They're many differences between both movies the nineties version and the original. Which are the weapons they used, in the older version they use swords while in the nineties version they use 9mm pistols. I think that having the use of pistols instead of swords helps me realize the severity of the situation. I believe that having pistols used shows the lethalness of the sword. Another huge difference is the clothes they wear are very different in the new movie the Montague's usually where dark colored, and the Capulet's were vibrantly colored but the opposite ahs occurred in the new movie. In my opinion they must have forgot which family usually wore what. I believe that the Montague's like bright colored shirts because they usually are happy and joyful so they wear brightly colored shirts. But on the other hand they do have some similarities.
Both movies the nineties version and the original are similar in many ways. One way in how they are similar are the type of English they speak they speak a mid English not an old English and certainly not a modern English. I believe that the director used this to help relate the event back to the original. I also believe that they must have had to study their lines for long periods of time. The director actually kept the same characters from the original he did not cut any one from the movie. I believe he did this not do dishonor William Shakespeare. In my opinion is the best writer that ever lived. Finally the director used the same plot in this movie and in the original, every character had the same role as in the original movie. In my opinion the director did not leave out any parts or scenes from the original movie. I think that the director did not cut out any of the parts because he wanted it to be just like it was in the original only in modern times.
After viewing both of the movies the nineties version and the original I can see the similarities and differences clearly and have an understanding of why William Shakespeare wrote this play and why it is so widely known.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
There are many differences between the movie and play. Some of which are subtle, but there. However, not all will be mentioned. One of the differences is that in the movie, Past is a female and in the play, Past is a male. Another difference…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Zeffirelli’s and luhrmann’s individual movies on the Shakespearean play of Romeo and Juliet, they show a great deal of focus on the theme of conflict, which had occurred mainly between the two rivals of the play, the Montagues and the Capulets. Although the movies are based on the same play, they differ quite a lot. Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet was set in the 1600s, which was accurate for the play. For luhrmann’s version, he set the movie in the modern era which inevitably causes a drastic difference between the two movies but they both focused their themes of conflict on the help of sound effects, costumes, and visual movements.…
- 690 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann reenactments of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet are wonderful and was and still is very famous for its use of words and the plot of the play itself. All though there are many differences between these two films there are many similarities to the reenactments. The characters from the films had many things in common the character were very funny with their acting and put emotions into their part. The plot line between the two films was very different but had many similarities, the plot was the same by the Montague and Capulet running into each other and then starting an argument leading to a conflict many moments later. The family feud is a strong and very hostile emotion between these two…
- 246 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The original play happens around 1500s in Italy. It was a time when people still fought with swords and lived in old decorated buildings. For instance, said, “What I mean is, if they make us angry we’ll pull out our swords” by Sampson (Act I , Scene I).Thus people living that era still used ancient weapons. The movie, in contrast, is set in 1900s in America Florida when people using guns and driving cars. Skyscrapers are full of the city with huge screens rolling the news and advertisements again and again seen from the movie. There is an intense fight with guns and grenades that takes place at a gas station between Capulets and Montagues at the beginning of the movie. It even triggers an explosion, something that could never happen in the original play. Although the plots do not change fundamentally, as both the movie and the play have a fight at the beginning, the movie is not only more modern, but also more exciting and more appeals to contemporary audience.…
- 864 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
The changes in the movie are deeply flamboyant. One of the biggest changes is the main event for the cause of the Salem Trials. In the movie, the audience sees the girls running to the woods very surreptitiously, practicing witchcraft, in the play it was mentioned through dialogue in Act 1. In addition to changes, in the play Reverend Hale states that he signed 72 death warrants, but in the movie he signed 17 death warrants. There was only one deletion that I saw that was very noticeable. In the play when John Proctor was accused, he snached his warrant out of his wife Elizabeth's hand, but in the play he never showed any anger towards Elizabeth. Further…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the Luhrmann version, the Montagues and Capulets would cars instead of having to walk and ride horses. The “prince”, chief of officers, would use a helicopter and uses a megaphone to tell Tybalt and Benvolio to lower their weapons. In the Zeffirelli version, the prince would ride a horse and will have his men follow him. Another difference is that the Lord Montague was riding a limousine in the Luhrmann version. In the Zeffirelli version, Lord Montague runs to the Capulets place and wants to fight Lord Capulet. Lady Capulet was trying to hold Lord Capulet back but he didn’t let her. In conclusion, there are many differences between both versions of the play but are very…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Right when the movie begins in the 1998 film, there is something different from the 1968 film. At the beginning of the fight scene in scene 1 it shows Benvolio with the servants already. In the 1968 film, Benvolio shows up to stop the fight between the Capulet servants and the Montague servants. After the fight scene, the Montagues ask Benvolio where Romeo is. In the 1998 version, Montague and Lady Montague seem almost disgusted that Romeo is out sulking. The 1968 film portrays his parents as feeling sympathetic for their son. When Benvolio does find Romeo, Romeo is supposed to explain his heartbreak to Benvolio. The 1998 film does just that while the 1968 film completely cut it out of the movie. Romeo is supposed to be someone who is love-struck and confused but the 1998 film portrayed him as someone who had reasons for his actions.…
- 557 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The text version is different because it tells you what is going to happen in each scene. It is read by one person (or if you’re in a class, multiple people will read it). It is written in Shakespeare’s language, but it is changed so it is easier to understand. It also has side notes or foot notes, so you can understand what they are saying. Usually what is written in the book is different then what is in the movie. In the book during the fight scene with Mercutio, Tybalt, and Romeo, Tybalt kills Mercutio with a sword and Romeo runs after Tybalt killing him in the street. Also in the balcony scene, Romeo climbs the wall to Juliet’s balcony and stands with Juliet on her balcony. There really wasn’t a wedding scene in the book. During the death scene, Romeo fights Paris and says his goodbyes to Juliet and kills himself, and then she in return kills herself. The movies leave stuff out that the book has.…
- 736 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
First, I will discuss some of the plot changes that were implemented to adapt to a modern day movie's visual capabilities. If we were to read just the play, the only pictures we would see would have to be imagined. Since we now have the ability to see a movie, the director had to change some of the story to help us visualize some of the scenes. One such example is when, in the play, Tybalt recognizes Romeo's voice at the Capulet masked ball. When Tybalt hears him, he becomes enraged. In the film this is different, Romeo takes off his mask at the fountain, and forgets it there. As Romeo is following Juliet, Tybalt sees him; however, the results are the same. Tybalt becomes angered, and vows to get revenge on Romeo. Another example of a change in plot is when Romeo visits the apothecary. Romeo, in the movie, sees the apothecary in Verona, where as Romeo sees him in Mantua, in the play. Finally when Romeo and Juliet kill themselves, the Friar does not see them first, and the Prince does not say that Mercutio and Paris were his kinsmen.…
- 428 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The story, Romeo and Juliet was filled with violence and love. Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet loved each other, even their parents hatred for each other didn’t prevent the star-crossed lovers from being together. Many lives were taken away due to the rivalry between the Montagues and Capulets, including Romeo and Juliet’s. The characters in the three versions of Romeo and Juliet had many similarities and differences. Juliet and Lady Montague stood out to me the most while watching “Romeo + Juliet” by Baz Luhrmann, reading “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare and reading “Romeo and/or Juliet” by Ryan North. In my opinion, the most interesting version was the movie by Baz Luhrmann.…
- 1377 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The two main film interpretations of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" are Zeffirelli's, made in 1968, and Luhrmann's, made in 1997. Although they use the same original script written by Shakespeare, these two films are very different. Zeffirelli's is set in the 16th century, at the time when the screenplay would have first been written whereas Luhrmann has set his film in modern time but still using the Shakespearian language. The most popular and well-known scene of "Romeo and Juliet" is the balcony scene where Romeo and Juliet first declare their love for each other.…
- 706 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In contrast to the similarities, there were also many differences that appeared. One example would be the absence of Aunt Alexandra in the film. Due to the fact that Aunt Alexandra was not present, I was not able to…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Romeo and Juliet is a play of love and hatred. In the centre of it all is Juliet, barely fourteen and still reliant on her wet nurse, yet willing to take her own life then to live without the one she loves. In the short four days, in which the play takes place, Juliet faces more than most in a lifetime. She is forced into marriage, she secretly marries an enemy of her house, her new husband kills her cousin and is exiled only allowing her one night of wedded bliss. She has to pretend to kill herself only to find her husband dead beside her, after which she takes her own life. During this emotional rollercoaster Juliet changes from an innocent, naïve thirteen-year-old to a defiant and independent young heroine. I have chosen Act 1 Scene 3, Act 3 Scene 5 (lines 69-242), and her soliloquy in Act 4 Scene 4 to compare, as they show different stages of Juliet's change in character.…
- 958 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Now you may remember the first difference I talked about, which was the different settings between the play and the movie. Now even though that's a difference a similarity can also come out of this. The village in the play where everything took place was Padua. In the movie the high school the students attend was named Padua high school. Another similarity is the gender of all the characters generally stayed the same between the play and the movie, this helped make the comparing less confusing and more understandable. One huge similarity is the plot in both the play and the movie generally stays the same except for minor differences. The character personalities are generally the same also. Along with Kat and Bianca are sisters in the play and the movie. One thing which is kind of a similarity is Baptisa, also known as Walter wants his eldest daughter to date and get married first. In both the play and movie at the beginning Patrick, also known as Petruchio doesn’t seem to have any interest in Kat while he later ends up falling in love with her. At first Patrick was just going in for the money that he was receiving a bet, which he later regretted since Kat had to find out through Joey at prom. But it really did all pay off in the end. In the movie Kat is more verbally mean than anything, while in the play Kate in more physically mean and abusive, considering when she wants something and didn’t get she would physically harm to get what…
- 1114 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There are several diffrences between the play and the movie but the main diffrence is the setting of the two. In the movie by Rupert Goold the setting of the ‘’play’’ is in the 1900’s when World War II was taking place. MacBeth and all the other characters are in a Nazi-based area. Where as in the play originally created by William Shakespeare, it is taken place in the olden days, way long ago where it is taken place in a castle with kings and such. Another great diffrence inbetween the two are the weapons used. In the original play the main weapons are swords and sheilds and daggers and so on, where as in Goold’s movie the weapons are semi-automatic machine…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays