Preview

Comparing James Madison's Letter To The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing James Madison's Letter To The Constitution
Twelve years after declaring independence, the American people were struggling to articulate their vision for government. They were acutely aware of the shortcomings of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation, yet they still felt strongly that the individual states maintain their power. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan in 1787, with a goal of stabilizing the budding nation by according more authority to a central government than before. These resolutions would ultimately become a new Constitution. It was in January 1788, after five states had ratified but eight were still skeptical, that Madison penned a letter to the Independent Journal, wherein he detailed his rationale for the larger federal government. …show more content…
He envisioned a system where the powers of the federal government were “few and defined,” and acting mostly upon external affairs and foreign relations. Thus, the federal government would be most active in times of war; however, if it did its job well and kept war to a minimum, “the less frequent [would] be those scenes of danger” where it would have greater authority. The states, on the other hand, would possess more power during peacetime, as they would be more concerned with “numerous and indefinite” tasks, among them the “ordinary course of affairs concern[ing] the lives, liberties, and properties of the people.” Again reflecting John Locke, Madison reminded the people that the new government was indeed formed around the best interests of the people. Madison went on to describe the two new powers accorded to the federal government, namely, the powers to regulate commerce and impose taxes. The former, he asserted, everyone was in agreement on; the latter was also necessary. In order to achieve its purpose of controlling foreign affairs, taxation would be required. Madison’s careful treatment of taxation was likely an attempt to encourage Massachusetts, which was very skeptical of taxes, to ratify the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan stood on the claim of expanding national power over the states and to have representation to states based on their amount of population. One of the delegates whom were for a stronger national government had mentioned the new country was ready for tyranny. I believe that the thought of having a country under tyranny is dangerous and feeding the national government too much power, especially since the states have already suffered under the harsh rule of tyrant leader, King George III.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of Federalism in the United States was a gradual event that had definitions of federal government being given in federalist 46 and 28 which gave definitions of a federalist government to the United States. As stated by James Madison one of the architects of the federal kind of government, “the state and national governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." The purpose of such a kind of government was to protect the rights of the people in all its earnestness.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    UNIT III APUSH STUDY GUIDE

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Virginia delegate James Madison's plan of government, in which states got a number of representatives in Congress based on their population…

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his idea that the United States is too large to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created in order to unite a new country. Also, when passing the Embargo Act, Jefferson demonstrates the federal power over the people, which goes against his Republican belief of allowing the states to have more power. As Madison prepares for his term in office, the citizens of the United States were most likely expecting him to be more open to suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, during a speech by Daniel Webster, a Federalist speaking on behalf of the entire Federalist Party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as his party would have preferred him to be. Both Madison and Jefferson are guilty of frequently going against the general ideas of their parties in order to meet their needs at a certain time.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is the Virginia Plan, also called the Large State Plan, which advised that the representation in a bicameral legislature be proportional to property or population. The other is the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states regardless to population in a unicameral legislature. Had the Virginia Plan been adopted entirely, large states would always have a dominant voice over the smaller states. On the other hand, if the New Jersey plan had been adopted entirely, bigger states with bigger needs would never prevail. When the delegates began to discuss this issue, they willingly agreed that a bicameral legislature is necessary for the new national government. They differed widely, however, in the representation of the two houses. Bitter debates followed until, finally, the compromise of equal representation in the House and proportional representation in the Senate was reached. In Henry Steele Commager 's article, "The Constitution, Was It an Economic Document?", he remarked that the framers "feared the powers of the majority, as they feared all power unless controlled" (141); the compromise of the representation of the houses underscores exactly this point because it prevents an absolute body majority which would prove to be fatal to the country had they had a malevolent intent. Furthermore, the compromise effectively appealed to all states and therefore…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the spring of 1812, Madison believe that war with Britain would be inevitable. For five years, the United States had tried to stay neutral and to not get militarily involved with Britain or France. On June 1, 1812, Madison asked Congress to declare war. This was called "Mr. Madison's War." A Republican view was to stay out of foreign wars and they also didn't believe in large armies of navies. Madison went from this peaceful Republican view to a more Federalist view. He wanted to be at war with Britain and to settle the disputes militarily and not peacefully. Madison had accepted the necessity of a Hamiltonian national bank, an effective taxation system based on tariffs, a standing professional army and a strong navy. Those are all Federalist views that Madison accepted. He abandoned his Republican views because he believed the Federalist ideas were better for the United…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison, the Father of the Constitution himself, divulged the Virginia Plan. He wanted to have a two house legislature. He also wanted the president to be elected by Congress. This plan favored bigger states because they would, according to their population, get more representation in the government.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his famous Federalist 10 paper by stating that a strong argument in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it creates a government in control of the chaos, violence, and destruction caused by the factions in society. James Madison defines a faction as group of people who collectively work together to protect and promote their own economic interests and political opinions. In my opinion, these factions are inevitable, and this because of human nature and attraction theory. When people hold certain ideologies, possess specific amounts of wealth, and possess different amounts of property, they will most likely associate themselves with people who are most similar to them. Factions in society are completely opposite and…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Virginia Plan was written by James Madison, but presented by Edmund Randolph. This Plan was presented to the Constitutional Congress on May 29, 1787. The Virginia Plan proposed the three branches in America. The legislative, judicial, and executive branch. The role of this document is very important and strong. It was the first document to produce a separation of powers in different branches. The Virginia Plan when through more than one revision before it was finally done. There were two houses throughout this plan. The House and the Senate. One of them with members elected from…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why was James Madison called the “Father of the constitution”? And who is he? Here are some facts I have listed about what him and the name he is known as.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “One of the most brilliant men in the history of the United States”. That is how James Madison is described in this video. One of the most influential founding fathers was born March 1751 in Port Conway, Virginia. Although he was weak from illness most of his life, he didn’t let it stop him. He was extremely intelligent and loved reading and writing. James eventually went on to present day Princeton University where he studied numerous subjects including history. After college, he returned home where he had a large interest in the rebellion against Britain. In 1779 Madison was elected into the Continental Congress. The Articles of Confederation were failing and James knew it. He began working hard studying the articles and devising plans to revise them to give the young nation a strong form of government. At the convention he took detailed notes and debated almost every issue.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays