Preview

Describe and Analyze Changing Views Toward the Concept of a “Civil Peace”

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1357 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe and Analyze Changing Views Toward the Concept of a “Civil Peace”
2003 DBQ Actual Student Response
Rubric score:9

Question: describe and analyze changing views toward the concept of a “civil peace” (Burgfrieden) in Germany 1914-1918.

In August of 1914, the German Reichstag made two major decisions. First, it began mobilization for World War I. Also it declared (Burgfrieden, or “civil peace” in which all previous issues and parties would be st aside for the duration of the war. As the years progressed, the peoples opinions changed in regards to this policy. In 1914, at the announcement, there was awe and happiness. By the middle of the war, in the years 1915 and 1916, people began to ignore the policy, as they were tired of the war. By 1918, opinion was divided, mostly between supporters and dissenters of the war. These views show how the progress of World War I affected the German population. In a speech on August 1, 1914, Emperor Wilhelm II beseeched the German people to stand together “like brothers” to unite the country (doc. 1). The speech was surely biased, as the emperor needed support in his declaration of war. A photograph of his speech (doc. 2) suggests that the people did support the emperor, as the people appear to be waving their hats and cheering. This was a time of nationalism and the people shown most likely felt certain they would win. Many women were in support of the policy because it meant that they, who were already fighting for rights such as suffrage and equality, would be allowed to take part. This idea is supported by doc. 4, in which a women’s rights advocate describes the euphoria they felt at being allowed to help. Also in 1914 and 1915 there were people who, though in shock, knew they must be supportive. This shock is described in doc.5 as a columnist wrote of it leaving silence in the streets. S. Jobs, the writer was liberal and may have been against the war, which could have affected the way he viewed people’s reactions. The social Democratic Party printed an article

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil Peace Dbq

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Germany, in 1914, a civil peace was declared at the time of the proclamation of war. This meant that all previous inner and exterior conflicts would be put to the side until after the war. At the same time that this was declared, the troops were being mobilized to fight. German citizens’ opinions changed from being excited during the proclamation of war to ignoring the main effects and law of civil peace during the war, and then to being upset and frustrated after the war. I think it is important to notice how this behavior changes from the start to the end of the war.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Weimar republic was introduced on the back of Germany’s defeat at WWI, the resignation of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the widely despised signature of the Treaty of Versailles. These conditions led to its collapse in 1933, and also the great rise in popularity for the Nazi party during this period. There is no doubt that a number of economic factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Weimar republic and the rise of the Nazis, however, numerous other factors also played a part. Some historians consider a lack of effective opposition a major contributing in the expansion of the Nazis. It has also been argued that the appeal of the Nazi party won them many votes. Finally, the impact of other political factors cannot be ignored when considering this issue.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burgfrieden dbq

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Changing views towards a civil peace in Germany from 1914 to 1918 was affected by the progress of World War I When the Burgfrieden was first announced in 1914 the crowds of German people cheered for the Burgfrieden. From 1915 to 1916, by the middle of the WWI, people began to get tired of the war and the high prices for food it brought and corruption it brought about. By 1918, the opinions on Burgfrieden were divided between those who believed the war was necessarye and those who thought it was harmful.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As World War I came to a conclusion, the German people faced an inherent complication: what was to be the future of Germany? Democracy was a paltry response to such a climactic part of history. The Weimar Republic not only deteriorated the already feeble nation, but became a mixing pot for the future of the Third Reich. Once the previous leaders of the Weimar Republic conceded defeat, Adolf Hitler rose in his ranks until he accepted his position as Führer on August 1st, 1921 for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. They pushed through many different trials and victories, and finally became chancellor on January 30th, 1933.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book “Imperial Germany 1871-1918” by Volker R. Berghahn has the under title Economy, Society, Culture and Politics and was first published in 1994 by Berghahn books. The used edition is the revised and expanded edition published in 2005 and summarizes the events in the ‘Kaiserreich’ (1871-1918). Furthermore, the book has 388 pages and is divided in five parts which are Economy, Society, Culture, the Realm of Politics, and World War I. Each part has numerous under parts giving the reader detailed information about each part. In addition, the author did tremendous research on the German Empire, founded by Otto von Bismarck in 1871 and lasting until the end of World War I, to clarify the broader outlines of the development between 1871 and 1918 and to explain why Germany went to war in 1914 and lost that conflict four years later.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Berghahn, V.R. 1973. Germany and the Approach of War in 1914. New York: St. Martin 's Press.…

    • 9995 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the years 1900-1914 there was arguably a significant move towards democracy within Germany. There were general desire for political and social reform and many wished for constitutional change. However, come 1914 Germany still remained nearly as autocratic as it had been back in 1900. Over this period it can clearly be shown through 3 key areas: the Constitution, German policy and events, that, regardless of attempted moves towards democracy, Germany truly was an entrenched autocracy in this period.…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the First World War broke out in 1914 the political divisions that had existed before narrowed as the German people became united in the defence of their country. The Kaiser’s declaration that he ‘knew no political parties, only Germans’, is evidence and a reflection of the national sense of patriotism that was felt throughout the Germany at the outbreak of war. The division between the right and the left ceased to exist with the SPD voting for war credits as did the clear division by the poor and the rich with men from the countryside as well as the towns joining together to fight. However, as the war progressed, the resentment towards the war began to grow; this was due to the fact that Germany had experienced huge losses and also because of the economic crisis that they were facing. Therefore, because of this, the First World War increased the political divisions in Germany.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Primarily due to the harsh conditions of The Treaty of Versailles the German economy was reaching failure. The treaty reduced Germany’s territory by 14 percent and its population by 6.5 million citizens. It created for Germany large minorities outside its new borders and for the time being an unlimited reparations liability (Schwabe, 864). Germany entered a period of severe economic depression and widespread unemployment. After the loss of World War I, Germany was emotionally a battered and broken country. After the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, the German people could not help but feel betrayed and angry at the Treaty’s conditions. It was overall a difficult time for the people of Germany. The Germans’ most painful part of the treaty to accept was the fact that they were ultimately being blamed for the war and the responsibility of causing damage on the others involved. In other words, Germany had to take full responsibility for beginning World War I. The Germans resented the fact that the entire blame of the war was placed on their country. The treaty left many Germans angry, looking for someone to blame for the loss of the war and someone to lead…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Separate Peace Analysis

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The great writer George Orwell once stated, “Writing a book is a horrible, exhausting struggle, like a long bout of some painful illness. One would never undertake such a thing if one were not." (Orwell). Knowles had this same struggle, and like Orwell used it to his advantage. The novels of John Knowles reflect his personal background and frequently explore the time period in which he lived through WWII. Throughout his life he reflected on his childhood, nurtured his love and ability of writing, and was rewarded for his great works in literature.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler in his proclamation dated February 1, 1933 made it apparent to the German people that they rightfully and with good intention “…entered the fight in 1914 without the slightest feeling of guilt on its part and filled only with the desire to defend the Fatherland…” (Hitler, 1933 p. 1). Yet, after their defeat and because of broken promises perpetrated by the Western leaders the reparations that were forced upon all of Germany not only affected them as individually, but also the entire nation in an adverse way. Furthermore, the demands placed upon Germany had altered global trade balance. It was Hitler’s belief that, Germany suffered under an oppressive state of being for “Fourteen years of Marxism have ruined Germany; one year of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the signing of the Versailles Treaty in 1919, Germany was in an uproar. Called a “diktat” or a slave-treaty by the German people, the Versailles Treaty came to be blamed for everything from the poverty to the increasing unemployment in post WWI Germany (Pillar, 7). With as many as 30 political parties, not only was Germany in the midst of an economic…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was a monumental stage in German history, helping to shape German history for arguably the best part of thirty years. It can be argued that the Treaty was the most significant event since the unification of Germany in 1890. The short term consequences were also highly prominent as over 300,000 Germans fled to America in the years 1917-23. Moreover many Germans were aggrieved by the Treaty, this lead to public exploits (Kapp Putsch and Munich Putsch) that lead to casualties accumulating into the 1000’s. With so much death and despair in Germany in the 1920’s the Treaty of Versailles effectively crippled Germany both economically and mentally. Furthermore the effects did not only stretch to the late 20’s, Hitler used the Treaty as a major campaigning point to secure chancellorship in 1933. Hitler still held severe indignations over the Treaty of Versailles and still held a personal vendetta with the parent countries that imposed such harsh terms on Germany in 1917. Although the Treaty of Versailles was a pivotal stage in shaping German history there are other corresponding factors such as the erection of the Berlin wall in 1961, consequently perpetually separating East and West Berlin for 28 years. After the wall came down in 1989, Germany became reunified in 1990, arguably the most significant turning point in German history as it enabled Germany to prosper as a whole nation, since then Germany has gone on to establish itself as a world superpower, both militarily and economically. It is difficult to come to a definitive answer on what the biggest turning point is, however I plan to analyse pivotal points in German history, dating from 1917-1990.…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Peacemaker Analysis

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Peace would result in an unstoppable power that others would want to emulate or become a part of, resulting in an indissoluble union” (Rice, 2008, p. 411) Dr. Kings peace movement was a perfect example of this. The people that were tired of being treated unfairly followed him. However, the people that didn’t want peace went against Dr. King eventually killing him. I think of peace is black and white because you either want to live in a worry-free and happy world with peace or live in a world of sadness and death without peace. The Peacemaker explained that having peace meant, “They would be without fear, sadness and anger”. (Rice, 2008, p. 411) There could be no way to be in between peace.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays