Demononomanie Confessions And Demonology: Jean Bodin

Witchcraft confessions and demonology
Jean Bodin was one of the most esteemed European writers on satanic witchcraft, and also among the most radical.
With his De la Demononomanie des Sorciers, Jean Bodin attacks the sceptics of demonology as much as the legions of demons and execrable witches’ supposedly plotting universal destruction. He deduces a whole chapter in his book to witches confessions. Some judges hesitated to condemn witches as their stories were so strange that they must be ‘fables’. These confessions tell of nocturnal assemblies where witches and demons are said to fornicate and dance naked, where members of an underground cult affirm and reaffirm their allegiance to the Devil, where would-be plots are made and spells are
Nevertheless, thousands of accused ‘witches’ produced these first-person narratives. Through confession, accused witches were in effect constrained to reproduce demonological theory, each reiteration serving to confirm both the reality of the sabbat and the necessity of the witch-hunt.

Demonologists restored to confession as a weapon for convicting and condemning the members of what they perceived to be a satanic cult threatening the very fabric of society. Indeed, witches were believed to strike hard where the community was most vulnerable. But this eminently practical objective pursued by demonologists was inextricably linked to a theoretical agenda: understanding the occult world of witches and their clandestine activities.

Through confessions, the demonologists sought access to the world of witches that remained stubbornly elusive without these first-person narratives. Bodin emphasized on confessions as a vehicle for information on the sabbat. To quote Walter Stephens, ‘witches were expert witnesses to the reality of demons’. And while some visual traces of their clandestine activities were believed to remain such as devil marks. Therefore the judge had to listen more than
In the Mallus Maleficarum , references to Johann Nider’s Formicarus reside comfortably alongside passages from Aquinas , both texts serving as authorities. Facts from different confessions began to overlap and therefore eventually it became in effect its own self-legitimate discourse.
In addition a method of parallel passages was used to elucidate confessions. Borrowed from biblical exegesis, this method was based on the principle that ‘ nothing is conveyed in a hidden manner in one place of the Holy Scripture that is not explained elsewhere in a manifest manner’. The judicial confessions extracted during trials constituted a veritable corpus – demonologists elucidated more obscure passages. ‘Now to confirm the proof of witches confessions, one must link them with the confessions of other witches.’ In this way, raw data generated by new confessions were confirmed by pre-existing