Compare the Neo-Freudian Theories of Personality to Freudian Psychoanalysis
Personality Studies
PSY 8100 Theories of Personality
The hypothesis that personality characteristics directly influence physical health is a big part in health psychology and related fields (Smith, 2013). This information is often not dealt with completely when dealing with the insufficient attention to personality measurement. The ideal is that submission is a somewhat healthier stance than that of a dominate personality. The fear of rejections, negative evaluations and social anxieties are inversely associated with dominance. So the studies on dominance provide statistically significant disconfirming evidence regarding interpersonal sensitivity and cardiovascular disease. This information has been presented in a clear conceptual model of potentially important personality traits related to health (Smith, 2013). There is no substantial evidence that there is interpersonal sensitivity predicts the infectious diseases or cardiovascular disease. There is many concerns about the positives and negatives of this study due to the potential of convincing individuals that they have no control in their own health. The main purpose of this kind of study is to provide for useful tools. There is a certain amount of reading that is to be considered to be a potential issue as to if the personality characteristics directly influence the health of a person. A discussion on animal research is related to some of the hypothesis. In these studies a widely cited animal research is that in social behavior provide further evidence that dominance can promote cardiovascular disease. In male monkeys, the dominate male is put under a great deal of stress to deal with the whole group. There are also studies that prove the difference that being submissive in personality is a way to gain more cardiovascular disease.
Personality implications of adaption-innovation: v. birth order as a determination of cognitive style.
The first born child is the
PSY 8100 Theories of Personality
The hypothesis that personality characteristics directly influence physical health is a big part in health psychology and related fields (Smith, 2013). This information is often not dealt with completely when dealing with the insufficient attention to personality measurement. The ideal is that submission is a somewhat healthier stance than that of a dominate personality. The fear of rejections, negative evaluations and social anxieties are inversely associated with dominance. So the studies on dominance provide statistically significant disconfirming evidence regarding interpersonal sensitivity and cardiovascular disease. This information has been presented in a clear conceptual model of potentially important personality traits related to health (Smith, 2013). There is no substantial evidence that there is interpersonal sensitivity predicts the infectious diseases or cardiovascular disease. There is many concerns about the positives and negatives of this study due to the potential of convincing individuals that they have no control in their own health. The main purpose of this kind of study is to provide for useful tools. There is a certain amount of reading that is to be considered to be a potential issue as to if the personality characteristics directly influence the health of a person. A discussion on animal research is related to some of the hypothesis. In these studies a widely cited animal research is that in social behavior provide further evidence that dominance can promote cardiovascular disease. In male monkeys, the dominate male is put under a great deal of stress to deal with the whole group. There are also studies that prove the difference that being submissive in personality is a way to gain more cardiovascular disease.
Personality implications of adaption-innovation: v. birth order as a determination of cognitive style.
The first born child is the
References: Badger, J., & Reddy, P. (2009). The effects of birth order on personality traits and feelings of academic sibling rivalry. Psychology Teaching Review, 15 (1), 45-54 Dunkel, C. S., Harbke, C. R., & Papini, D. R. (2009). Direct and Indirect Effects of Birth Order on personality and Identity: Support for the Null Hypotthesis. The journal of Genetic Psychology , 2(170), 159-175 Krueger, R. F. (2010). Personality Pathology is Dimentioal, so what shall we do with the DSM-IV Personality Disorder Categories? The case of Personality Disorder Comment on Miller and Campbell (2010). , Personalty Disorders: Theories, Research and Treatment (1), 195-196. Skinner, N. F., & Fox-Francoeur, C. A. (2010). Personality implications of adaption-innovation: v. birth order as a determination of cognitive style. Social Behavior and Personality, 2010, 2(38), 237-240. Smith, T. W. (2013). Does the Interpersonally Sensitive Disposition Advance Research on Personality and Health? Commentt on Mariin and MIiller (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 985-990.