Preview

Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Legal System in the Settlement of Disputes Involving World Order.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Legal System in the Settlement of Disputes Involving World Order.
“World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.

Each country has its own perspective on world order and not all meets eye to eye. But it can be argued that world order is a necessity in today’s society. There are many conflicts between majorities and minorities or nation against nation that can take many forms such as guerilla, military and nuclear warfare. An example of a military conflict was the Gulf war between Iraq and the UN lead forces concerning the occupation of Kuwait. But not all conflicts fit into the category of direct confrontation; some arise when a group ignores the needs of another or exploits them. For example after a long civil war in 1996 when the Taliban took control of Afghanistan. Many measures severely restricted women’s rights and alienated other Afghans. Due to an imbalance of economic power further conflicts can arise such as when a third world country cannot compete with developed nations because of the lack of capital they possess.

When a dominant group expands its power by taking over territory and increasing its population and its resources, it is called expansion, which affects



Bibliography: http://www.icc-cpi.int/about.htlm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order http://www.flashpoints.info/FlashPoints_home.html http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issues/warfare.htm The Daily Telegraph National Geographic Textbook

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Although all wars are conflicts, not all conflicts are wars. Conflicts don’t always have the involvement of armed hostiles, battles or even the involvement of the military. Conflicts can range from anything as little as an argument between politicians, all the up to an official war. Many people believe since World War 2 there have been less conflicts; however there has simply been less conflicts between nations and more within nations. One of the biggest reasons for this is that 90% of countries are made up of different ethnic groups and cultural groups. Some people do not like different types of people in their country which leads to conflict.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The origin of today’s political system dates back to 1648 at the creation of the Peace of Westphalia. After years of living under feudal systems, a treaty was formed that granted sovereignty to nation-states, and thus, organized a political anarchic system that still exists today. Due to the system’s lack of a World Order, nation-states must make decisions that will protect their sovereignty within the anarchy, which therefore, contributes to the extremely competitive nature of world politics.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    International decision making enables superpowers to make key decisions about the world economy, conflicts or environmental issues. This power is mainly held in the hands of inter-governmental organisations (IGO’s) some IGOs involve all nations, such as the U.N., whereas others are more exclusive such as the G8, or regional such as NATO. These IGO’s are important for superpowers to maintain their status as it allows them to focus global policy and decision making in their own interest. For example most IGO’s operate a veto voting system, where if a certain country with veto does not agree to the policy then the vote is not carried out. Many superpowers use this to their advantage, for example the EU and the USA tend to vote with each other, giving them the opportunity to block policies they do not agree with, therefore allowing them to force their own policies. This makes it difficult for smaller nations with less power to have a role in international decision making.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent history, an international community has proved to be anything but international, nor a community. Internationalism is the prime cause of conflict, as it has caused localized issues to be expanded into worldwide wars, therefore it should only be pursued to the extent of regional communication. Key examples are both world wars, as well as current day conflicts and human rights infringements in Middle Eastern countries. World War 1 was not initially a worldwide war, but a conflict between two neighbouring countries with numerous allies. By extension, World War 2 was started due to failures of internationalism at the end of the first world war, which then resulted in one of, if not the, largest genocide in recent history. Furthermore,…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Basically she points out many inconsistencies and contradictions of UN charters and resolutions on international rule of law and sovereignty, claiming that despite the fact UN recognizes all states as equal formally, still Security Council grants veto power to only five most powerful states. Also the author claims UN charters are implicit and ambiguous, or even too broad making it possible for some states to interpret these internationally accepted laws and concepts in their own interest so that to avoid conflict and criticism. She also indicates the challenge for individuals to get access to law because of the lack of mechanism, however individuals can prove theirs right through a very few means within the international system. The author uses very important and clear quotes of UN charters and descriptions regarding rule of law and sovereignty, however she fails to mention that the U.S. also should comply with international rule of…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the international realm, states will inevitably seek a balance of power. When a number of weaker states are threatened by a coalition of stronger states, they join forces, establish a formal alliance, and seek to persevere their own independence by checking the power of the opposing side. Balance of power seeks to ensure the equilibrium of power in which case no one state is in a position to dominate all the others. The aims of the Balance of Power Theory is to preserve the independence and survival of individual nation-states, preserve the state system, and prevent any one state from dominating the system. The means to achieve this is through vigilance, alliance, reciprocal communication, intervention, and…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the international system of anarchy and complexity, the means of illustrating the key aspect of international society that influences the actions of states, and the motives behind their actions is a complicated process. According to some scholars, the norms of society, both internal and external to the domestic setting, and the conventional perceptions these provide surrounding key issues across the globe, are of upmost importance and hold the most influence upon states. These scholars suggest that states act based on ethical and morally concerned relations, as to correspond with the norms held by the members of their domestic population and the population of the globe. These ideas surrounding social norms however can be proved as somewhat…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Order

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each country has its own perspective on world order and not all meets eye to eye. But it can be essentially argued that world order is a necessity in today’s society. There are many conflicts between majorities and minorities or nation against nation that can take many forms such as guerilla,…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Order Legal Studies

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    World order is fundamentally just world peace. A world full of peace would mean that each individual would have a fair go at life and have a potential to have success. Throughout history, war and conflict have denied the world of its peace between nations. The rise in terrorism around the world, the inequality between the rich and the poor within and between nations, the push for globalisation and free trade, and the growing awareness of human rights globally have all stimulated the need for world order.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Justice Issues

    • 4076 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Equity and social justice issues have become a global challenge that the world over is confronted with. It has got to a point that even international efforts and systems put in place have become overwhelmed with theories than realities. The United Nations which has purposely been formed to address human rights and social justice issues has in itself been bedeviled with gross inequalities and injustices. Attempt is made to show case some pitfalls on ethical and social justice issues within the UN systems and the agencies that all work to meeting its mandate of creating a peaceful world.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The State-Centric Approach

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    International Organizations are formal institutional structures transcending national boundaries that are created by multilateral agreement among nation-states. Their purpose is to foster international cooperation in areas such as security, law, economic and social matters and diplomacy. The world system has many factors that effect what happens in world Politics. One major explanation of this is the State-Centric approach where state-actors and the world system work together. This makes it so that everyone is accountable for their actions since all of the state-actors are on a world stage. Many events that happen in the world can also have other factors that can directly or indirectly be influenced by Non Governmental organizations.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Norms in Security

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The belief that all norms are created by the powerful can be challenged. As international norms have come to be shaped by a number of factors such as newer democracies, pressure groups, international and humanitarian organizations. Humanitarian values, global security, moral ethical behaviour by powerful states are some of the values that have given direction to and reflect international norms as illustrated by the following quote. " The case of nuclear taboo is important theoretically because it challenges conventional views that international norms, especially in the security area, are created mainly by and for the powerful," (Tannenwald, 2005, 7).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    An international order means how the world exist, work and co-related to each other, which could explain in different aspects included political, military, economic and diplomatic. In the following paragraphs, how Paris Peace Settlements during 1919-23 established a new international order would be explained.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CLASS NOTES By Leslie A. Beck COMPARATIVE LAW CIVIL LAW VS. COMMON LAW AREAS OF COMPARISON Differences that you should be aware of Property Law Sources of law and method of judicial reasoning Property Law Civil Law You are either the absolute owner, or you are not. 3 components of absolute ownership usus (latin term) i.e. use Right of use fructus ie. enjoyment of revenues Right to enjoy revenues abusus ie disposal Right to dispose of that thing dismemberment This does not mean that the absolute owner cannot give away certain rights of the property, as long as the rights transfer back to the owner E.g. usifruct farmer has a large piece of land and son wants to get married and have family. Farmer is not willing to divide up the farm, but offers him a part of the farm where he lets him build a house and farm on it, but after 20/30/40 years the land goes back to the father Lease if you lease an apartment from the owner of a building, or a piece of land to farm on, etc you get the right to use it in consideration of rent. In this sense, the owner is giving away one right (the right to use the property) as long as at the end they get the right of use back. Common Law Theory no absolute ownership of land King gives a portion of the country to the Earls. In common law, there is a difference between ownership and possession. The Earls possess it, they are holding the land for him. The Earls will provide him every year with something in return (e.g. bushels of corn, men for war, etc). Earl gives a portion of that land to the Dukes, and asks that they hold it for them, in exchange for bushels, men etc. Dukes to the Lords, all the way to the peasant/farmer. When the farmer died, he was not able to give it to his children it would go to the lord, etc up the chain and that person would redelegate it. Known as the feudal system. Leasehold is when you hold it for a limited period of time. A freehold is where you hold the land forever, and you can sell the land, leave the land…

    • 2430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems that it is the world’s superpowers who play an important role in making sure that war is averted. By not abusing their strength, and respecting the rights of minor countries to self-determination many conflicts could be avoided. They should also stay out of the internal affairs of other countries. Disagreeing with the politics of another country does not give the superpowers the right to invade it. It is also their responsibility to halt the arms race by setting the example. For instance, should they themselves dismantle their existing missile systems and put a stop to the testing of nuclear weapons then other countries would be forced to follow suit.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays