Preview

Freedom To Bear Arms Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom To Bear Arms Research Paper
“The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.” -H. L. Mencken. Mencken implies that the average man would rather know that he is safe then to have freedom without safety. He implies that the average man would be happy living as his nation’s pet. So how can we be safe if we don’t have the freedom to voice our oppression? How can we protect ourselves when the ones giving us safety turn against us? Our freedom is what makes us safe, without it we cannot be truly safe. Our freedom of free speech and our right to bear arms are what protects us from being squashed by a tyrannical government. Our freedom protects and empowers us to fight for the safety of all people.
The main reason there has never been a long term attack
…show more content…

When the second amendment was made, giving us the right to bear arms, the founding fathers wanted the people to have equal arms to the army, they wanted us to be able to fight off our own military. This is because they never wanted America’s government to become tyrannical over it’s people. They wanted A fail-safe so that if the government tried to take away the rights of the people, the people could fight back if left no other option. Throughout history there have been nations whose people were not armed because they did not fear their own government, only to be trun on and wiped out. The most notorious even of this nature was when the Nazi party disarmed the Jewish population giving then no way of fighting back, before throwing them into death camps. Our right to bear arms form a barrier between us and the greed and oppressions of any government. “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.” ― Jeff Cooper, Art of the Rifle, Cooper Enforces that evil people or tyrants can and will be stopped if the militia of the people is well armed, but that the people of the militia must still have an eye for freedom. In times of peace this freedom sits dormant, but the knowledge of their existence keeps any tyrannical movements far away from America. This is why the first thing all tyrants do is disarm the civilians and why we should never give up our right to bear

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article details history of mass shootings that used assault weapons in America. The author places a definition on assault weapons as “a semiautomatic weapon with a detachable ammunition magazine and some type of advanced feature typically used in military-grade weapons.” The previous and now expired ban on certain assault weapons is also discussed in detail. The article suggests that proponents believe assault weapons are “guns of choice for mass shootings.” Opposing views on restrictions are also expressed in regards to mental health care as a solution to preventing tragedies.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s global environment has become more violent than just a decade ago. The majority of attacks has been on civilians in atmospheres where few, if any, of the victims are expected to be armed and able to defend themselves. However, hindsight reports from law enforcement personnel admit that if more private citizens were armed, the number of lethal crimes would most likely decrease. This is because criminals won’t know who, or how many, individuals are armed and ready to protect themselves and their loved ones.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open Carry Research Paper

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The new Open Carry law in Texas has created a lot of heat recently. This law allows previses owners of the concealed handgun license (CHL) to now freely display their weapon at the side of their hip or shoulder as long as it is inside a holster. In order to actually be able to openly carry a handgun in Texas you must: be at least twenty-one years of age, have a clean criminal and psychological record, and also complete the classroom training; while passing a shooting test. So imagine walking down your neighborhood or public park and seeing someone with a loaded handgun at the side of their hip. This may be concerning for some citizens because they do not know if this is someone whom will go buck-wild and open fire at anyone in their crosshair or they could be the only person whose lead encouragement will protect your very life. This law has complete support from the peculiar views of the second amendment, yet still has a copious amount of combined restrictions for the: gun owners, businesses, non-gun owners, and even the police. Texas has allowed its citizens to carry a concealed handgun for over twenty years; you have probably encountered a countless number of civilians with a concealed weapon and never realized it. So while open carry may be fairly new to being revitalized in Texas, it…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun control activists may ask, “What is the point of owning a gun?” The Constitution states in the Second Amendment that citizens should have the right to bear arms. This Amendment was particularly considered by the framers of the Constitution as a means of ensuring the citizenship the ability to confront oppressive governments. If history is any teacher, we have learned one irrefutable truth, repeated throughout the years: power corrupts. A citizen’s right to bear arms to enforce his right to be free from tyrannical oppression was deemed to be fundamental by the framers. This truth is as true today as the day it was drafted.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, especially after the Connecticut shooting, there is an argument over the right to bear arms. One portion of the argument focuses on whether or not people even have this right. As stated by Michael Sommers, the second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Sommers 42) When the second amendment was written and passed, there was no professional army, only a civilian…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Diener, E. and Crandall, R. (1979), An evaluation of the Jamaican anticrime program. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9:135–146.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The topic of concealed carry is something that a lot of people are talking about. Turn on the news, the radio, read the newspaper, surf the internet and the topic of conceal carry will be discussed. The reason it is so highly discussed is due to the effect that conceal carry will have on everyone regardless of race, age, and socio-economic background.…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the government have the right to regulate guns? According to former Chief Justice Warren E. Burger it does. In his article, published in the January 14, 1990, issue of Parade, titled The Right to Bear Arms, Warren feels that changes need to be made to the second amendment of our constitution in order to save peoples lives. He opens the essay with a statistic that states that many of the United State’s major centers have up to ten times the murder rate of all of Western Europe.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To better understand why the language of the 2nd amendment was used in such a way at to regarding arming individuals and maintaining militias, it’s necessary to understand the history of the people who wrote it. A foundation of political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. The right to bear arms was a potential check against tyranny. According to Sandra Alters in her book Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People, “without guns in the hands of the early patriots, the fledgling republic might have quickly turned tyrannical, disarmed the people at…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control, has recently become a topic of discussion. After the recent shootings in Florida, California and Connecticut, Gun control activists have been pushing to change the laws and control what type of weapon can be bought. But many people view guns as a tool that helps in times of crisis when help may be not willing to come, or not in range. Instead of placing more restrictions on guns and their owners, we should uphold the current laws, with the ability to protect ourselves and other Americans through the usage of firearms.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control Debate

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is safe to say that American society has changes since then. You can live today without the realistic fear that you are in danger and need a gun to protect you. The United States has the strongest and most technologically advanced army in the world. They will certainly be able to protect their citizens from any other threatening nations. Slavery was repealed a long time ago. There is no one that you need to control or intimidate with a weapon. Hopefully America will not have to go to war over the gun control debate. Supporters of the second amendment and its traditions continue to say it is necessary because we need to defend ourselves from the government. If the government becomes tyrannical it is the people’s duty to take it back. This was a very relevant cause when America was trying to run from King George’s overpowering governance. The founding fathers wanted to ensure their government does not take the form of the one they just escaped from. Today Americans do not need to fear the tyrannical rule of kings. In fact America has a government on the complete opposite side of the political spectrum. Besides even if you were to attempt to take back the government you would have no success. Your Smithson Weston does not exactly help you when fighting drones. The founding fathers certainly did not anticipate the types of weaponry accessible today. American society has evolved since the eighteenth century and it is time their gun laws reflected…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine waking up in the middle of the night to a complete stranger who is in your house, threatening to harm you, and your family, and you cannot do anything about it. Imagine, not being able to go target shooting or hunting, because there are laws passed to prevent you from owning a firearm. The truth is, more and more people in this country are trying to restrict law-abiding people from owning firearms due to the overwhelming rise in gun related crimes. As law abiding citizens, the constitution gives us the right to bear arms. Whether it is for recreation or protection, restrictions should not apply to those who obey the law. We should not be forced into certain gun regulations, due to the criminals who violate the law. The 2nd amendment of the constitution of the United States gives us the right to bear arms. In this essay it will be explaining why we shouldn’t change the amendment for these three reasons; law enforcement need to bear arms, hunters need to bear arms and also law abiding citizens need to bear arms.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Allowing more people to have the right to carry a concealed weapon will decrease crimes. By having a variety of people being able to carry a concealed weapons permit meaning women/men, police officers, security guards. This includes having police officers in public schools to make the children safer. The right to bear arms decreases crimes, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Personnel who open carry or concealed carry are less likely to be assaulted or robbed. The criminals are the only ones for gun control for their own protection. That way they can increase the robbery percentage. Protecting the 2nd amendment rights for all individuals to bear arms benefits Americans by decreasing violence, rape, and…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being free means being able to do what you desire without rules holding you back. The Civil Rights Movement, the Holocaust, and the attack on Paris prove that being secure is worth more than being unrestricted because if the are no rules, there is no protection. Wouldn’t you rather be safe than sorry.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to bear arms pertains to the American citizen, and a well-educated and armed public will create a safer society. With this in mind the right we as Americans should stand by and protect.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays