Preview

Corporate Social Responsibility : Supply Chain to Value Chain

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Social Responsibility : Supply Chain to Value Chain
387

From supply chains to value chains: A spotlight on CSR
Malika Bhandarkar and Tarcisio Alvarez-Rivero* 1. Introduction
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)1 has become a hot topic in boardrooms across the world. Changes in corporate value systems are being driven by pressures from different actors, including governments, consumers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and institutional investors (diagram 1). Multinational corporations (MNCs) have operations spread across the globe, relying on both foreign affiliates and arm’s-length suppliers arrayed along global supply chains, many of which encompass developing countries. What then does the growing CSR movement mean for developing country producers? The chapter addresses this question.

Diagram 1
Institutional Investor
Tier I Tier II Tie r III

NonGovernmental Organization Multinational Corporation Consumer Supply Chain, consisting of:

Government

CSR has relevance to many facets of a corporation’s operations. Strong CSR policies can help to recruit the right people for the job, keep attrition rates low by promoting a “feel good” quotient, improve corporate image, prepare for future regulation, empower “soft” laws (Vogel, 2005, p.162), appease green customers, and convince institutional investors that the corporation is following sustainable practices that positively impact the bottom line.
* Policy Integration and Analysis Branch, Division for Sustainable Development, UNDESA, United Nations, New York. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily coincide with those of the organization to which they are affiliated.

388

Industrial Development for the 21st Century

Managers are being asked to raise profits but in more socially and environmentally responsible ways. The bottom line continues to be the baseline for measuring corporate success. CSR activities must be seen as providing a measure of shareholder value (e.g., reputation, goodwill) which



Bibliography: Andersen, M. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains: Understanding the uniqueness of firm behaviour, Copenhagen Business School PhD Series 15, Copenhagen. Boulstridge, E. and M. Carrigan (2000), Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap, Journal of Communication Management, 4 (6), 421-433. Capron, M. and F.Quairel-Lanoizelee, (2004), Mythes et réalités de l’entreprise responsable, Ed. La Découverte. Carrigan, M. and A. Attalla (2001), The Myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in consumer behaviour?, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 560576. The Environmental Agency of England and Wales (2004), An Alternative Business Plan, Engaged Investor, November/December. 410 Industrial Development for the 21st Century Deutsch, C. H. (2006), Companies and Critics Try Collaboration, New York Times, 17 May. The Economist (20 January 2005), A Survey of Corporate Social Responsibility. Hartman, C. L., and E. R. Stafford (2006), Chilling with Greenpeace from the Inside Out, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer. The IKEA Group (2005), IKEA Facts and Figures 2003-2004. The IKEA Group (2002), IWAY – The IKEA Way on Purchasing Home Furnishing Products. International Labor Organization (2002), Second Synthesis Report on the Working Conditions Situation in Cambodia 's Garment Sector. Jorgensen, A. L., and J. Steen Knudsen (2006), Sustainable competitiveness in global value chains- How do Small Danish Firms Behave?, The Copenhagen Centre for Corporate Responsibility. Jørgensen, H. Bank, P. M. Pruzan-Jørgensen (PricewaterhouseCoopers, Denmark), M. Jungk (Danish Institute for Human Rights), and A. Cramer, (Business for Social Responsibility) (2003), Strengthening Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains, Corporate Social Responsibility Practice, World Bank Group. KPMG (2005), International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Kramer, M. and J. Kania (2006), A New Role for Non-Profits, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring. Kramer, M., M. Pfitzer, and P. Lee (2005), Competitive Social Responsibility: Uncovering the Economic Rationale for Corporate Social Responsibility among Danish Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Foundation Strategy Group and Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Makower, J., J. Elkington and J. Hailes (1991), The Green Consumer Guide, Penguin Publisher (USA). Mallaby, S. (2006), A New Brand of Power, The Washington Post (7 August). Nesbitt, S. L. (2001), The "CalPERS Effect" on Targeted Company Share Prices, Wilshire Associates, January. O’Sullivan, M.(2000), Corporate Governance and Globalization, Annals, AAPSS, 570. Observatoire sur le Responsabilité Sociétale des Entreprises (ORSE) (September 2003), Very Large Enterprises and their support for SMEs in the context of sustainable development, Exploiting CSR best practice within the framework of relations between customers and suppliers. OECD (2003), The Environmental Performance of Public Procurement: Issues of Policy Coherence. Oxfam GB (2004), Clean Clothes Campaign, and Global Unions, Play Fair at the Olympics, March. Palmisano, S. J. (2006), The Globally Integrated Enterprise, Foreign Affairs, 85 (3), May/June. From supply chains to value chains 411 Pande, A., R. Raman and V. Srivatsan (2006), Recapturing your Supply Chain Data, McKinsey Quarterly, March. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer (2002), The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy, Harvard Business Review, December. Ruggie, J. G. (2004), Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, actors and practices, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Harvard University. Salamon, L. M., H. K. Anheier, R. List, S. Toepler, S. W. Sokolowski, and associates (1999), Global Civil Society, Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies. Sikkink, K. and J. Smith (2002), Infrastructure for Change: Transnational Organizations, 1953-93, University of Minnesota Press. Social Investment Forum (2005), Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States; http://www.socialinvest.org Tallontire, A. and P. Greenhalgh (2005), Establishing CSR Drivers in Agribusiness, International Finance Corporation, August. UNCTAD (2001), Promoting linkages, World Investment Report 2001. Vogel, D. (2005), The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits, Brookings Institution Press. Waterman, P. (1998), Globalization, social movements, and the new internationalism, London: Mansell. Willard, B. (2002), The Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line, New Society Publishers. World Bank (2004a), Public Sector Support for the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains: Conclusions from Practical Experience, study prepared for the Foreign Investment Advisory Service Investment Climate Department, World Bank, by Business for Social Responsibility and PricewaterhouseCoopers (Denmark), December. World Bank Group (2004b), Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, Seizing the Global Opportunity: Investment Climate Assessment and Reform Strategy for Cambodia, June.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s modern business world, commerce implements operation, drive and manner notions with endorsement and adoption of corporate social responsibility as a matter of course (David Henderson 2004). The stakeholder groups, for instance, governments, communities, suppliers, employees, customers and stockholders persistently claim administrators to dedicate capitals to corporate social responsibility (McWilliams and Siegel 2001, 117). Despite the fact, strategic corporate social responsibility is far more selective on being a standing corporation rate citizen and also addressing the social issues that the corporate creates (Micheal E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer 2006).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In global markets, modern corporates have significant power to exercise a positive influence in the countries, where they buy goods and services from global suppliers in bulk. Recognising this influence is the first step to understand the contribution of the modern corporates in developing countries’ economies and in turn their self-benefit. As being giant firms at one end of the buying chain with the cost reduction advantage, they shouldn 't be reluctant of getting involved and operate with the suppliers to improve working conditions and comply with the ethical trading regulations. Business Corporations should also think and take responsibility for the environment around them. Taking this responsibility is the first step to recognize Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social responsibility is when a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law and ethical standards. It is a process with the aim to embrace responsibility for the company 's actions and encourage a positive impact through its activities on the environment, consumers, employees, communities, stakeholders and all other members of the public sphere. The concept of CSR is well explained by Gordan Brown, Chancellor of Exchequer, that in this era Corporate Social Responsibility goes far beyond the old trend of the past (donating money to a good cause at the end of the year) And is now an all year round responsibility the companies accept for the environment around them. To provide best working practices, the engagement in local communities and for their recognition that brand name does not only depend on quality, price and uniqueness but how they interact with companies’ workforce, community and the environment.…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Norman Bowie. “New directions in corporate social responsibility - moral pluralism and reciprocity”. Business Horizons. July-August 1991, 28 Feb 2008.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics Outline

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crane, A; Matten, D; & Spence, L; (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stockholder vs Stakeholder

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages

    * Visser, Wayne, Dirk Matten, Manfred Pohl, and Nick Tolhurst (Editors) (2007). The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility. London, England; New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-72395-1.…

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coca Cola Ethics Issues

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A difficult question is for each company is how to operationalize this concept within its organisation. The introduction of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has given stakeholders leverage in decision-making, and as…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As globalization continues, the earth 's natural processes transform local problems into international issues along with the development of international commercial activities. Few communities are being left untouched by major environmental issues and social problems. As one of the most active and influential elements of the human society, the business world has been required, for several decades, to shoulder more responsibility by their consumers and society in general. The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) draws more and more attention from all sectors of society, and is considered as an issue that we cannot afford to ignore.…

    • 5717 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Findings – Findings show an example of good practice in the area of corporate social responsibility in the supply chain and illustrate the substantive progress that can be made in achieving supply chain responsibility. At the same time, the paper provides the specific challenges in developing from a corporate social watchdog approach to one in which the power in the chain is more balanced and where a holistic approach requires to be taken to achieve social responsibility.…

    • 9776 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory: There are five dimensions of corporate social responsibility: physical environment, social (community), consumer, supply chain, and employee relation. ‘Corporate social responsibility is encompasses not only what company do with their profits but also how they make them. It goes beyond philanthropy and compliance and addresses how companies manage their economic, social, and environmental impacts, as well as their relationships in all key spheres of influence: the workplace, the marketplace, the supply chain, the community, and the public policy realm. ’(HARVARD Kennedy School, 2008)…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A fundamental problem in the field of business and society has been that there are no definitions of corporate social performance (CSP), corporate social responsibility (CSR1), or corporate social responsiveness (CSR2) that provide a framework or model for the systematic collection, organization, and analysis of corporate data relating to these important concepts. No theory has yet been developed that can provide such a framework or model, nor is there any general agreement about the meaning of these terms from an operational or a managerial viewpoint. Wood 's (1991) concern that the "definition of corporate social performance (CSP) is not entirely satisfactory" is shared by many scholars and managers. CSP, together with CSR1 and CSR2, carry no clear meaning and remain elusive constructs. They have defied definition for reasons that are set forth in the second section.…

    • 10195 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The modern base of globalisation and ethical behaviour has considerably changed the basic philosophy of Corporate Social Responsibility of any organisation or company. Companies are awakened to be socially responsible for their profit maximisation. Most large Multi National companies feel extensive pressure from consumers, employees, suppliers, community groups, government, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), and institutional shareholders (these groups are collectively known as stake holders of a company) to engage in being socially responsible (Morrison Paul, Catherine J. and Siegel, Donald S., 2006). In recent years, scholars in the field of several business administrations have studied the implication of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on economical and communal performance of an organisation or a company.…

    • 4599 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Despite the long history of CSR, applications of CSR (and sustainability) concepts to supply chains have started to emerge in the last years. Sustainable ‘Supply Chain Management’ is defined as the management of supply chains where all the three dimensions of sustainability namely the economic, the environmental, and the social ones, are taken into account. When sustainable Supply Chain Management principles are adopted, companies are held responsible for the social and environmental impacts arising along the supply chain. They are also demanded to integrate ecological and social aspects into the decisions and actions which involve the supply chains they belong to. Moreover, when supply chain relationships include developing countries, companies are asked to take responsibility for the well-being and performance of small up-stream producers working in those countries. An increased pressure by stakeholders, mainly consumers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), is placed upon companies specifically to develop management systems across the supply chain. Such systems can also be used to transfer socially responsible behaviours along the supply chain. This stands especially in developing countries, where the countervailing powers of governments and civil society are weak and poverty prevails .To transfer supply chain partners socially responsible behaviours, companies can establish written supplier requirements ,guidelines and requirements where in-social and environmental performance suppliers are asked to pursue are reported; monitor supplier performance, to verify their compliance with the written requirements contribute to suppliers awareness building and training on CSR issues .…

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dordevic, D. (2008). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Contemporary Business. Megatrend Review, vol.5 , 151 - 165.…

    • 6059 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The present-day conception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) implies that companies voluntarily integrate social and environmental concerns in their operations and interaction with stakeholders. The European Commission defines it as “a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and a cleaner environment.” (European Commission, 2001, p. 5) It is related to complex issues such as environmental protection, human resources management, health and safety at work, relations with local communities, relations with suppliers and consumers. The notion of CSR is one of ethical and moral issues surrounding corporate decision making and behaviour. Knowing if a company should undertake certain activities or refrain from doing so because they are beneficial or harmful to society is a central question. Social issues deserve moral consideration of their own and should lead managers to consider the social impacts of corporate activities in decision making. Regardless of any stakeholders’ pressures, actions which lead to things such as the conservation of the Earth’s natural resources or bio-diversity preservation, are morally praiseworthy. However, some argue that the contribution of concepts such as CSR is just a reminder that the search for profit should be constrained by social considerations (Valor, 2005, p. 199). Increasingly CSR is analysed as a source of competitive advantage and not as an end in itself (Branco and Rodrigues, 2006). In effect, the concept of CSR has evolved from being regarded as detrimental to a company’s profitability, to being considered as somehow benefiting the company as a whole, at least in the long run (see, for example, Hess et al., 2002; Porter and Kramer, 2002; Smith, 2003).…

    • 11526 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    amount of valid data, the difficult settings in which the research has to be done and the…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays