Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Bipartisan politics have been an integrated part of the American democrats from almost the start. A two party system gives the constituent a competitive way to elect representatives that align with people's own party affiliation. GerryMandering is a manipulation of the process to gain an unfair advantage for one party over an opposition party. Since the legislative branch is charged with creating equal districts, meaning of the same geological size and population The legal argument to be made in opposition to Gerrymandering is derived from the 14th Amendments which has the line “one person, one vote”. Districts can be won with ease when legislators redraw district lines in their own favor. Gerrymandering biggest weakness is that it affects democracy by letting politicians pick their voters. By going through the types of gerrymandering and it’s history you will see that is time to find another way to redistrict. The U.S Census, is tasked with counting how many people are living in the United States every ten years.() This
Most rulings stem from one decisive court case Davis V. Bander, that was heard in the late eighties. The court sustained that gerrymandering is a violation of voters rights and districts plans can be over. Unfortunately, the guidelines to do so were blurred. There is a strict burden of proving gerrymandering has affected an election outcome. One of the most successful ways in overturning Gerrymandering comes from The Voting Rights Act of 1975. In Section 2 of the Voters, Right Act places a provision that you cannot dilute the vote of minorities. The Voting Rights Act also implemented preclearance in the former Union States, giving the power to the national government to approve any legislation that affects voters. Recently, Texas and other states have found a reprieve from preclearance when a part of it was overturned in