However, other structuralists have argued that mass political movements were consistently growing throughout the period, and did in fact have influence over politics, and as such if Germany was to some extent authoritarian, this authoritarianism was by no means entrenched. In this essay I will discuss these…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He realized the political and geographical chaos within Germany after the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815. This was greatly due to the high number of local battles and internal wars within the un-unified Germany. The existence of these struggles was mainly because, through the congress’s “balance of power”, European powers were limited to reduce the possibility of the uprising of continental strength which might oppose a threat to Europe. Bismarck, being and opportunistic politician did not like the situation of anarchy and took in hand the responsibility to unify Germany, and by mass election of the people he up rose in between the mid 19th century. This characteristic trait and behaviour made him an untrustworthy figure in the eyes of his political allies, why? Simply, they worried that such an opportunistic symbol such as Bismarck would un-doubtfully take advantage of a vulnerable situation, like he did in Germany, and introduce a setback, which in turn may misdirect Germany threat to neighbouring areas, leading to continental feud, thus damaging local trade through mercantilism, political alliances such as that between Austria and Prussia, and future democratic recessions such as those in the north German Confederation of the year 1876. Otto Von Bismarck was now the Machiavellian politician who kept the European powers on high alert through the process of signing treaties and…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1871 and 1890 Otto Von Bismarck had worked hard and skillfully to secure Germany's position in the European hierachy. Alliances formed between Germany and other nations such as Russia and Austria cemented peace within Europe during the 1870's and 1880's, and Germany's isolation of France (whom Prussia had defeated in 1871) could continue. The use of realpolitik showed a government that was progressive and willing to compromise. What Germany needed after Bismarck had served his time, was a leader who could maintain alliances but still take Germany forward. However decisions such as ousting Bismarck from his position as Chancellor, served only to highlight Kaiser Wilhelm II's intention to actively seek a personal rule based on his 'divine right of kings' , that would disgruntle the percariously balanced situation in Europe.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Bismarck was the shining leader of the shining Germany during the years 1862-1890. At the time Germany was a new country where Bismarck was in charge for many things that happened inside and outside the country. He was responsible for unifying the country by using different policies. Bismarck was a conservative, which meant that he didn’t prefer changes and he felt like god made the system. As a leader Bismarck made clear that the goals of the state were more important then any other concern. In spite of this the diplomacies he used were usually planned short-term wisely, which could cause a problem for long-term settings. His most important goals were going to war with other countries, keeping peace in Europe, and of course his smart politics had a major impact in the growth of German industry.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three sections in Crankshaw’s Bismarck: Bismarck going into politics, unifying Germany as Chancellor, and the aftermath of the unified Germany. Bismarck is one of the few men in history that could pull this off and be that successful. He united a lot of different cultures and became one of the most powerful leaders in all of Europe and his new German almost controlled the continent.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany Under Bismarck

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of Bismarck over the years has changed and it is the historical debate surrounding our perception of him and his intentions that often shapes our interpretation of the German unification. No 19th century figure has attracted the attention and controversy that surround the achievement of Otto von Bismarck, with the exception perhaps of Napoleon Bonaparte. The success of Bismarck's work in unifying Germany has shifted from a determinist to a dialectic approach.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays