Preview

criminal law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
criminal law
Criminal Law Notes
Chapter 3-4:
Corpus Delicti: 1) Act/Omission & 2) Criminal Agency
Temporary Insanity does not apply in California. You must prove that you cannot understand right/wrong at the time of the act, and that you did not understand the nature/quality of the act. Must also prove insanity, otherwise you are considered sane.
People who cannot commit a crime (PC 26):
1) Children under 14
2) Idiots – Mental Incapacity
3) Ignorance or mistake of fact
4) Unconsciousness of Behavior
5) Accident or Misfortune
6) Threats, Duress, Coercion
7) Self Defense
8) Insanity
9) Entrapment
10) Necessity
Confession does not affect corpus delicti. However, a voluntary confession can be used to gather other information on the crime. Confession cannot be used alone to establish guilt.
Idiot evaluated by low IQ score of 10-24.
The 5 factors of criminal negligence are:
1) Defendant must have a legal duty, or contractual relationship, toward a person, group or society in general.
2) Defendant must know, or reasonably should know that he has a legal duty and that there is a present existing danger.
3) There must be an apparent ability upon the part of the defendant to perform the legally imposed duty.
4) It must be shown that the defendant failed to perform the duty that is legally imposed
5) It must appear that the defendants negligent act or omission was the cause of the injury sustained.
Entrapment: Police induce a person to commit a crime. The can, however, provide the opportunity to commit the crime.
Provocative act theory: If a defendant (accomplice) causes a provocative act that causes the death of one of his accomplices by the intended victim or police, he can be charged with murder.
Vicarious Liability theory: If two or more suspects agrees to kill someone, all of them can be charged with murder no matter who actually committed the act.
Felony murder rule: This rule states that if any defendant kills under PC 189 , all persons aiding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jacobsen vs Nike

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A duty to exercise care must exist - Such a duty arises when the law recognizes a relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff, and due to this relationship, the defendant is obligated to act in a certain manner toward the plaintiff2. The courts use the “reasonable foreseeability test” to determine if a relationship…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff, Pearsall, must prove that the promise had consideration, making the promise enforceable. Consideration has to have two key elements to satisfy the requirements. It has to have legal sufficiency, meaning it is something of value in the eye of the law, and there has to be a bargained-for exchange.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Farmer V Pilot

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    From the Pilot’s perspective, the potential applicable defense privileges that the courts provide to the Defense such that they are not held responsible for their act, are in the form of i) consent, ii) self defense, iii) defense of others (good samaritan) or iv) necessity. Though there are additional defense privileges available under the rule of law, the facts of this case lean towards exploring the said defenses.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An accomplice is often present or directly aids in the commission of the crime. The principle of accomplice liability is based on the notion that any individual who aids, abets, encourages, or assists another person to commit a crime should share in the criminal liability that accrues under law. “Criminal liability is the legal responsibility for a crime against the state, making the perpetrator subject to prosecution in a court of law and punishment (wiseGeek, 2003-2013).”…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Proof of the requisite knowledge in the mind of the defendant will in most cases present little difficulty. The fact that the risk of some damage would have been obvious to anyone in his right mind in the position of the defendant is not conclusive proof of the defendant 's knowledge, but it may well be and in many cases doubtless will be a matter which will drive the jury to the conclusion that the defendant himself must have appreciated the risk."…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    8. In a shootout with the armed guard during this a bank teller and police officer is shot.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (2) If the duty arises by implication, does it arise by implication in fact, implication in…

    • 9037 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An accomplice is a person who helps another to commit a crime, it is also known as “accessories”. These secondary parties participate in the commission of an offence and they will be liable if it was proved that they aided, abetted, counselled, or prosecuted. For example, A encourages D to hit V by a car and kill him, B brings the car to D, and C clears the road making sure no one is watching. If an accused was charged as an accessory they would be charged either with aiding, abetting, counseling or procuring and they are the four types of participating in a crime.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts 1 Outline

    • 6207 Words
    • 25 Pages

    -Harm is required for a tort & is about vindicating individual rights & redressing private harms…

    • 6207 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    alia that no reasonable cause of action was disclosed, because the duties to which he was…

    • 12566 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In ascertaining that person’s well-being, the court must, in particular, have such regard to the person’s wishes and…

    • 7513 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corpus Delecti

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The third degree of culpability is acting recklessly. Voluntary manslaughter is an example of acting recklessly. A reckless act lacks malice. The person had no intent to commit the act. If the actions of the accused leading up to the act had been different, then the act may not have happened. For example, if the person has several drinks containing alcohol and hits a small child with his vehicle and kills it, he would be considered to have been acting recklessly.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hedley Byrne Case

    • 807 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. The reliance must have been detrimental to the representee in the sense that damages resulted.…

    • 807 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal law notes MURDER

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act (or omission) of the defendant must have been the legal cause of the death of the victim. Causation must be established.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cyberlaw

    • 4296 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The onus will then shift to the defendant to prove any of the following three defences:…

    • 4296 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics