Preview

Discuss The Benefits Of Snp System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss The Benefits Of Snp System
Current Benefits
There are a variety of benefits with the current system that any reform to the system should aim to retain. Additionally, there are some core values that any voting procedure should maintain. These were succinctly drawn out by Lord Selkirk “having a voting system that is efficient, correct and appropriate is going to be very important and they will need to have a system where the voting is clear beyond doubt” . It is imperative that any alteration to the voting procedure of either House retains these principles.
The first and most important current benefit is votes are recorded , this is particularly important for MPs whose re-election could depend on their voting record. There are a number of Parliaments around the world
…show more content…
The vast majority of Members interviewed stated this as a current benefit to the system. Owen Thompson, by contrast, was not convinced this is a real benefit . The SNP is a close group and he can easily have access to the higher members of his own party . Time in the lobbies, however, would provide him with the opportunity to speak to the Ministerial or Shadow Ministerial team. First Past the Post promotes a two party system , which tends to lead to large parties, and so time in the lobbies for un-vetted access to Ministers can prove invaluable to a back bench MP who otherwise may be unable to meet with more senior colleagues . On top of this, Ministers are hard to speak to without their advisers surrounding them, so being able to speak to them freely is highly beneficial to numerous members. This benefit was further highlighted by Baroness Hooper , who stated on occasions time in the lobbies is the only chance for Peers to speak to one another. Numerous Peers don’t have offices or office staff; they can spend much of their time in the library with limited contact with other members. Admittedly this does appear like a weak argument; nevertheless, a significant part of politics is about deal making and building relationships , the lobbies can help to facilitate …show more content…
This again adds to the idea that members are engaged in the debate and are making their minds up on the topic during the debate. Moreover, the close proximity to the debate and the division helps Members to know what they are voting on. On some days, MPs and Peers will attend a wide variety of debates, voting on them straight after discussing them helps to keep the debate fresh and adds impetus to the vote.
The final aspect of the close proximity of divisions to the chamber, quite simply, means MPs and Peers need to be on site . Although late at night this could be viewed as an inconvenience , the act of recording a vote is a vital part of a Member’s role. The current method used is a way to validate the identity of the Member. Following the controversy in the 18th Century of Members sending their staff to vote on their behalf it is important to retain a validation aspect to the voting system.
All these benefits serve to prove that Members value the use of the division lobbies to vote, as they provide Members with a key opportunity to meet colleagues and to build relations. Furthermore, they are useful for ensuring votes are recorded and Members’ identities can be verified. All things considered, any reforms should aim to retain these benefits, or potentially even enhance

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    However, the need for the Senate is still prominent, as they are needed to ensure the soundness of bills being passed. It is for this reason that minor and modest changes should be made over time to regulate its transparency and openness to the public when it comes to spending and appointing Senators. Although these changes are minor, it will allow for the Senate to remain the same role in the Canadian system as it has, while satisfying the public with insight regarding their decisions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy. The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how politics works in Britain. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster. This in turn means any of our votes just don’t count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties continue to focus all their time, money and effort on a handful of 'marginal seats', so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The additional member system, like every other electoral system has both advantages and disadvantages. Which of these outweighs the other remains debatable. The additional member system is described as a type of PR (proportional representation) system where the number of votes is equal to the number of seats gained. The AMS is a hybrid system with two votes and two systems mixed together, the first vote being your constituency vote and the second, the regional vote. There are 129 members of the Scottish parliament and there are two ways an MSP can be elected. Scotland is divided into 73 constituencies and each constituency elects one MSP. These are known as constituency MSPs and are elected by 'first past the post' in exactly the same way as MPs are elected to Westminster. This is the elector's first vote. The second vote is used to elect 56 additional members. Scotland is divided into 8 parliamentary Regions and each region elects 7 regional MSPs. In the second vote the voter votes for a party rather than a candidate. The parties are then allocated a number of additional members to make the overall result more proportional. The regional MSP’s are selected from lists compiled by the parties. Each person living in Scotland has a total of 8 MSPs to represent them and the overall result is fairly proportional.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The AMS and FPTP are voting systems in use for the Scottish Parliament and House of Commons elections respectively. It can be argued that AMS gives voters more choice and better representation than FPTP, and in order to assess the validity of this argument 3 key indicators must be analysed: constituency links; proportionality and representation of smaller parties.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The select committees have a very effective role as they have the power to question and cross examine ministers, their civil servants and any witnesses they may want to call from any external organisations. MPs gain a lot of knowledge and expertise while being in the select committees, which can be a very good thing as they are able to wisely question and analyse the policies that are being debated. They are able to request access to government papers, so they are able to increase their knowledge on the specific issue.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most successful pressure groups still tend to focus on lobbying the Westminster Parliament despite the availability of numerous other access points. Discuss (25 Marks)…

    • 1172 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, for the constituency this is the best thing as their representative is focused solely on what is needed for them, therefore being very responsive to whatever they need. However and in contrast as the Senate have a longer term they almost have a sense of relief and stability within their membership.…

    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Influencing Lawmaking

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The possible advantages to having so many different groups participate in the lawmaking process are clear, no one group can gain too much power and each group can have its own vote. The groups can each be independent of one another when the voting takes place. This allows for a fairer legislative system in the United States.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress Dbq

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Obviously, it is difficult to keep track of a representatives every move in the deep dark chamber of congress[Doc G]. In some congress people’s opinion, this anonymity leads them to believe that they don’t have any responsibility to their constituents. This is a classic example a a psychological phenomenon called groupthink, in which anonymity provides a cover for risky and generally worse decision. But, because of the anonymity and the feeling of a responsibility to political parties, the central goal of a legislator can be skewed. A solution to this problem could be the increasing involvement people in the processes of democracy[Doc D]. This should also be the goal of the congress people, not ties to an established political party or group. The people need to be constantly engaged in the processes of their democracy, not only the presidential election. Politicians have to be elected consistently, this should not be intertwined with getting in the favor of political organizations they are associated with [Doc C]. Establishing a role to the people, and the people a role creates a system beneficial for everyone involved. Then political election will be the result of what policy they make, and what policies people vote…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    help provide members opportunities to be heard on Capitol Hill. There are a lot of…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore another example of the way first past the post suits Britain is the rough justice it presents. Rough justice is when an unpopular or weak government is over ridden and taken out of government. Such as in the 1990’s, the conservatives had been in power since 1979 and became more and more unpopular until 1997 when finally labour won power with a huge margin. This helps the voters choose what they want and how they want the country to be run.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Effect of this elaborate part machinery can be crudely measured by extent to which party members vote together in House and…

    • 4804 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays