Preview

Feminism vs Marxism Political Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feminism vs Marxism Political Theory
INTRODUCTION:
The foreign battles being fought all around the world are invisible to the eyes of many.
The Author of this article is a philanthropist who loves democracy and the spread of globalization in the form of international aid organizations. The Author is concerned with the expansion, transformation and continuation of open democratic societies, in which the sovereignty resides within the people, not through the tyrant as us to be the case.

IRA: 1 "How a twist on an old Idea can protect the world 's most vulnerable populations" (Soros). State sovereignty came into effect after the Treaty of Westphalia 1648, now with a twist on the idea of sovereignty, the people come to power. The author cries for the recognition and importance of open societies, and their ability to accept foreign aid.

I. Question One: What is the main argument?

That the idea of sovereignty has mutated, from the ability of the state to rule itself without interference from other nations, to citizens having the ability to rule themselves, and to choose when it 's in their best interest to relinquish their rights to a higher authority or government. Sovereignty has shifted from the State power to the power of the people. That foreign aid doesn 't affect the sovereignty of a state unless forcefully done so in the name of cries for help from disenfranchised individuals. That we need to spread democracy and help open the doors for third world nation states to accept foreign aid.

II. Question Two: What are the basic facts used by the author in support of the argument?

The fall of the Soviet Union shows how there has been a shift in sovereignty from the state dominating the people, to the people ruling or delegating power to the state. "The European union pressured the Baltic states to guarantee minorities legal rights and protections" (Soros 21). This form of protection / power of the people, exemplifies a drastic change from state held sovereignty to a common



Cited: Democratic socialist, "a need for democratic socialism in America." Democratic Socialist of America. 10 September 2005. < http://www.dsausa.org/ds a.html > Global Policy Forum, "State sovereignty and the global economy." 10 September 2005. Global Policy Forum, "This marks the death of Deterrence (October 9, 2002)." Preemption. 10 September 2005. Global Policy Forum, "The US and UN on International Laws." 10 September 2005. Soros, George. "The people 's Sovereignty." Article 4. Annual Editions, World Politics 05/06 Ed. Twenty Sixth. Pp 20-21. Purkitt: McGraw-Hill/Duskin 2005.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Koch, Adrienne. Power, Morals, and the Founding Fathers: Essays in the Interpretation of the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question A: What is the claim? Is it explicitly stated, or did you have to infer it?…

    • 536 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.…

    • 2675 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ends European global mastery 3. Interwar period a. Economic crisis – started by US b. Dictatorial regimes – Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia 1. Totalitarian states wave of the future? 4. Communism as alternative to capitalism 5.…

    • 17642 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hanley, Charles J. "Abolishing Nukes: Flicker of Hope to Global Cause." Msnbc.com. The Associated Press, 2010. Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    **You will use these paragraphs to prove your thesis statement by making sub-arguments and providing examples from the book to illustrate each.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. McWhorter says in paragraph #6 that he intends to build an argument. What specifically is his argument? State in your own words.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tma 07 - Ema

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The state is seen as a set of organisations and practices that aims to prevent social chaos and make social order within a defined territory. It refers to the shared ideas and expectations regarding the ordering of social life and establishes who might legitimately claim to exercise authority over many aspects of society from churches to parents. Some people see the state as ‘the government’, whereas others may see it as different institutions such as their school or hospital. However, the state is less solid and more complex than this. In order for the state to govern its territory it needs to have legitimate authority, which means it needs the consent of those being governed. The government demands the right to represent or rule some areas of society’s lives and in many cases; social scientists are able to see the difference between what the government is and what state is. In order to examine and assess the view that the legitimacy of state is always contested, this essay will be drawing on evidence from different social scientists and researchers in order to argue both sides of this claim.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state is a self-governing body that is independent, has a permanent population as well as a defined territory and is self-supporting. It acquires the power to create and modify legislation. Therefore a state has sovereignty over its territory; this indicates that is has considerable economical, political, social and legal power. The state however also has an obligation to address the needs of the individuals of the state as well as the community, yet; on the other hand legislation is introduced to help limit the power of the state. When the needs of the individual come in difference with the varying needs of the sate, conflict arises; thereby it is required for the needs of the individual and the state to be in balance. Citizens of a sovereign state are able to challenge state power in two ways: by informal means and formal means.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    8. Deudney, Daniel & Meiser, Jeffrey. “American Exceptionalism”. Chapter 2. U.S. Foreign Policy. 2008. Pg. 39.…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 20th century, many nations gained independence from colonial rule, mainly due to the idea of Nationalism growing throughout the world. However, after gaining independence, the common idea that the people had held: ‘to be free from the oppressors’, became obsolete, and they found that there simply wasn’t a strong enough ideology to mollify everybody.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the year 1990 to 1995 there was an attempt to strike this much needed balance between sovereignty and national minority rights by the Organization for Security in Europe and the Council for Europe. These two organizations saw the need to have national minorities given a say in the running of the affairs of the sate and they also sought to align emerging trends towards minority rights in Europe. Suffice it to say, they were faced with two options ideally, resort to more direct means of economic or military enforcement or bring about compliance with national minority rights and to them, the former seemed the most logical option . Sending peace keeping troops or imposing economic embargoes was seen as a very drastic option where there was visibly gross violations of human rights and eruptions of conflicts in states, instead there was a clear aim to prevent conflicts from reaching the point where these drastic measures would be resorted to. Their goal can be said to have been the encouragement of democratization and the respect for human and national minority rights within their area of operation.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humanitarian intervention had better be avoided because it is difficult for foreigners to enforce human rights”. Liberals argue that states are recognized by the knowledgeable consent of their citizens argued that fairness could only be established by a local struggle for liberty. Human rights cannot take root if they are carrying out or enforced by outsiders.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Progressive Era

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the reformers of this movement consisted of a diverse group of individuals-- journalists, politicians, middle class, and men and women --- the thing that united them was their goal of protecting the people, solve urbanization and industrialization problems, improve social welfare, and of course promoting the ideal of democracy. These everlasting effects are shown even until present day in two distinct ways. The most important effect is the difference between prior existing and modern definitions of democracy. Direct democracy is a government run on people’s say and in which people decide policy initiatives directly. However, the definition has changed over the years and the new western democratic definition is a government which incorporates the people’s ideas as well as elected officials which is slightly different than the previous example. Because of this continuous push of democracy, America’s [policeman] role in the world is relevant in this paper. The spread of western democracy’s (although a bit different) ideals. A key example is the 2016 Presidential Election between Republican Donald Trump and Democratic Hillary Clinton. Numerous times in their discussions and debates, the topic of democracy and whether its ideals are protected was common during the time period of the election. In…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the context of authority, Murphy argues that international law arises from a horizontal structure, in which all 193 nation states have supreme authority in self-governing their statehood. However, Teitel disagrees with Murphy’s viewpoint because she argues that sovereignty fails to understand the challenges of security in terms of protection and preservation of the people. Her argument is based on a framework of humanitarian law where sovereign states are shifting their relations between economic development and the promotion of human rights. Therefore, it is imperative to argue that the legality of international law is changing due to the expansion of humanitarian law because it is an attempt to bridge the gap between existing legal forms.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays