Preview

Courts in Today’s Pop Culture

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courts in Today’s Pop Culture
As Americans, we rely a great deal on the entertainment industry to educate us about things we don’t understand. In many ways, we live vicariously through the experiences of fictional characters and believe they learn many things from those fictional characters. For example, many people have said they learned about forensic techniques by watching the “C.S.I.” shows on television. They firmly believe that can assist in an actual criminal investigation because they have seen “experts” on television handle similar situations.

This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse, muddle or simply make-up to meet the needs of their fictional account. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, people often only have these fantastic accounts of the law to educate them to how it works “in the real world”. Consequently, the result is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that comprise our system. One of the main differences between fictional depictions of the court process and real thing is how a trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought forth to make statements. It is only rarely during these proceedings that anything exciting actually happens. But, if one were to believe the portrayal in movies and on television, it seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as “Sleepers” or “To Kill a Mockingbird”, make it seem as if shocking facts are revealed, surprise witnesses are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in every trial outcome. This simply

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Author Steven Johnson, of the article “Watching TV Makes You Smarter,” argues the evolution of modern television programming has intellectually challenged audiences, rather than stifling complex thoughts—and more, that audiences are craving a more cognitively demanding, complex plot line. Johnson uses multiple examples of drama type shows and even draws positive conclusions from many of the reality shows that are so popular now. He focuses in on a few key factors to take into account when considering the complexity and value of television—the “Sleeper Curve”, televised intelligence, and intentional viewer confusion.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specially, the unequal playing field legal actors and the accused are playing on when it comes to the truths about how they perceive, think and behave. As seen in previous chapters, money and race play a big role in the way individuals are tried, and these wealthy individuals are exploiting the weakness in our legal system. Adam Benforado suggest that this way, “If you are rich and connected, you go free. If you are poor and uneducated, you go to prison.” Will only add to the massive unfairness in our justice system. Accordingly, the use of trial consultants has also proved to be a negative for our justice system. Trial consultants collect information on the potential jury pool, discover any correlations that exist, and then target a sympathetic…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Casey Anthony Trial

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In some ways, the Casey Anthony trial reveals the way that media influence, including the way it is presented online, affects public perception. When one looks at the pages and information that pop up when one searched for information on the trial, a great deal of attention has been given to the way that certain commentators in the media, like Nancy Grace, tried to focus on the inconsistent and, most would say, deplorable behavior of Anthony and the tragedy of the death itself to draw ratings, but far fewer actually focused on the objective legal facts of the case. Thus, when someone sought to find out about the trial, whether through television outlets or online, quite often they were presented with a sensationalistic view of the case, rather than commentary that revealed the problems that the prosecution had with its case, like the lack of an established motive or cause of death, the very issues that prompted the jury to acquit. However, because these issues, or other very basic legal concepts like reasonable doubt, were not given their proper coverage during the trial, most people were outraged with the verdict and believed that the jury had been made of ignorant people, when in reality, their acquittal seems reasonable in a legal context.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For over a century, states have accepted that the adolescent esteem structure was a vehicle to ensure people all things considered by giving a framework that reacts to teenagers who are shaping into adulthood. States see that youngsters who execute encroachment are not precisely the same as grown-ups: as a class, they are less to blame, and they have a more indispensable limit as to change. To react to these capabilities, states have built up an other court framework for adolescents, and they have made a substitute, youth-based association transport structure that is not the same as that accommodated grown-ups.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many popular portrayals of criminal profiling. One such famous film is Silence of the Lambs, based on the popular novel by Thomas Harris. Recently many television shows as well; Millennium, Profiler, and The X-Files. These films, novels and television series have created false security; however, causing many to believe that criminal profiling is a “magical skill somewhat analogous to a precognitive psychic ability.”(Muller 2000)…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reality In T. V Court

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page

    So lets separate reality from fiction in T.V. court shows or movies. Its expected mas drama and suspense with lots of surprisingly events. In many cases, just like with federal and also in the state level, we don’t usually convict judges, but judges usually are stating, “Over Rule” to an objection or “Sustain.” There is a movie called “The Judge” with great actors from Robert Duval (Joseph Palmer) as the judge from Indiana and Robert Downey Jr. (Hank) is the son a defense attorney while Billy Bob Thornton (Dwight Dickham) is the prosecutor looking to prosecute “The Judge” for first-degree murder. In real life Judges, attorneys, victims and offenders all go through a stage or stages of stress. During the case of “The Judge” Hank is interrogating…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CSI Evidence

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The CSI Effect, “ which is most often refers to the belief that jurors have come to demand more forensic evidence in criminal trials, thereby raising the effective standard of proof for prosecutors. While this belief is widely held among American legal professionals, some studies have suggested that crime shows are unlikely to cause such an effect, although frequent CSI viewers may place a lower value on circumstantial evidence” ( Kim, Young S; Barak, Gregg; Shelton, Donald E 2009).…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Defense Analysis

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even the guilty have a right to a trial because it is the essence of the American criminal justice system (Dershowitz, 2013). Essentially, the text suggests, by way of actual court cases, that non-lawyers believe courtrooms are unequivocally fair and just, but when Dershowitz wins some of his cases, it is undeniable that a portion of his clients were actually guilty. Subsequently, Dershowitz’s ability to own up to his roles in guilty client cases demonstrates the defense attorney’s reality. Within his chosen court cases, Dershowitz (1983) is able to reveal the judicial system’s corruption and their ability to look the other way, when it suits them, in their inherent need to…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans have a fascination with crime and justice. Televisions in typical households tune in weekly to crime shows such as CSI Miami, Criminal Minds, and Law and Order, which commonly deal with fictional and non-fictional criminals and the treatment in the criminal justice system. Americans have a fascination with crime shows, figuring out the crime and waiting until the end in hopes to learn the identity of the criminal. Most important, Americans like to see justice carried out. The high-tech forensics of CSI Miami are interesting; however the the court history and purpose of upholding the law, protecting individuals, and resolving disputes is more interesting.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C.S.I - Myth vs. Reality

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime Scene Investigation is a series that followers investigators that use evidence to solve murders. The show is very popular due to its courageous matter and popular characters. However, despite CSI’s popularity it has been heavily criticized for realism to actual crime solving. CSI portrays an inaccurate, to say the least, image of how police solve crimes.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision Making" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA Online , retrieved July 27, 2010 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p125445_index.html…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are total of five federal offenses: crimes committed on high seas, federal property, and crossing a state or national border, Dereliction of Interstate Commerce, and harming a federal official while they are on duty. The Federal Courts are use for impeachment of a Public Official, disputes between two or more states, and Federal Courts have total jurisdiction over people filing bankruptcy in the U.S.. In my opinion, having total jurisdiction over people filing bankruptcy in the U.S. is most important role of Federal Courts. Many of people go to the Federal Courts to fight for their rights, and the Federal Courts has the ability to help them.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today there are too many murder victims whose lives are taken by criminals who have such little regard for our justice system, due to the leniency in punishment for these crimes. A prime example of this scenario is the criminal trial of People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson, also known as the O.J Simpson murder case. In this controversial trial professional football player O.J Simpson was accused of and tried for the murder of his wife Nicole. Simpson hired and spent millions of dollars on an elite defense team in which he hoped would acquit him of the charges he was clearly guilty of. After a year of investigating and reviewing evidence, Mr. Simpson was found not guilty for the murder of his wife Nicole Simpson. Women’s rights groups along with people across the United States were outraged. It is cases that are handled in a manner such as these and with such an inappropriate outcome that forces the public to become so frustrated with our legal system and government. State officials must realize that there is no way to justify the murder of another human being without an extreme punishment including the death of any person who commits that crime.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    That may be but what about when there is a celebrity on the trial. That why I’m writing this paper, when a celebrity is on the stand they are less likely to be convicted of crime; but on the other hand compared the average person, the average person would be convinced. A celebrity could commit the same crime as a normal person and receive less harsh punishment or none at all; while the normal person takes their punishment and does the time. So this will be about…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury System

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    American jurist seem to think that when they are called to have jury duty that it is going to be like all of those law shows they see on television, but that is never the case. According to Jennifer Dearborn, the writer of the web article “The case of Casey Anthon; Defending the American Jury System” from the Law Record, in the shows the person that has committed the crime is always found and put in jail, which is not always true in real life. This is known as the CSI affect. Another way that people can be wrong about the jury system trial process is that in a normal case, there wouldn’t be television cameras or microphones, the trial would happen and it would be done with. The problem with the Casey Anthony trial is that it was a “Show Trial”. According to the article “Should We Abolish the Jury System?” by Ben Shapiro, an American conservative political commentator, radio talk show host, attorney, and media consultant, wrote,…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics