Preview

Gun Control Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Cons
Gun control has sparked quite a controversy over the years. Some people believe that having strict gun control is the only way to fix the problems. While others, including myself, believe it is more a problem with the person that is behind the trigger. There has been laws about gun control as early as 1934. as citizens, we need to ask ourselves if having gun control will solve all the issues at hand. With both arguments, there is facts to support. I believe that gun control will not have the ability to make all the problems go away, there needs to be more done.
One part of the National Firearms Act of 1934, the first federal gun control law, which levies the restrictive $200 tax on the manufacture sale of machine guns and sawed-off shotguns.
…show more content…
One being the Second Amendment was intended for militia. The do not find it completely necessary to have guns for the safety aspect. In the hopes of making guns harder to get, it would reduce gun violence. Another big thing that gun control will hope to control is the amount of suicides. Gun control would be used to help lower mass murders, which is easily done with automatic weapons. They choose to think that all security and their power might offer anyone is security of mind-which, to many, is not worth all the cons of unmonitored gun access and use.
Opponents of gun laws believe no matter the restriction, unstable people will do as they wish regardless of how hard it is. These laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws. The Second Amendment to these select groups of people is perceived quite differently that the proponents of gun control (Sager). They believe that the amendment protects individuals rights to own guns. Many people against these laws feel it could infringe upon the right to self defense and deny people the sense of safety, infringe upon the right to own guns for hunting and sport
…show more content…
People can commit terrible crimes and not be a criminal or mentally ill. Growing up on a farm, I was around guns a lot. With that being said, I was also taught how dangerous they were. I was always directed to never play with them or use them if not instructed to do so in a safe environment. People will kill people regardless. You put a law on guns, sure it will lower the rate for awhile, but it will never rend it. They put the word “illegal: in front of many drugs and they are still used everyday. I believe we should look past the guns and see the people behind them. Banning guns is the easy way out, the problem here isn't guns, it is people losing the values of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone doesn’t have a firearm, there is a 100% chance that people will not be in danger of getting shot. This is a fact but other individuals believe that they have a right to have a gun because it is needed for protection against killers and local criminals. According to procon.org, '' The Second Amendment, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This is where the controversy of gun control begins and the pros and cons being explored. The pros of gun control includes the decrease of deaths, prevents a violent conflict it protects women from domestic abusers, it prevents mass murders and make the environment less dangerous. The cons of gun control includes: Gun control laws would prevent citizens from protecting themselves from foreign invaders, Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety and education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths than having gun…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns and Cons

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, letting people make uncontrolled gun purchases creates a dangerous and chaotic environment for other people. In my opinion, people having gun with them are so many that, it is dangerous to wander in public places such as; streets and parks, because when people especially 18 or 19 year old people have guns, anything can happen anytime. If we consider the rate of young people with guns increase every other day, inevitable events occur. For example, at the premiere of "Batman" in Colorado in summer 2012, a 24 year old gunman opened fire on the people in the theater in the middle of the movie and killed 12 people there. In fact, that is when the government started to consider the gun laws, but the issue is still suspended.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment to the Constitution relates to the right to bear arms. Even so, many believe that without guns, there would be a huge reduction in homicides. Proponents of legalization of guns believe that people themselves are the problem. Guns should remain legal because it gives individuals the ability to protect themselves, their homes, and their families.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Second Amendment is a big part of gun control. The second amendment is a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the wake of multiple shootings such as the theatre shooting in Aurora, Colorado, should U.S. gun control laws be reformed, or would that result in the violation of constitutional rights? From the day the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791, giving U.S. citizens the right to carry firearms, the issue of gun control has been the subject of many debates. And the effects of more strictly regulated Gun control would be detrimental to our society. Gun control is unreasonable for the following reasons: 1) the right to own and carry weapons is granted by the Constitution and upheld by the Supreme Court, 2) the majority of U.S. gun owners…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws take away the right to self defense and take away their feeling of safety. If a person doesn’t have a gun, when attacked they have a higher chance of dieing. “A small women is armed with a knife and the large man has a knife, he is more likely to win, but if she has a gun she gets to live another day” (Cooke, 26). This is an example of why the 2nd amendment is needed. “The 2nd amendment does protect the individual right of law- abiding,…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest controversial topics in America today is Gun Control, whether we should or should not have gun control. The Government claims that if they take the guns away, that there will be a drop in deaths and crimes. The Second Amendment state that every citizen of the United States of America has a right to bare arms(ProCon#1). The Gun Control Law will take away that right completely, along with some of our freedom. If the Gun Control Law is enforced in the United States, our hunting right will be removed, our self-defense right will be taken away, and it will amplify the problem.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays