Preview

Gun Control Pros and Cons in the United States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Pros and Cons in the United States
The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists counter with the anachronism of the 2nd Amendment, the traditional definition of “militia” as a government-authorized army, the multitude of gun-related deaths, the need for stronger regulations, and the precedent England has set with their ban of handguns. Both sides of the issue present a compelling argument, and need to be looked into carefully before any decision can be made.
Opponents of gun control legislation often cite the 2nd Amendment, which states that citizens of the United States have the constitutional right to own firearms. This portion of the Bill of Rights has been repeatedly upheld by court cases in the Senate and House of Representatives. On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that “the Second Amendment, part of the 10-amendment Bill of Rights adopted shortly after the Constitution itself, guarantees the right of individual U.S. citizens to possess and use firearms for traditionally lawful purposes” in a 5-4 vote (Hunter). The Constitution is regarded by the Court as the highest law in the country, historically taking precedent over any other legal document, sometimes resulting in the nullification of laws regarded as unconstitutional. Gun rights advocates argue that gun control laws are unconstitutional



Bibliography: "Gun Facts." Entry. Web. 13 Feb. 2010. <http://www.gun-control-network.org/GF01.htm> Heston, Charlton, and Sarah Brady. "The Second Amendment: A Closer Look." American Legion Magazine Feb. 2002: 12+. SIRS Researcher. Web. 11 February 2010. Huelsman, Melissa. "Gun Control Is Constitutional." Current Controversies: Guns and Violence. Ed. Henny H. Kim. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1998. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. THE WOODLANDS COLLEGE PARK HIGH SCHOOL. 9 Feb. 2010 Hunter, Bridget. "Highest U.S. Court Examines, Interprets Constitutional Right." America.gov Press Release 02 Jul 2008: n.p. SIRS Government Reporter. Web. 11 February 2010. "News Flash: Criminals Ignore Laws (including Gun Control Laws) |  ." LearnAboutGuns.com. Web. 13 Feb. 2010. http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/06/12/news-flash-criminals-ignore-laws-including-gun-control-laws/ Ring, Ray. "Guns R Us." High Country News (Paonia, CO) Vol. 39, No. 14 Aug. 6 2007: 10-17. SIRS Researcher. Web. 11 February 2010. SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C.J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms, or keep weapons. This means that our forefathers made sure that legally we would be able to have the right to protect ourselves. According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Self-defense is a fundamental right.” (Pros). Almost half of Americans agree with this statement, and 67 percent of people who own guns claim that…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Similar to that of the Second Amendment, argument is between those who are pro-guns versus anti-gun. Pro-gunners are advocating for, not more lenient laws but simply, that the government attempts to better enforce the laws that are already in existence. Comparatively those who are questioning the validity of the Second Amendment are appealing to the government to place stricter restrictions on the ownership and distribution of guns. Those who are pro-gun are supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the United States, whose arguments, based in the right to “freedom” as according to the Second Amendment, are directly hindering the progress of gun control. The NRA claims that “there are currently more than 20,000 firearms laws in the U.S., clearly more than enough to punish criminals who misuse firearms, but the laws have to be enforced” (Braga 2001, 545). However many of these 20000 laws are restricted by others, thus making them unenforceable and furthermore, many of these laws were created with the intention to be difficult to enforce (Braga 2001, 546). The NRA has undermined many of the laws in place by the “sponsoring of legislation that undermines the ability of the ATF agents to build cases against unregulated private sellers involved in firearms trafficking” (Braga, 2001, 546). Those involved in the making of laws towards…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Molly Ivins writes an argumentative essay upon the controversial topic of guns. She begins her argument that she is in fact not antigun, but believes other forms of protection such as knives and martial arts are more practical for self defense. She supports her argument with the second amendment in the Constitution by breaking it down word for word and its literal meaning. Ivins goes into everyday life and how many people misconstrued the meaning of the second amendment and its correlation to gun use. Finalizing her argument, states her idea that guns should be regulated with strict policies.…

    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debacles

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    The purpose of this paper will give a historical background of the gun control debacles in the United States, and will focus on gun control and the Second Amendment, the historical context of the Second Amendment and the legitimacy of gun the control legislation, America’s most dominant gun control movements since 1980, as well as presenting the effects they have had on the American public by analyzing different approaches state-by-state across the U.S., to understand if there is a correlation between the number of firearms, and killings committed by guns.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only through the blatant abrogation of explicit constitutional rights is gun control even possible. It must be enforced with such violations of individual rights as intrusive search and seizure and the most severely victimizes those who most need weapons for self-defense. With various gun control proposals on different agendas with the including of licensing, waiting periods, and bans on “Saturday night specials” are of little or if any value as crime-fighting measures because with the banning of guns to reduce crime makes more logic as banning alcohol to reduce drunk driving and with the persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nisbet, Lee PhD. Editor. The gun control debate you decide. pp 391. 2001. Prometheus books.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently over the past few months the case for and the strength of having stricter gun control laws has become a household debate. The facts given in my research will point out the views from both sides of the proverbial coin, and show how gun control in America does not belong in legislature. There are many issues Americans are fighting to uphold; many think tightening gun control laws are unconstitutional and violate our Second Amendment rights, others think tightening gun control laws would make America safer.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Are Bad

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Volsky, Igor, and Mark Glaze. "Firing Back at the Gun Lobby ." U.S News & World Report. N.p., 14 Mar. 2017. Web. 10 May 2017…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Control

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schumer and Presser go on to say that when the short burst of public outcry is over, attention fades from the issue of gun control until the next mass shooting occurs. Schumer and Presser, like Kleck, attribute this loss of attention to the fact that the proponents of gun rights are often more passionate about protecting their rights than proponents of gun control are passionate about regulating guns (2013, 2). Additionally, Robert Wolpert and James Gimpel argue that gun owners are concerned with protecting their self-interest, which is why gun owners are often opposed to stricter gun control regulations (1998, 241). With this understanding, one can see the perspective of those that oppose stricter gun control regulations. With understanding of the opposing side’s perspective, one can be more prepared to refute the opposing argument. For this reason, the articles written by Schumer and Presser and Wolpert and Gimpel are extremely beneficial when preparing to refute the other side’s…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prohibition never stopped the production and transportation of alcohol, it just made it a challenge and that's pretty much what gun control is doing for the criminals. Even in gun free zones like Virginia tech guns still show up here and there. Criminals don't have to use guns to commit murder, they can use a knife or a grenade or nuclear weapons but the government is only looking at guns because they are used the most often because they make it easier to commit a murder or a robbery. Some people think that if more people in the world had guns there would be less violence because the criminals would be scared to mess with someone because they don't know who has a gun that they will use against them and who doesn't have a…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America, is admittedly going through many low points and difficulties with the infrastructure of the government. One of the most prevalent controversial issues among the government and its citizens is where the hypothetical “line” is drawn with gun control. Gun control presents itself as a point of valuable authority in the government to some, and also continues to be an enormous problem to others. This argument between the government and its people clash over the matters of possession and confiscation of firearms, the Constitution’s content and the position it takes to back up the issue, what the future holds for gun owners, and if the stricter control of firearms by the government actually reduces the amount of crime…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays