Preview

Dr Pepper - 7up, Inc. - Squirt Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dr Pepper - 7up, Inc. - Squirt Case
Dr Pepper/7Up, Inc
Squirt® Brand

The brand manager of Squirt, Kate Cox has been tasked with coming up with the brand’s annual advertising campaign. Kate met with the brand’s advertising agency to discuss some ideas for new market targeting, and product positioning because Squirt’s recent case sales volume has fallen, as well as increased competition, and a change in many of the markets that Squirt currently serves. Currently Squirt’s total market by ethnicity shows that 73% of its market is Caucasian, 15% African-American, and the remaining 12% are Hispanic. One of the major problems with declining sales is the increase of Hispanic communities in markets that were previously popular markets for Squirt. So what does Squirt need to do to turn this around? The problem facing Squirt is how they can effectively position their brand to increase sales as well as capture the Hispanic consumer market without spreading their advertising dollars too thin. Carbonated Soft Drink Industry The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is enormous. In 2000, more Americans drank soft drinks than water. The production and distribution of soft drinks involve concentrate producers (basic flavors), bottlers (add sweetener and carbonated water), and retailers. Of all the retailers available for distribution to customers, grocery stores and supermarkets account for about 31% of sales. There are three major competitors in the soft drink market (Coca-Cola, 44.1%; Pepsi-Cola, 31.4%; Dr Pepper/Seven Up, 14.7%). Each competitor spends a lot of money on advertising their brand through promotions, and consumer price discounting. Concentrate producers and bottlers usually share advertising costs because bottlers can target markets locally while producers focus on the bigger picture. While colas are still the most popular in the CSD Industry, they are starting to lose ground. Flavored soft drinks are beginning to become more popular due to the changes in the U.S. population

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cadbury Crush Case

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Exhibit 5, from 1985-1989, Orange crushes’ market share decreased from 22% (1985) to 8% (1989), this data shows that prior to the entrance of Coca Cola’s Slice and Pepsi’s Minute Maid, Orange Crush had more of the market share which at the time, they were positioned toward groups between the ages of 13-40. Since 1985, Crush repositioned itself to target individuals between the ages of 12-17. Appendix D shows that Pepsi Co. and Minute Maid entered the market with their own orange soda brands capturing a large portion of the orange soda market. These new juggernaut competitors reduced Crush’s market share consistently each year by positioning themselves in the 15-30 year old market. Initially, we thought it would be wise for Crush to revert back to its’ original target market, however with the emergence of Pepsi Co.’s Slice and Coca Cola’s Minute Maid into the market, and the fact that both brands are targeting individuals roughly between the ages of 15-30 (Crushes’ previous target market) (Exhibit 8), we believe it would be best for Crush to make an adjustment to their current positioning strategy. Shifting from their current age range (teens 12-17)(Exhibit 13) to younger children between the ages of 6-16 would tap into a market segment not currently being pursued by the new dominant Orange Soda companies. This shift would differentiate Crush even further from their competition, and as a result lead to more market share capture potential and competitive advantage due to the fact that they will be the first major orange soda brand to enter into this new target market. Secondly, the alignment with a younger age bracket…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This case describes the various aspects of carbonated soft drink industry and the focuses on Squirt’s annual advertising and promotion plan in 2001. Squirt is a brand under the Dr Pepper/Seven Up, inc. The brand manager was concerned about the market targeting and product positioning and consulted advertising agency, Foote, Cone & Belding. The case also focuses on the entire industry structure and the marketing techniques used by the various leading companies so the Squirt’s annual advertising and promotion plan can be successful, and proper techniques to be used to target the growing Hispanic community in the markets where Squirt was popular. . The main aspect for the marketing planning for the brand, Squirt, is to focus on the positioning analysis, advertising and promotion expenditures, and competitor spending. The case also shows the opportunity in the Hispanic market and plan development for the target market.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Background: The Atlanta–based Coca-Cola Company controls about 65 per cent of the soft-drink market. Pepsi-Cola has about 15 per cent. The rest belong to other soft-drink products.…

    • 3630 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Concentrate Producers and Bottlers were two of the four major participants that were involved in the production and distribution of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs) in the United States.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr Pepper Snapple Case

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In early September 2007, Andrew Barker emerged from a lengthy discussion on the energy beverage market in the United States. As a brand manager for Snapple beverages at the Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., he was charged with assessing whether or not a profitable market opportunity existed for a new energy beverage brand to be produced, marketed, and distributed by the company in 2008. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. was the only major domestic nonalcoholic beverage company in the United States without a significant branded energy drink of its own. The decision to explore a new energy beverage was made by senior company management as part of a corporate business strategy to focus on opportunities in high-growth and high-margin beverage businesses. After launching a ready-to-drink sports drink, the Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. believed they should put into consideration of introducing a new energy drink beverage.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soft drinks are profitable because it is a $60 billion industry in the United States alone. Not only is it profitable in the United States, but both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have expanded their franchises internationally and both have become competitive brands. It is estimated that the average American can consume about 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks a year. According to the article, Americans drink more soda than any other beverages on the market today, such as sports drinks, juices, and beers. This makes carbonated soft drinks more profitable than the other beverages because it has a higher consumption rate. Another reason why carbonated soft drinks are profitable is that it is easy to make since it is made up of a flavor base with added sweetener and carbonated water. These main ingredients are relatively cheap compared to the bottling process. Since 1970, the growth of carbonated soft drinks continues to rise 3% per year for the next 30 years because of diet carbonated soft drinks and other flavored drinks. Soft drinks are also found in supermarkets, convenient stores, vending machines, and restaraunts. This makes the soft drinks more accessible to their customers. Soft drinks are also consumed by cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, and fountain drinks.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The threat from substitutes mostly depends on buyers’ behavior and price performance of substitutes. As the bottlers are the direct buyers of the concentrate producers, the ultimate buyer is the end consumers who drink the soft drinks. The end consumers have wide variety of choices and therefore they have higher tendency to switch to other type of soft drink based on price. As stated in the case, price is a major determinant on the sale of soft drinks.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cory Wells Coke And Pepsi

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Coke and Pepsi have been long time rivals with competition being the name of the game in their industry. Historically, the soft drink industry has been so profitable because Americans tend to love soft drinks, more than any other beverages out there. Americans soda consumption grew by an average of 3% a year since 1970. Coke and Pepsi had an average annual growth of 10% from 1975 to 1995. Not to mention, the internal rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has only increased both of their profits. They also both had a very high market share. Coke and Pepsi had an average of 10% net profit in sales.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pepsi vs Coke

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For more than a century, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics, strategies such as blind taste tests, and reward initiatives for the consumer, they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business, “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo, Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want, whether it be soft-drink brands or in PepsioCo’s case, snacks. With only one soft-drink market, the two competitors have no choice but to increase sales by stealing the other competitor’s clients. This led to the term, the “cola wars” which was first used to describe the “mutually-targeted” marketing campaigns in the 1980s and 1990s. A revival of the Cola wars is occurring now as PepsiCo remakes a well-known comparative commercial and resurfaces old tactics used in 1979. A closer look at their advertising styles and market shares will provide us with an idea of how the future will be for these two competitors.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Squirt

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The soft drink industry has three major participants in the production and distribution; concentrate producers, bottlers, and retail outlets. Concentrate producers are responsible for consumer advertising and promotion programs, product development and planning and market research. The bottler’s responsibility is to set up local and retail trade promotions. Among this is selling and servicing retail outlets, placements and…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    April 13th 1992, PepsiCo introduced an exciting change to its popular Pepsi product in the test cities of Providence, Denver, and Dallas and called it Crystal Pepsi. This is believed by many to have been one of the best ideas that PepsiCo had ever came out with, as they simply removed any and all coloring from Pepsi, creating a healthier and visually stimulating product. During the 1980's, Madison Avenue advertisers created one of our society's most aberrant spectacles yet, the pinnacle of decades of pop culture and advertising prowess, The Cola Wars. In our technological, media-driven, consumer-happy, and product-driven culture, selling and consuming soda has certainly become one of our biggest American pastimes. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo squared off for decades in various advertising coups trying to sell more soda to the already overly indulgent American public. A seemingly easy goal, but these companies have tried everything from using pop-stars, bold and daring challenges and most recently the chance to win a billion dollars on national television just for drinking their products. Throughout the…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi, the two main players in the duopoly market, have benefited from average growth of 3% since 1970 in the CSD market. There are many substitutes to CSD’s such as; milk, coffee, bottled water, beer, juices, tea, wine, sports drinks, and tap water yet American’s drank more soda than any other beverage. Coke and Pepsi competed fiercely for market share and this competition built brand recognition for both companies. Continuous improvements are always being made to the production and distribution networks of CSD’s, which consist of four major participants: concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, and suppliers. Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth around 10% from 1975 through the mid- 1990’s. The combination of a consistently growing market, fierce head to head competition, brand recognition, and efficient production and distribution networks made the CSD industry extremely profitable.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca Cola Case

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Coca-Cola began working with franchised bottles to be made available wherever and whenever a consumer might want it. It also initiated “lifestyle” advertising, emphasizing the role of Coke in a consumer’s life. In the early 1970s, the US soft-drinks market was on the verge of maturity, and as the major players, Coke and Pepsi offered products that 'looked the same and tasted the same,’ substantial market share growth seemed unlikely. However, Coke and Pepsi kept revitalizing the market through product modifications and pricing/promotion/distribution tactics. The soft drink industry sold to consumers through five principal channels: food stores, convenience and gas, fountain, vending, and mass merchandisers.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays