Preview

GoldmanSachsGoingToTheOracle

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
GoldmanSachsGoingToTheOracle
Going to the Oracle: Goldman Sachs, September 2008
1. Description of the situation

Goldman Sachs, one of the most important financial institutions in the US suffered from the historic financial crisis in 2008, particularly because of the demise of insurer AIG given the systemic disruption in the markets and the collateral damage provoked by trading operations with AIG.

Even if the company had a strong record in risk management avoiding market downturns, this situation caused Goldman Sachs stock price to to decrease and banks stopped lending money even among them.

The company raised $5 billion from Warren Buffett through Berkshire Hathaway, which triggered the influx of $5.75 more in common stock from the public market. 2. Why did Goldman raise capital when it did?
Goldman Sachs decided to convert to a banking holding company, which would allow it to have more stability and liquidity through the Federal Reserve, with more regulations and protection.
Goldman was short in capital supply and it needed to increase its capital base to improve the liquidity of the company at the time of the crisis and the weak market conditions.
Very importantly, they needed to restore market confidence and getting the capital from Warren Buffett, easily the most respected investor, would give an endorsement and validation from the ‘Oracle of Omaha’, diminishing any doubt about Goldman Sachs liquidity position.

3. At the end of Q3 2008 was Goldman over or under capitalized?

At the end of Q3 2008, the company was Over-Capitalized.

4. Who got the better deal? Buffett or Goldman?
Warren Buffett got the better deal 50,000 shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock with a liquidation value of $100,000 per share and a 10% annual dividend. He got the option to buy stock at a discounted price: warrants to buy $5 billion of common stock for $115 a share at any time in the next five years. Basically, just by buying stock he would be able to get his investment back fairly easy.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bear Stearns Case Summary

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    reputation as one of the most aggressive traders on Wall Street and like his predecessors he…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The stock of a global investment company, Bear Stearns, began to drop drastically on March 10th, 2008. A share of Bear Stearns was as high as $171 and by the afternoon dropped to $57. Former CEO of the company, Ace Greenberg, tells CNBC that all of these rumors are “ridiculous.” As time goes on, Bear Stearns’ cash reserves were disappearing and people invested in the company were immediately withdrawing. Bear Stearns was basically racing to find a company to buy them out or they would go under. Current CEO of Bear Stearns, Alan Schwartz, got ahold of JP Morgan’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, to buy out Bear. A ton of government officials come to Bear to look over their records and it is not a pretty sight. Bear was deep in toxic assets. The Federal Reserve was prohibited from lending any money to Bear so they used JP Morgan to bail out Bear Stearns. Unfortunately the company could not be saved and Bear Stearns was gone after being sold to JP Morgan at $2 per share.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Job

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the reasons for the crisis was because of immoral decisions. After The Great Depression the industry was tightly regulated. Everything was fine for 40 year’s up until the 1980’s when Don Reagan, newly appointed Treasury Secretary and former Meryl Lynch CEO, pushed for deregulation. Without oversight, companies such as Meryl Lynch, and others like Goldman Sachs, started making risky investments. This is one of the reasons why the film made me angry, but also helped me realize what actually happened. We saw these companies start to become huge and gain more power, which in turn was one reason that led to the financial crisis. In my eyes they are responsible for some of the wrongdoings because if we were still regulated, the chances of the financial crisis would have been slimmer.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, Goldman Sachs and other big banks such as Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan Chase have been pushing their way into the commodity business by buying warehouses, oil refineries, power plants, and other physical infrastructure. According to an article by The Editorial Board from the New York Times, Goldman Sachs’s Aluminum Pile, “They have been able to do so because American lawmakers and regulators have removed many of the barriers that historically separated banking and commerce.” The banks involved and supporters claim they should be allowed to buy sell commodities on a large scale because it is closely related to their trading activities, however, the banks could take an unfair upper hand using their knowledge in the physical market to assist them when trading in the finance market with Exchange Traded Funds.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the banks first created the swaps, it gave investors the opportunity to invest in bank loans. From there, banks sold derivatives on all portfolios by synthetic investment. Investors were able to invest in credit default swap and make it grow. Credit then became a more available asset which stroke employment. Now all banks wanted credit derivatives; which are privately held negotiable contracts that allow consumers to manage their exposure to credit risk. The main problem with this was they assumed risk could be eliminated, but it couldn’t. In order to regulate derivatives, Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act in 1933 to establish deposit insurance, and implemented a number of banking regulations. As learning in class, this affected every business in America. There was now a high rating, and high yield. The big return was bankers now bought bundled mortgages. Homebuyers were able to pay double, but lending was too much; making people going bankrupt in home mortgages. Borrowers gave loans greater than the value of that loan, which made the financial bubble burst, creating a recession. With bankers ignoring all the possible risks from the beginning, they feel into a deep crash. Goldman Sachs was the only bank to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cited: "A Brief History of Goldman Sachs." Wall Street Journal. N.p., 19 Apr. 2010. Web. 3 Nov. 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704671904575193780425970078.html>.…

    • 3056 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Northern Rock’ Crisis

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The bank went to FTSE 100 index in 2000. However it was downgrade to FTSE250 in December 2007 because the crisis that has been faced. The bank caught crisis by subprime mortgage financial crisis that happen at US. Consequence of the crisis, the bank has credit markets problems. It need more cash to support their running business. It received liquidity support facility from Bank of England. The reasons bank get into crisis because the subprime mortgage that have been face by Lehman Brothers. The bank had moved to make a deal with Lehman Brother before, which the risk was being underwritten by Lehman Brothers.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goldman Sachs

    • 4002 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The principal conclusion is that Goldman Sachs made a number of errors especially when dealing with its investors; not disclosing vital information on time.…

    • 4002 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glass Steagall Act

    • 3028 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Commercial banks were accused of being too speculative in the pre-Depression era, not only because they were investing their assets but also because they were buying new issues for resale to the public. Thus, banks became greedy, taking on huge risks in the hope of even bigger rewards. Banking itself became sloppy and objectives became blurred. Unsound loans were issued to companies in which the bank had invested, and clients would be encouraged to invest in those same stocks.…

    • 3028 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warren Buffet

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Critically assess Buffett’s investment philosophy. Be prepared to identify points where you agree and disagree with him.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Hazard

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    So the banks favored the short-term profitability without thinking of the long term consequences of their decisions because they were convinced they could not fall. The banks then took advantage of their importance and jeopardized the entire economy…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Assignment econometrics

    • 41688 Words
    • 167 Pages

    15. ^ Wall Street in crisis: Last banks standing give up investment bank status, The Guardian, September 22, 2008…

    • 41688 Words
    • 167 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In early September 2008, there was considerable credit crunch and difficulties in obtaining interbank loans, though the prize on American Treasuries in the commercial paper market and the interbank was below the average of the previous year. The demise of Bear Stearns by its acquisition by J.P. Morgan had established the view that there were financial organisations that were too big to fail, like investment banks. Creditors recovered money and were just punished shareholders, who recovered less than 10% of a year before actions had. Therefore, he evaded the deepening of systemic hazard, but evading moral risk of shareholders. This condition transformed considerably on September 15 after the liquidation of Lehman Brothers investment bank; it…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The downfall of such huge companies is not just a failure of the financial system, but also a huge leadership failure. Excessive interest in personal financial goals as against the larger interest of the organization is one of the root cause of this meltdown. These days some managers are not that efficient and rely on reward and incentives. They believe that if they hire smart people, give huge incentives for personal results, the management of the firm would take care of itself. Under such circumstances, taking risks to achieve personal goals even if that puts others or…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ATSC Case

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did Goldman Sacks had enough capital to grow? Can it grow faster eough to retain its position?…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays