Ebola In West Africa

With the Ebola outbreak in late 2014, I started to think about ways to prevent sickness and diseases. I have seen many claims of natural treatments for everything from the common flu to cancer and even HIV, but are any of them real? An article posted on NaturalNews states that shipments of nonosilver were used in the treatment of Ebola in West Africa, but what is nonosilver? A declassified document from the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) (declassified in 2009) shown that antimicrobial silver solutions have proven effective at 10 PPM in fighting Ebola and other forms of hemorrhagic fever.

If this is so good, why isn’t it used more? And if it was a cure, or at the very least, slowed the spread of Ebola, why isn’t it used on Ebola patients?
Used topically, colloidal silver can accelerate healing, reducing scar tissue and infection. Colloidal silver cannot interact with other forms of medicine being taken. Silver has been used for medicinal properties for thousands of years, Hippocrates, also known as “the father of medicine,” used silver in treating wounds, In ancient Greece and Rome, silver was used for infections and to prevent food from spoilage. It was not until the late 1930s that silver was popularized in antibiotic treatment in the United States. There have been many enhancements in silver solutions, making them more safe and effective.

What does the experts have to say about colloidal silver:

“Silver is one of the most universal antibiotic substances. When administered in the colloidal form, it is for all practical purposes non-toxic. Silver has been proven to be effective against hundreds of infectious conditions. It has tremendous anti-microbial power; the history of safe and successful colloidal silver use is extensive, and the number of current health professionals and individuals that successfully utilize colloidal silver to reduce the length and severity of infectious disorders is growing exponentially.” ---Zane Baranowski, CN

“To primitive life forms…silver is as toxic as the most powerful chemical disinfectants and this, coupled with its relative harmlessness to animate life (i.e.
This happened about a century ago, when what we call, “modern medicine” was born. The empirical doctors were treating diseases with natural herbs curing their patients by treating the cause of the disease, and not treating the symptoms. In the 1800s, a patient could choose to be treated by an allopathic doctor or the more natural healer, called a homeopath. The two groups had a large debate. The allopathic doctors and their medical approach to medicine were to aggressively drive the disease and illness from the patient’s body. The allopathic used and promoted the sale of drugs, surgery, and later on, radiation. They used heavy metals, toxic metals, like mercury and lead, to displace the original disease. Long before the use of local anesthesia, infections and death were common. Many patients feared the so-called modern medicine and were unwilling to have this abrasive approach to