Preview

Freedom of Speech at College

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech at College
Free Speech on College Campuses Universities are considering adopting speech codes that would put a ban on offensive, demeaning, and provoking speech. The developments of these speech codes are not necessary. Sheltering students from speech that might offend them is patronizing to say the least. Do college officials really believe the students are too weak to live with the Bill of Rights? The fact of the matter is that speech codes on college campuses are threatening students’ freedom of speech and the free exchange of ideas and therefore have no place in higher education. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Cornell.edu). Michael Cooper, of the New York Times says, although the amendment is only a mere forty-five words, the Founding Fathers laid out what the fundamental rights that Americans are entitled to and understood that the great danger of democracy was the tyranny of the majority (8). Freedom of speech is essential, without it there is no freedom.
Harvey A. Silverglate, a member of the Board of Directors of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, stated, there has been an ongoing argument about the difference between speech and conduct. To some, “The amendment would seem to protect speech only—and not the various forms of conduct that can communicate a message” (23). States and government have been trying to make laws that the Bill of Rights covers speech only and not conduct, but the Supreme Court rules that “the amendment protects not just speech but ‘communication’” (Silverglate 23).
According to the article “Protecting the Free Exchange of Ideas in Higher Education”, all across



Cited: ACLU.org. “Hate Speech on Campus”. Web. 1994. 29 March 2010. Bok, Derek Clemmitt, Marcia. "Academic Freedom." CQ Researcher 15.35 (2005): 833-856. CQ Researcher. Web. 29 Mar. 2010. Cooper, Michael. "Can Free Speech Go Too Far?" New York Times Upfront 142.12 (2010): 8. Academic Search Elite. Web. 29 Mar. 2010. Dershowitz, Alan M. “Testing Speech Codes.” Everything’s an Argument. Lunsford, Andrea A., and Ruszkiewicz, John J., Bedford/St. Martin’s: Boston, 2007. 166-167. Print. Jost, Kenneth. "Hate Crimes." CQ Researcher 3.1 (1993): 1-24. CQ Researcher. Web. 7 Apr. 2010. ---. "Student Rights." CQ Researcher 19.21 (2009): 501-524. CQ Researcher. Web. 29 Mar. 2010. Larner, Jesse. "Hate Crime/Thought Crime." Dissent 57.2 (2010): 74-79. Academic Search Elite. Web. 30 Mar. 2010. Silverglate Harvey, et al. Fire’s Guide to Free Speech on Campus. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Philadelphia: 2005. Thefire.org. Web. 29 Mar. 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jon Katz, an American journalist and author, also argued: “Institutions that are supposed to be breeding grounds for original and innovative thought have embraced the forced re-ordering of moral conscience” (Katz). However, speech codes do not stifle freedom of speech. It merely adds to the exclusions of the first amendment in order to create a safe learning environment and equal opportunities for all. Speech codes, in no way, limit learning, in fact, they enhance learning…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Silvergate notes that limiting free speech would fall to the responsibility of college administrators who will undoubtedly over censor due to the broad harassment regulations the proposed bill contains. He supports this point by adding that the Individual Rights Foundation, FIRE already claims harassment as “the most abused tool to limit free speech.”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reviewing the required material for this module, there are numerous amount of interesting information about the topic of hate crimes. When viewing the lecture, hate crimes is like a reminder of the Micro level theory of Resource theory. Resource theory, the same as hate crimes brings to mind of power. Power, where a person displays their control over another person, by commanding them to do what is said and done. What also caught my attention were the charts that were in the written lectures. When viewing them, I was wondering why was there a high number of Hate Crime Incidents, and a high number of cases for Religious hate crime in the year 2001. It came to me after realizing that the reasons for the high numbers of incidents and cases…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kyle Shockey is a Resource Description Specialist at the American University. His article discusses academic freedom and its relationship to the LIS Curriculum. He begins by discussing Professor Steven Salatia losing his tenured position at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign after the professor used Twitter to criticize the Israel Defense Force during the summer of 2014. Given that one of the ALA’s core values is academic freedom, Shockey argues that the ALA and ALA-accredited schools and institutions should’ve done more to defend Professor Salatia.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racist speech

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Charles R. Lawrence III, a professor of law at Stanford University, wrote the article “On Racist Speech” against the growing incidence of racial violence, especially in University campuses in the U.S. A college campus has the status of a “home” for the students residing therein, and as such any racist aggression or violence in general and racist speech in particular have the potential to disturb the law, order, and harmony in the social environment, apart from causing injury to the victims of such racial behavior. This paper attempts to analyze the reasons and arguments mooted by Lawrence to demand that racist speech must be regulated, more so in a college campus environment. It also examines how such regulation will impinge upon, or impact, the rights assured under the First Amendment.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Jacobs, J. B. & Potter, K. A. (1997). Hate Crimes: A Critical Perspective. 22 Crime & Just. 1. Retrieved from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Racism and Anti-Semitism

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hate Crime. FBI. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/resources/hate-crime-2010-about-hate-crime (adapted from the sixth edition of the APA Publication Manual, © 2010)…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Herek, Gregory M. "Selected Publications About Hate Crimes." UC Davis, Psychology. Web. 07 Dec. 2010. <http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/hate_bib.html>.…

    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Crimes

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Violence motivated by a bias against victims ' characteristics which include race, religion, ethnic background, national origin, gender, or sexual orientation, represents a serious threat to all communities. Experts estimate that a bias-related crime is committed every 14 minutes. Criminal justice officials and state policy makers need to realize that it is key to make or adjust hate crime legislation. This has been a heated debate for centuries. I think more hate crime legislation is key to solving the ever-growing problem of hate crimes.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raul, R. (2010, January 22). Justice gets tough on hate crimes . Retrieved October 20, 2010, from EbscoHost: www.ebscohost.com…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is freedom of speech? It means different things for different people. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution codifies the freedom of speech as a constitutional right. The Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791. The Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (Mount, 2010). Freedom of speech is much more than words written on a piece of paper long time ago. Humankind have fought and died for it. As consequence, the battle is still in continuance worldwide. This right should be exercised and used, due to a whole range of reasons.…

    • 2545 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Mill, John Stuart. 1869. On Liberty of Thought and Discussion. In On Liberty (chapter II).…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays