Preview

German Aggression Was Responsible For The Outbreak Of A General European War In August 1914

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
German Aggression Was Responsible For The Outbreak Of A General European War In August 1914
German aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914. How far do you agree with this judgement?

For many Historians, the responsibility for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914 has been an area of great debate. Historians such as Gordon Corrigan in Source 1 support other historians such as Fischer who hold the view that it was primarily German aggression which caused the outbreak of war. Yet others, such as James Joll in Source 3 believe it was not purely Germany’s fault but the result of rising tensions among the entirety of Europe. L.F.C Turner, in Source 2, agrees to an extent with both of the views. However, on the face of it the view that German aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914 is the most compelling.
Firstly, Corrigan in Source 1 ultimately agrees with the assertion that German aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European war in August 1914. The view is evidenced as Corrigan states that Germany had in place a ‘plan for an aggressive war’ . . . as ‘early as 1906’. This can be seen as the Schlieffen Plan 1905 entailed potentially unprovoked attacks on both France and Belgium. The plan envisaged the German army using a six week period to quickly attack and defeat France, thus being able to focus all their forces on the East, preventing a war on two fights which they would be unable to win. Turner, in Source 2 agrees with Corrigan’s view as he says that the mobilization of France was a ‘reaction to the German war plan’ again referring to the Schlieffen Plan of 1905. Corrigan, in source 1 quotes Fisher who developed the thesis that Germany sought European dominance and ‘went to war to achieve these aims’ and therefore was to blame for the outbreak of a general European War. Evidence of this can be seen as from the 1890s, Germany followed a policy of Weltpolik, which entailed seeking colonial expansion and a more dominant position

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW1 DBQ

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page

    kindling Europe’s rivalry until the outbreak of World War I. Militarism refers to the “ …

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Centennial College The Making of the Modern World Corse Instructor: Dr. Jacob Meunier Group Number: 03 Name: Ng Sze Wing Date: 23th March 2015 Topic 2 By studying and discuss from the long- and short-term causes of the war, to understand how accurate was Article 231 on placing full blame for World War I on Germans.…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Causes of Wwii

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Documents1, 3, and 4 support the idea that one of the causes that led to World War II included Germany’s attempt of imperialism. Document 1, an excerpt from Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, explains some of Hitler’s ideas of forming a regime first in order to gain lands that had been taken away after German defeat in World War I. Document 1 is biased since it has been written by Hitler’s point of view who only wants to brainwash the German masses into supporting his ideas of “enhancing” Germany’s position as a global power by reconquering lost lands. Document 1 supports the idea that German imperialism encouraged the arousal of World War II since Germany began to conquer lands all the way to Poland therefore increasing its wealth other imperialistic nations such as Great Britain and France began to fear German further expansion to the whole European continent which would leave them as just another subordinate power rather than a global imperialist economy and caused them to act against the threatening Nazi regime. Document 3, is a newspaper article in which Hitler is presumed guilty of violating the Treaty of Versailles by creating an army, invading Rhineland, and promising to bring Germany to an equal level to that of great powers. Also, it explains how France told on Germany with the League of Nations for breaking the Treaty of Versailles yet there was no action against such. Document 3 supports this position by giving evidence of German imperialism through the conquering of states like Rhineland and foreign disagreement to such, in this case France who pressured the League of Nations to take actions since other imperial societies themselves were in danger of falling into German control…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never the less, we can also argue that the war in 1914 arose primarily as a result of German aggression because the war was planned in order to achieve “great power status”. It is source two that presents the theory of Fritz Fischer, in which he states that “Germany bore full responsibility for the war”. Fischer is enforcing the point that Germany was indeed aggressive and power hungry, this would suggest a suitable motive for them to go to war and therefore disagree with the opinion above. Further on, source two once again refers to the power hungry nature of Germany. “War was the only final mean by which the ruling elites could seek to maintain their power”, you could interpret this quote in two ways, you could say that this suggests the Germans were in fact trapped and they could only see one way to go on, through war. However I think that the source in fact is suggesting that they wanted to expand throughout Europe to gain a greater power status, to do this they had to go…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Berghahn, V.R. 1973. Germany and the Approach of War in 1914. New York: St. Martin 's Press.…

    • 9995 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wwi Dbq Essay Example

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the turn of the twentieth century, Europe seemed to enjoy a period of peace and progress. Yet below the surface, several forces were at work that would lead Europe into the “great war”. One of these forces was nationalism and it had an explosive effect in the Balkans. But, nationalism was only one of the many causes of World War I. Historians and eyewitnesses have described the causes of World War I and have tried to assess the responsibility for it. Two causes for World War I are militarism and nationalism. Militarism is when the empires use weapons and armies strength to show who is more powerful. Empires would build stronger weapons to fight other empires to show their strength. Nationalism is pride in one’s country or culture. All countries thought their best. These two causes influenced World War I.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sources 1, 2 and 3 all bring different arguments to the opinion that the decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of the First World War. Arguments such as the decisions made by Germany’s leaders caused outbreak, that diplomatic tension between the European countries caused outbreak and that pressure on Germany from inside the country caused outbreak are all presented in the sources and will be analysed in order to come to an evaluated conclusion.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914, war broke out in Europe between the most powerful countries. There were a number of reasons why World War One broke out and this essay will examine these reasons.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco­Prussian war of 1871 and the Crimean War of 1853, war began to become a…

    • 1815 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Causes of World War I

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another cause of WWI was the build up of militaries. From 1890-1914, every countries army had doubled, making each country stronger and more competitive. (C) Countries with weak armies couldn’t compete against England who had the strongest of them all. (D) The more money spent on each army; the more they are ready and willing to fight. (C) The constant build up of armies caused tension between countries and former weak armies wanted to take down stronger ones that had defeated them before.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of World War 1

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The war ended with an allied victory after the armistice in 1918. The war was followed by several treaties imposed on Germany and her allies, the most infamous of these being the Treaty of Versailles. The treaty of Versailles contained a very important war guilt clause which stated “The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” the importance of this clause was that it blamed the war solely on Germany. Thus we see how the official primary sources blamed German aggression as the main and only cause of the war.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays