Preview

Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Nirvani McKinney
POL 201 American National Government
13th August, 2012
Instructor: Teri Kuffel

The history of Habeas Corpus and the war on Terror
In this paper I will be diving in to the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has evolved over the years. I will briefly explain the origination of the habeas corpus, the role it plays in U.S.A and what current action is being taken about it. I will be also looking in to the Bush administration and the way they dealt with habeas corpus.
The original purpose of habeas corpus "was to bring people into court rather than out of imprisonment" and by the year 1230, the writ 's utility for that purpose was a well-known aspect of English common law. Known as "the Great Writ," its codification into English law came by way of Parliament in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1641, created in response to the King of England 's actions during what is now referred to as Darnell 's Case. In Darnell, five English noblemen were thrown "into the castle 's dungeon deep" for failure to support their country 's dual wars against France and Spain. The men filed suit, requesting the King provide an explanation as to their imprisonment. King Charles refused, on review; the court upheld the monarchy 's steadfast silence, stating that the law did not require the King to provide any justification for their detention. The public outcry against this decision was deafening, prompting Parliamentary action the following year. Parliament expanded habeas rights several years later with the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, additionally requiring "charges to be brought within a specific time period for anyone detained for criminal acts." By 1765, habeas corpus was firmly imbedded within the foundation of English law, as noted by William Blackstone, who described the Great Writ as "a second magna carta, a stable bulwark of our liberties." This fundamental English right successfully traversed the Atlantic Ocean when our founders



References: Anderson, K. (2006). Law and terror. Policy Review, (139), 3-24. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216453983?accountid=32521 JACKSON, A. L. (2010). HABEAS CORPUS IN THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR: AN AMERICAN DRAMA. Air Force Law Review, 65263-288. obban, M., & Halliday, P. D. (2011). Habeas corpus: From england to empire. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(2), 257-269. doi: 10.1017/S1744552311000085 Pond, B. C. (2009). Boumediene v. bush: Habeas corpus, exhaustion, and the special circumstances exception. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2009(6), 1907-1933. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194363601?accountid=32521 Robertson.J. (2002). Habeas corpus the most extraordinary writ. Center for the Preservation of Habeas corpus, Retrieved from: http://www.habeascorpus.net/asp/ Staab, J. B. (2008). The war on terror 's impact on habeas corpus: The constitutionality of the military commissions act of 2006. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, (8), 280-297. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213962970?accountid=32521

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention, the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two months before September 11th and could have not received military training. The Special Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michael Mobbs, issued a response, outlining the Government’s position. The district court found the “Mobbs Declaration” insufficient in supporting the Government’s case. The Mobbs Declaration provided details regarding Hamdi’s trip to Afghanistan, his affiliation with the Taliban during a time when the Taliban was battling U.S. allies, and lastly his surrender of an assault rifle. The District Court found that the Mobbs Declaration, standing alone, did not support Hamdi’s detention and ordered the Government to turn over numerous materials. The Fourth Circuit reversed, stressing that it was undisputed that Hamdi was captured in an active combat zone, no factual inquiry or evidentiary hearing allowed Hamdi to be heard or to rebut the Government’s claims were necessary or proper. If the Mobbs Declaration was accurate, it provided a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that the President had constitutionally detained Hamdi, the court ordered the habeas petition dismissed. The appeals court held that, “no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress”. This provides that The AUMF’s “necessary and appropriate force” language provided the authorization for Hamdi’s detention. Also that Hamdi is entitled only to a limited judicial inquiry into his detention’s rationality under…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    S. G. F. (September, 1888). The Suspension of Habeas Corpus During the War of the Rebellion. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will prove that civil liberties, in America, during times of war, should not be suspended. This paper will prove this point by discussing the impact of the Japanese internment camps in the 1940’s, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and more contemporary examples such as the Patriot Act that occurred after the 9/11 attacks. However, the main case examined will be the Japanese internment camps.…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life and the End

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Find a case that dealt with a writ of habeas corpus, briefly relate the facts of the case, and explain how a writ of habeas corpus was an issue in the case.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right of Habeas Corpus

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Right of Habeas Corpus is derived from the Latin meaning “you have the body. The meaning according to the U.S. Constitution is the right of any person to question their incarceration before a judge. The violating of this right has not been the most severe of the civil liberties granted to not only Americans but many other countries. The biggest violation of this right was when the Busch administration held hundreds of suspected terrorist from the Afghan and Iraqi terror attacks of 9/11. The first real act of Habeas Corpus comes from the passage of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 through 1915. At that time the court denied Leo Frank this right during a murder trial. Some other interesting evolutions of this act throughout history are Lincoln 's Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus this was a historical moment for this right of the constitution. “Lincoln 's power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus was extensively explored during the Civil War, but since then his suspensions have escaped detailed scrutiny despite the controversy they provoked, their widespread and effective use to combat malignant opposition to the war, and their uncertain grounding in the Constitution.” Under the Constitution the federal government can unquestionably suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus if the public safety requires it during times of rebellion or invasion. The issue is whether Congress or the president holds this power. I think this is why during the 9/11 attacks President Bush felt he could detain all those people because of this right.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During times of war the role of the president’s is responsible for martial law. The military plays a role in the martial law because it is too make sure everything is governed correctly. Habeas Corpus is established so that a person can know what their charge is. However, if the defendant claim is denied the Supreme Court will take control over the trial. The United States has being the target of several terror attacks. Habeas corpus is an important civil right that should be given to those accused of committing acts of terror.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus Limitations

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in the case of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” The statement may seem fairly straight forward in that all citizens shall have the right to have their case heard by a judge unless they are considered war criminals or the possibility of the person being released would be a hazard to public safety. There are still many debates about this passage in the Constitution on what if any limitations can be presented to the exceptions. These debates…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habeas Corpus is simply defined as recourse in law that may be applied before a court in cases where the unlawful detention or imprisonment of a person is suspected. (Wikipedia) A writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody. (Lexicon) A habeas corpus petition can be filed to a court by a person who objects to his or her own or another’s detention or imprisonment. Think about pervious wars we have endured. How many detainees have been detained and questioned then released? Many Presidents have tried to deny…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics