Preview

Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values
Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13). When the minimum conception of reality is applied to various ethical schools of thought: cultural …show more content…
The idea of right and wrong varies from culture to culture. The five tenets of cultural relativism going to depth defining moral codes. Complications and moral questions arise when one culture begins harming another—Nazi genocide, war, imperialism, etc. Geographic boundaries blur in our technologically advanced, globalized world. The most daunting logical challenge presented by cultural relativism is it hinders a society from judging the codes or values of another society and even our own (Lecture 1). Therefore, atrocities could be committed with no consequences or moral justice. “The conscientious moral agent is someone impartially with the interests of everyone affected by what he or she does; who carefully sifts facts and examines their implications…” (Rachels 14). Cultural relativism challenges reason and impartiality because its tenets are logically inconsistent. It benefits more people to condemn or questions the values behind certain acts committed, such as genocide, stoning, gang rape, and …show more content…
This suggests human moral choices should be made with only their own selfish interests at heart. If we do the best for ourselves, it will benefit others. The problem with this theory is that a person may have both selfish and good intentions when committing and act of kindness. Since ethical egoism only allows one option—self-interest, it is perpetuating flawed logic that would not hold up if reason is applied to the theory. Also, ethical egoism is an “arbitrary doctrine, in the same way that racism is arbitrary…” and it violates the “Principle of Equal Treatment” (Rachels

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism—specifically ethical egoism—argues that our moral evaluations should be made in terms of our desires and goals. Something that promotes what I want is regarded as right; something that interferes with what I want, or prevents me from reaching my goals, is regarded as wrong.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egoism Ethical Principle

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Egoism is one of four popular ethical theories. The principle, or basic premise behind the Egoism theory is that self-interest is most important. By definition, egoism is the theory that one’s self is, or should be, the motivation and the goal of one’s own action (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). An argument can be made that no human ever makes a decision without considering themselves, or that there is no true altruistic act anyways. So, it is important to differentiate a normal decision a person makes, and decision a person makes based on the egoism theory. A person may make a decision for themselves, for someone else, for God, or even for the good of the planet. Even if that decision benefits them personally, it would not be considered egoism because they are not considering themselves only. This principle provides that a person with any set of morals will still do what is in their best interest, and only what is in their best interest when making a decision (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Whether or not others benefit from that decision is not important to the person making the decision. This ethical theory is not a consistent way of decision-making for the good of the group, because each person varies in their morals and motivations, which leads to a different decision being made for each separate individual. In many cases, what is best for one person is not going to benefit the group as a whole, but at the same time, if there is a group of people similar enough to each other, what is best for one person may be the best for the group, and therefore, the egoism ethical theory would be effective.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, Rachels from the elements of moral philosophy uses that “different cultures have different moral codes” (17). It is understood by…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Egoism is the ethical theory which states that all actions ought to be done either solely/ultimately for the sake of self interest. The criterion of rightness is what is morally right is what is good for the agent. The decision procedure would be that the agent must determine, in some way, what is good for him/her, and then do that. So, an act is right if and only if it brings the best consequences for an individual. Therefore, the action that is to be done is the action that is only to the self interest of the individual. Each individual determines what consequence is at their best interest. An individual may chose to act upon an action that is considered morally “wrong” but will still be considered right to do if it is in the individual’s self interest to do that action. Therefore, the rightness or wrongness of the action does not matter because the individual should only decide on the action that is in their self-interest.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each culture in this world has a diverse way of living ranging from how they prepare their own food, the way they do things in ordinary life, to many other different aspects of life. The culture of a particular person will influence the way they perceive (look at or understand) gender, ethnicity, religion, youth, age, cultural diversity, social class and work. With values, it’s basically what people can achieve through special skills. Although with assumptions, some people view things in a stereotypical way.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Egoisms

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical egoism is a normative theory which claims that all persons ought to act out of their own self-interest.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human beings put so much value on other people's interests. They find that if they satisfy their hunger for helping others, they (in turn) will have satisfaction for themselves. This was shown in Mother Teresa's giving to others without taking anything back. However, as with everything else, there are exceptions. I know many people (i.e. car salesman ha-ha) that have only their interests in mind when they are taking action. This brings us to the discussion of the difference between psychological egoism and ethical egoism and my position upon ethical egoism.…

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two types of egoism the first of which is psychological egoism. This is not a moral theory but is a view of the way in which a human being works therefore it is descriptive. The psychological egoist would argue that all human actions are motivated by self-interest. They argue that although it might seem we act in the interests of others (commit altruistic acts), underneath we have egoistic motives behind our acts. This is what Thomas Hobbes believed, that self-interest lay at the heart of all human motivation. Therefore the ethical egoist would support the claim that ethical judgments could be founded on self-interest alone. In fact they would believe that all ethical decisions can be founded on only self-interest. There is no could involved, all decisions are based on self-interest. For example the psychological egoist would say that we perform charitable acts because it stops us feeling pitiful towards others, in pitying we are imagining ourselves in that…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some Western cultures operate upon an individualistic rights-centered morality, while Eastern cultures favor a more community-centered ethic of virtue (Wong 1984). There is no universal ethic. In particular, it is recognized that the Western thinker Aristotle and his virtue ethic strongly resembles that of the Eastern thinker Confucius. This similarity suggests that a universal virtue ethic may already exist in the form of a powerful shared strand of moral thinking. When we adopt a virtue ethics perspective, we discover that East and West are always potentially meeting insofar as their virtues share a natural basis and structure. Since, for Aristotle, judgment rests with perception, and since perception is informed by experience, Aristotle, like Hume, sees experience as partly grounding our ethical judgments (Aristotle 1985, 1103a24-b23). Ethical relativists often get mesmerized by the details and fail to look for the overarching ethical good and/or virtue underpinning diverse human practices.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays