Preview

Confederation Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confederation Dbq Analysis
Before we can rationally answer this question, we must realize the meaning of the word confederation. A confederation is a loosely headed form of government. It is the opposite of the word union. The Articles of Confederation was a weak government, but it was purposely intended to be that way. The last thing the3 government wanted was to formulate a strict government. This probably would have caused the reasons for fighting the American Revolution to resurface. The Letter from the Rhode Island Assembly to Congress on November 30, 1782 was just one of the several statements disapproving of the Confederation. Document A is saying that the U.S. government is stripping the liberties of the states. Spending the money from the states and spending it on things the …show more content…
He had yet to see the failures of the Articles. He was blinded with overconfidence in the U.S. John Jay’s letter to George Washington is the pivotal document in this series. For the first time Jay realizes that the U.S. may need to make some changes in order to keep the U.S. afloat.(1786) Jay says he can feel the apprehensiveness of the American people re-occurring again. Rawlin Lowndes’ speech to the South Carolina House of Representatives debating the adoption of the Federal constitution on January 17, 17888 was a plea to save the Confederation. He wanted to add to it, not destroy it. Unfortunately, Lowndes did not change the mind of most Americans. The Articles of Confederation was not an effective government, but rather, a workable one. We must understand that whenever a government is set up so loosely with no able guidelines, problems are bound to occur. The Articles of Confederation was more a “club” than a government. Anyone could leave whenever they so desired. Unfortunately the government did not work, but ironically, the leaders of our country purposely formulated this weak government out of fear of the past. This was an unavoidable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "From 1781 to 1789 the articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government". I disagree with this quote because the articles was to weak to keep the nation unified which made the article a failure. The Articles were set up intentionally to be weak because of the memory of a strong central government of the British. The articles were to weak to govern effectively so it did not have the ability to carry out designs with out controversy from other states. This caused major problems later down the road for America. The Articles did had some good points to it like the Land Ordinance of 1785 but it was ultimately a failure due to financial, foreign, and domestic problem the Articles had made.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1643, there were four New England colonies who formed a confederation and they came up with the Articles of Confederation. In 1697, William Penn brought forth a plan of union which never was implemented. Last but not least in 1754, Benjamin Franklin came up with the Albany Plan of Union. “The history of colonial efforts to cooperate or unite demonstrates that the colonies had no strong or sustainable need for a common government.” All of those plans never went into effect but that doesn't mean that they didn't want to unite. In the following paragraphs I'm going to state why I think this statement is wrong by using documents A, B, and C.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc A) A letter from the Rhode Island Assembly was sent to Congress stating the fact that states cannot tax. Under the Articles of Confederation state taxes could not be impressed, which forced them into economic failure. It also allowed Congress to collect from any state without a limit to time and the amount taken; this would allow Congress to become independent. Under the Articles of the Confederation Congress was allowed the power to choose which states they were to obtain money. Congress decided to obtain this money from the states, the ones that were commercially inclined. This act severely affected the commerce of Rhode Island and other states. The Articles of Confederation only proved to be a terrible idea among most states and the country. In 1770, the United States had the smallest population and income. In 1775, right before the Articles of the Confederation with a small population brought in the most income over a period of twenty years. Since the Articles of Confederation the population would still be increasing and the revenue would became pretty stable. However, in time the limited income under the Articles of Confederation would not be able to suite the growing population. Soon after the government would not be able to pay off debt and would not be able to tend the states needs which effected the people. Soon under the Articles of Confederation the government would become broke. . (Doc B), Shows…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government;” a bold statement considering the fact that the Articles lasted only 8 years. Although, I suppose the case could be made that the Articles of Confederation provided the means for a temporary government, only acting as a first-time attempt for the colonies in creating a more perfect representation for the colonies as a whole. This is true in some ways and in some ways it’s not; for instance, just the fact that the Articles lacked the necessary provisions for a sufficiently effective government. There was no president or executive agencies or judiciary, nor was there a tax base…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Union is power. Work in unity is better than working individually. That is why the British North Americans thought of confederation. An individual or single power will most likely have a hard time fighting against a group of people with lots of power. The colonies wanted to join together so that they could fight against the United States. If the groups of colonies didn’t join together, they wouldn’t have the power to prevent the United States from controlling all of North America. There is also other reasons for why the Confederation of 1867 happened, like the ending of BNA’s trade relations with Britian and the U.S., the Fenian Raids, Political deadlock, and the impact of “Manufast Destiny” as the main cause of Confederation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a significant stepping stone toward the Constitution. They were filled with weaknesses which resulted in protests like Shay’s Rebellion. But according to John Jay, “A state of fluctuation and uncertainty must disgust and alarm such men, and prepare their minds for almost any change that may promise them quiet and security”, (Doc. G). The Articles did not provide Congress with much authority, and Joseph Jones noted how slow and unable Congress was to make payments and decisions (Doc. C). These things would eventually direct the leaders of the United States to go back to the table and develop a better and more efficient document to lead the…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1985 Dbq

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The colonists were living in a brand new country that had no track record. Considering that the articles of confederation had no precedent to follow, and no other government to imitate; the articles were fairly good. However, the Articles of Confederation could have been more effective than they were. Effective does not necessarily mean that the government was strong. It does mean that the government was able to provide the people with the kind of government they wanted and needed. Also, ineffective does not necessarily mean weak. The Articles were deliberately written for a weak central government, the colonists set it up they way they wanted to. Despite the fact that they one the revolutionary war, and they now realized that they were able to work together, they feared that a central government would cause each state to loose the civil rights which they have already gained. Therefore, the colonists deliberately made a weak central government. However, the kind of government which the people set up, through their own will created much uncertainty. The industrious people preferred security and quite and the government held too much uncertainty for them. If there is too much uncertainty, then they will agree to anything that will give them the security that they want. (Document G)…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation, from 1781-1789, had a higher purpose of attempting to create a stabilized government, while limiting its power, the overall effectiveness of this plan is not up to the standards as needed by the newly formed nation of America, and thus the government broke down by around 1786.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The confederation style of government had many weaknesses in domestic affairs. After the states won their independence they had to set up a government, and of course they didn't want it to be anything like the British so the central government was severely lacking in power. The Articles of Confederation gave sovereign power to each of the states to rule themselves, which isn't terrible considering they were under despotic rule of the king all this time, but they couldn't agree on anything. Under the Articles of Confederation the Congress had no power to levy taxes or tariffs, which led to a shortage of money. The only way it could gain funds was to ask the states for money even though most of those requests were ignored or only partially met. Speaking of money, the congress did have the right to print its own currency, but so did the states. In the states in which the creditor classes controlled the legislatures, high taxes and a tight money system made it impossible for debtors to repay their debts but in the states where debtors did have a heavy influence over the legislatures, the amount of paper money became excessive, which led to high inflation.…

    • 579 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a creation of a frail central government, there was no federal court system under the Articles. Most of the power went to the state governments because there were fears of recreating a British Monarchy like government. This made it so the Congress could not enforce the laws or levy taxs; this was one of the major weaknesses under the Articles, along with the lack of power to regulate the trade between states, and with foreign nations. Most of the military power was in the hands of the state militias, as the Congress could not force any state to meet its alloted quota for troops or for the armaments and equipment needed to support a Federal Army. This was…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress and they functioned as America’s first constitution in the year 1777. However, with progressive changes, ratifications were made to the Articles of Confederation by the beginning of March 1781 (Schultz 112). It is important to highlight the reasons as to why the Articles of Confederation were important to the American population and the American government at the time. This will help to understand why the constitution failed, and areas where it benefited the country. Ultimately, an understanding of the Articles of Confederation based on how they were implemented will help to effectively understand the development of America as it is known today, with the current constitution and a deferral government.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whoever said that the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government was completely incorrect. The United States were not united under this government. The United States could not stand up for itself against other countries. Also, the United States were not stable economically under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation did not provide a good government for America.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation gave the states the right to govern themselves, all laws were made by states, all taxes went to states, etc. This would keep the states from reaching a point of representation and unity. While the US did have a central government, most of the control was in the state government, and most of the states did not have much representation in the central government. The states regardless of size, had only 1 vote in the central government. To sum up, the Articles were a disaster for representative-hungry…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays