Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar V. Good Night and Good Luck

Good Essays
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar V. Good Night and Good Luck
Explore how Julius Caesar and ONE other related text of your own choosing represent conflicting perspectives in unique and evocative ways.

All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values, meaning every composer has a purpose fueled by issues from their context and audience. Conflicting perspectives are used as a vehicle for successfully conveying this purpose to the audience. Through the representation of events, personalities and situations, the responder is susceptible to accept the perspective that the composer has deemed valid or credible. William Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar is a typical example of a play that was created by a composer that imparts their values to the audience through the use of conflicting perspectives. Also, George Clooney’s 2005 film, Good Night and Good Luck explores the representation of conflicting perspectives towards Communists that reflected the distraught norms of society in 1950’s America.

In both Julius Caesar and Good Night and Good Luck, the composers use personalities of certain characters to express conflicting perspectives. These personalities may be representative the leaders in the society at the time or even the society at large. An important conflict of personalities to be considered in Julius Caesar is Cassius and Brutus’. Cassius is believed to be the main conspirator in charge of killing Caesar and in order to successfully do so, he persuades Brutus to be involved. Cassius’ manipulative personality is demonstrated when he discusses with Brutus that people can manifest their own destiny. “Men at some times are masters of their fates: the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves, that we are underlings.” Shakespeare uses the Roman Republic as a platform to comment on Elizabethan society. Superstition was a very serious topic in that era and people genuinely believed their fate was in the hands of the Gods. Cassius’ argument to Brutus disregards this concept and as a result a conflicting perspective is obtained and considered by the audience. During this, Brutus is concerned with his honour and his determined state of mind will make him do almost anything to stay noble. Similarly in Good Night and Good Luck, there are many personalities that oppose each other in the film. The scene where Clooney’s character, Fred Friendly is in a meeting with two air force authorities that want to approve a story of one CBS is running “that says that the U.S. Air Force tried Milo Radulovich without any evidence and found him guilty of being a security risk.” The colonel warns Friendly that the unmerited story may cause controversy with the relationship between the air-force and CBS news. Friendly’s has a stubborn view of justice and has every intention to run the story anyway which demonstrates conflict between media and what they’re reporting. This is reflected into society with constant media debates that attempt to distinguish a reasonable boundary for media. The conflictive perspectives of the soldiers and Friendly, cause tension through the still camera close up shots throughout the scene. There are also many jump-cuts between the two sides of the table which express the aggression of both sides and how dedicated they are to their work and opinion.

Events are used in texts to represent separate morals and values between the characters and the audience. Mark Antony’s funeral speech dedicated to Caesar to the plebeians was cleverly written by Shakespeare to cause conflict between the Roman society and the conspirators that assassinated Caesar. In the speech, Antony points out the humane qualities of Caesar which is a pleasant contrast to the conquerer filled with greed and haste that Caesar is portrayed as before this event. Throughout Antony’s address to the people, the lines “But Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honourable man.” repeated three times. The use of repetition conveys that honour was an extremely important characteristic to own, which is a recurring motif throughout the play. The quote has a sarcastic tone, as it explains that Caesar must have been ambitious because an honourable man has stated it. However, Antony continues to reveal the goodness of Caesar and why Rome needed him as a leader. “I thrice present him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” It is Shakespeare’s perspective that the ambitious nature of dictatorship is not a suitable form of government for Elizabethan England. He expresses this in the quote with the rhetorical question in which he directly addresses the audience. Antony tries to convince the crowd that Caesar did not fight to become a dictator. He cared for the people he ruled over and his power strengthened as did his support.

Composers put their characters in a range of situations which becomes a source of debate for what society would do in particular situations. This may cause conflict in the different perspectives of people’s choices and decisions in certain situations. In Good Night and Good Luck, Clooney has executed this concept through the character of Edward Murrow. Murrow is put into many serious situations that threaten his own life and the attitudes of the society during the set era. One example is when Murrow is given the opportunity to write part of his own show which targets Senator McCarthy. The context behind this is that during the 1950s, the threat of communism was overwhelming and most media groups were strict in their delivery of the news out of fear that they would be targeted otherwise. Murrow however is not afraid to point out how McCarthy, an anti-communist leader, has stepped over the line of “investigating and persecuting” repeatedly. Murrow was in a tight situation that, if failed, could ruin his career and furthermore, the company he works for CBS. However, from the perspective of McCarthy, Murrow was assisting the Communists and therefore wanted him put off air immediately. As Murrow is a television broadcaster, the whole of society to would witness this situation and either agree with Murrow or McCarthy. “And whose fault is that? Not really his, he didn't create this situation of fear, he merely exploited it, and rather successfully.” During the speaking of this line, the camera zooms in on Murrow as he keeps a sustained eye contact. This makes the audience focus in an pay attention to the speaker as he is saying the words so intently and with a strong conviction.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cassius's perspective is very much that Caesar is a mere man and no better than any other Roman. 'I was born as free as Caesar, so were you.' His recollection of the time he saved Caesar from drowning had a great influence on his view on Caesar, “Tis true, this god did shake.” He ironically utilizes the term ‘god’ as he was astonished that a man of such physical weakness can now have the reputation of greatness, “'Ye gods, it doth amaze me / A man of such a feeble temper should / So get the start of the majestic world.” Cassius’ soliloquy exposes his deceit and manipulation, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see Thy honourable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed.” His play on words showing his belief that he will be able to manipulate Brutus; honourable “mettle,” as if it were heated metal being changed into something new and finally target Caesar with his own loved companion. There is an element of personal jealousy in Cassius. It is evident in his metaphorical language:, 'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world / Like a Colossus and we petty men' His simile of ‘Colossus’ also produces imagery of the flawed Caesar. Cassius represents Caesar as a tyrant. Cassius takes it personally and will act on the matter. Therefore, through a variety of literary techniques, embedded in various character convictions and opposing views, Shakespeare is able to blur…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflicting perspectives exist within texts and their representation is affected by the context of the composer.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar presents conflicting perspectives of Julius Caesar’s death. Shakespeare employs a variety of dramatic and language techniques to enhance the contrasting views of the assassination. Similarly President Bush’s Address at the 5th Anniversary of 9/11 and the article War is not a solution for Terrorism by Howard Zinn, deals with differing views of US occupation in Iraq.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What big ideas from Julius Caesar interest you? Let’s find out by working through these directions. Look up words as needed.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice," proclaimed William Jennings Bryan. Many people believe in destiny and fate and a set-in-stone, unbreakable path for their lives. Caesar's ego warps and distorts his interpretation of various superstitions in Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar. Although he believes in superstition and the supernatural, he selectively chooses his interpretation. Be it a dream, fortune-telling, or a common superstition, it always benefits Caesar, or it just isn't true. Caesar's distorted sense of self-superiority ultimately leads to his assassination. If he had listened to some of the ‘signs of the gods,' his tragic fate may have been avoided.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus was an honorable man, as many have said. High in power, he always spoke the truth to the people of Rome, saying he would kill himself for the good of it. He was Caesar's right-hand man and did what he thought was right. In this play he was tricked by He was tricked by Cassius and believed the only way to stop his rule was to kill him. In the play, Brutus was an honorable man, but trusted almost everyone. Still, Brutus killed himself believing his choice was right one. In Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Brutus was seen as the tragic hero of the play.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a play about loyalty, betrayal, love, and deception. There are many characters with fairly in-depth personalities. Some of the main characters are Cassius, the crafty, deceptive, witty man who is the leader of the conspiracy that killed Caesar. Brutus, the noble, honest, honorable man who is one of the key members of the conspiracy. There is also Antony, who is Caesar's right hand man. He is shrewd and ruthless man, willing to do anything to get revenge for Caesar's death.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals have diverse personality traits: deceitfulness or virtuousness, arrogance or charity. Sometimes, these traits highlight the traits of the other and affect one’s decision-making and interpretations. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Cassius are both noble Romans that planned a conspiracy against Caesar, but they executed it for different reasons. In the story, Cassius is contracted with Brutus because of their distinct characteristics; he also led Brutus to become the tragic hero, and their interactions develop the theme of the play.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Composition

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Has someone close to you, a best friend, or a wingman ever betrayed you? That is what the play “Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare is all about. In the play Julius Caesar is the new ruler of Rome. Cassius, who is conspirator, does not want him to be ruler. So Cassius skillfully convinces Brutus that he would be a better ruler of Rome than Caesar. Cassius convinces Brutus by telling stories about Caesars personality flaws that make him a weak ruler and Brutus a better one.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person’s personality is what characterizes them. It expresses who you are and how you carry yourself. Edwin van Thiel states that,”A personality is something that you always take with you, it affects your thinking, feelings and behavior, where and with whom you are, in any situation at any time”. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Cassius are two characters that stand out. In several ways they are similar to or different from each other.These ways are presented in both their actions and words. The likeness and disparity in their morals, motivation, and decisions show. In William Shakespeare’s book, Brutus and Cassius and have two different personalities, and it is shown throughout the book.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays