Preview

Euthanasia vs. Palliative Sedation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia vs. Palliative Sedation
Euthanasia vs. Palliative Sedation
Mary McCann
Keiser University
Research for Evidence Based Practice & outcome management
Nurs 680
Dr. Jenkins
April 28, 2013

Euthanasia vs. Palliative Sedation
In this paper the author will discuss the difference between euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, and palliative sedation. The author will discuss the legal and ethical side of palliative sedation.
Palliative sedation is where they use education to induce or decrease awareness of one 's intractable suffering at the end of life (Olsen, Swetz, & Mueller, 2010, p. 949). They use this type of sedation when other most common forms of pain control does not relieve the pain the patient is feeling. Not only is it used to treat pain but it is also used to treat delirium, pain, dyspnea, nausea or other physical symptoms (Olsen et al., 2010, p. 950). In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina reviewers concluded that physicians choice of benzodiazepines instead of barbiturates indicated a goal of palliative rather than euthanasia, stating that barbiturates were more deadly. Some institutions used ketamine or propoful in patients condition is refractory to opioids and midazolam. Opiates should not be used for primary purpose of sedation, but rather should be continued adjunctively during palliative sedation for analgesic purpose to prevent opiate withdrawal (Olsen et al., 2010, p. 950). Usually palliative sedation is given in a form of continuous drip but there has been times when palliative sedation has been given intermittently. Palliative sedation should be given in the areas of general care or hospice settings, ICU settings can be too hectic and uncomfortable for families. Cardiac monitoring is no good in achieving the goals of palliative sedation (Olsen et al., 2010, p. 951). Before palliative care is given written consent should be obtained by the patient or the patients family.
In the state f Arizona the Arizona State Board of Nursing has develop an advisory



References: Berghs, M., Dierckx, B., & Gastmans, C. (2013). The complexity of nurses’ attitudes toward euthanasia: a review of the literature. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31. Retrieved from www.jmedethics.com Brewer, J. K., & Ridenour, J. (2010). Advisory Opinion Palliative Sedation AT END OF LIFE. Retrieved from Http://www.azbn.gov Lawson, M. (2011). Palliative Sedation. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 15 (6)(15). Nevidjon, B. M., & Mayer, D. K. (2012). Death is Not an Option, How You Die Is. Oncology Nursing, 30 (3), 148-152. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com Olsen, M., Swetz, K., & Mueller, P. (2010). Ethical Decision Making with End-of-Life Care: Palliative Sedation and Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatments. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 85 (10), 949-954.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Group Ethics Paper FINALLY

    • 1654 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pain control is one of the most important goals of end-of-life care and the use of opioids for this purpose is extremely common. It is the nurse’s duty to alleviate pain, and according to Brennan et al. (2007), “The American Medical Association states that physicians have an obligation to relieve pain and suffering, and the American Nurses Association's position is that nursing encompasses […] the alleviation of suffering […]”.If a nurse does not treat pain, it is poor practice that can result in many confrontational effects, such as the patient may refuse care and stop interacting with caregivers. It is the ethical duty of nurses to practice beneficence towards patients and to relieve their pain, and by the principles of nonmaleficence…

    • 1654 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pain and suffering is unique to each individual. Even with excellent care, symptom management sometimes falls short in alleviating the suffering at the end of life. Only the individual can determine if he or she is able or willing to endure that suffering. In order to provide full autonomy and spectrum of choice for patients, physician-assisted suicide that is legal with standards of care to protect all parties should be in place.…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Majority of people all around the world want to have a choice before a death and they are in favor of legalization of euthanasia and physical-assisted suicide.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Williams, Mary E. "Should Physicians Be Permitted to Hasten the Deaths of Terminally Ill Patients." Terminal Illness: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, 2001. 111-25. Print.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who has the right to decide when to end life sustaining measures? Is it the individual, the health care provider, or the government? This has been an ongoing debate for many decades in the healthcare field. Advanced directives were suppose to be the simple solution to this dilemma. However, this simple solution has become very complicated and has evolved over the years. According to Watson et al. (2010) end-of-life care highlights the following issues: competency, persistent vegetative state, living wills, best interest standards. Oftentimes people, including nurses have a difficult time speaking about end-of-life care. Advanced directives should be a legal document that allows a person to decide their wishes about…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were told you had a terminally ill disease and only had one more year to live, filled with suffering, what would you chose to do? This question leads us to the sensitive and controversial topic of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia can simply be defined as physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients. This issue has stirred debates that have drawn attention to the complex issues concerning the ethical implications of end-of-life care. Supporters of euthanasia argue that they seek only to prevent unnecessary suffering while the critics maintain that it is unethical to end an individual’s life. However, many public opinions have reported that over 80% of the general population support amendments in the law to…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician Assisted Death

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Many of us have felt the pain of watching a loved one’s life slowly diminish in a hospital bed. Today, modern medicine and doctors can only go so far to care for terminally ill patients. Even with the knowledge of this country’s best medicine and most extraordinary doctors, many of the terminally ill suffer persistently; they become unhappy, and some are not able to fend for themselves in ways healthy individuals find to be easy and are able to do. The simple every day actions begin to be tremendous struggles such as eating, moving, and even communicating. In extreme cases, terminally ill patients may no longer find the will or strength to move forward. Physician-assisted death can be constructed to have reasonable laws, which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life, easing the patients suffering when nearing the end of their life. Physician-assisted death is ethical and is a compassionate response to unbearable suffering. Physicians should be required by law to help terminally ill patients, with no hope, which have a strong desire to end their lives.…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Physician-assisted suicide is the act of a physician prescribing a drug to a patient, who then is able to take on his or her own without the assistance of a medical provider or other person” (Gunderson, 2000). The drug generally results in unconsciousness within five minutes and death within thirty minutes. This is similar to the way they do euthanasia in pets with the first drug and then the second to shut everything down until it stops. This is the best pain free with no suffering way.…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Opponents, on the other hand, may argue that there is the potential that an error with the drug used might not provide a quick death, leading to further suffering. However, for the majority of Oregonian patients administered a lethal dose whose time after ingesting the drug until death was known died within half an hour, and time till death ranged from eleven minutes to one hour (Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act-2014). Moreover, during the time since Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act was passed in 1997 until 2014, only six patients of 859 patients total who participated in the program regained consciousness after consuming the prescribed dose of the drug (Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act-2014). Similarly, out of the 40 individuals who received a lethal prescription of secobarbital through Washington’s Death With Dignity Program “between March 5, 2009, and December 31, 2011”, all of them died (Loggers et al. 2013). Thus, in the overwhelming majority of cases, the lethal dose of the drug was highly effective in ensuring the desired death, and so these concerns, while legitimate, are largely…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may think that with the advanced care available today, they will not suffer. They are very wrong. “The people from palliative care reassured him that he would not suffer. He did suffer. Although he was in one of the best palliative care facilities in Melbourne, dying was a slow, cruel process,” (Edelman, 2017, p. 1). And, while palliative care, “‘Can help make it a little bit better,’” people are, “‘Still going to suffer from loss of strength, loss of ability to eat or swallow, breathe properly. These are things that palliative care is going to hopefully make it a little easier to face but they’re not going to take it away,’” (Tompson, 2014, p. 4). Most in these states are cancer sufferers, who are not doing very well and have little time left. In some of the worst cases, the cancer will progress and several rounds of treatment will not stop this. A scenario like this left one woman in a state where, “The cancer in her brain was progressing despite several rounds of treatment. At 68, she spent most of her day asleep and needed an aide to help with basic tasks,” (Span, 2017, p. 1). At the end, despite treatments and medication not working, most are still forced to live with morphine thrumming through their veins and a tube down their throat. One man who lost his mother stated that,“‘ There was clearly no possible hope of reprieve, yet she was still forced to linger...The whole thing just felt…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Person's Right to Die

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the majority of cases, people die in hospitals where physicians and nurses make heroic efforts to keep patients alive until there is no reasonable chance for their recovery. Unfortunately, in the course of those valiant efforts, pain, suffering, and the wishes of patients and their families are often overlooked as physicians and staff struggle with medical, moral, legal, and economic matters. In most cases, medical professionals have significant discretion in deciding when additional efforts to sustain life are futile, and a patient should be allowed to die.…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people do not like to talk or even think about death; much less the topic of ending one’s own life. For some, death is a desired alternative to living on in agony. Euthanasia has been a topic of debate since antiquity, and both sides stand firm on their beliefs. The innate right to choose death is illegal in most countries. I believe in people’s freedom to do what they please with their own bodies. The basic right of liberty is what America was founded on. Governments have over stepped their boundaries. Euthanasia should be made a legal option.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest controversies of this decade is euthanasia. Euthanasia is “inducing the painless death of a person for reasons assumed to be merciful?(Henrickson and Martin 24). There are four types of euthanasia voluntary and direct, voluntary but indirect, direct but involuntary, and indirect and involuntary. Voluntary and direct euthanasia is “chosen and carried out by the patient.? Voluntary but indirect euthanasia is chosen in advance. Direct but involuntary euthanasia is done for the patient without his or her request. Indirect and involuntary euthanasia occurs when a hospital decides that it is time to remove life support (Fletcher 42-3).…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Synopsis on Euthanasia

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia is a complex and complicated issue. There are many arguments for and against, and the debate is highly relevant as we often have to deal with it. Is it okay to take another person's life, although the person requested to be killed? Who is responsible, the doctor or the patient? What is the difference between euthanasia and murder? These are just a few questions you might have to deal with. In most cases of euthanasia, the person who is killed made a request to be killed, but in some cases the person wasn’t able to make such a request. Due of the massive debate and relevance I chose this subject.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics