Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Compare and Contrast “Pax Romana”, “the Great Mongol Peace”, “Pax Britannica”, and “Pax Americana”.

Better Essays
1240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast “Pax Romana”, “the Great Mongol Peace”, “Pax Britannica”, and “Pax Americana”.
Compare and contrast “Pax Romana”, “The Great Mongol Peace”, “Pax Britannica”, and “Pax Americana”.

In studying Amy Chua’s “Day of Empire”, one finds a lot more similarities than differences shared among the great empires. Tolerance is a common theme that repeats itself over and over, and along with assimilation, unity, and acceptance, it is the glue that holds together these hyperpowers. But the path to the golden times of peace and glory and the strategic use of tolerance differs in each empire, and within the empire itself, from ruler to ruler. The Roman Empire enjoyed far more longevity than the Mongolian, British and American empires combined; two millennia[1] to be exact. Also, another unique feature of the Roman Empire was the idea of Rome, which was bigger than the empire itself, and an ambitious vision shared by most Roman Emperors. But let’s analyze the commonalities and differences among these four empires through three different lenses: political, economic and social. Political Analysis Rome learned from the history of ancient Greece that bigotry and ethnic divisions often led to war, and to avoid the tragic fate of its predecessor, Rome set a new standard for tolerance toward the foreign members of its empire, a strategy which transcended into the political system. There was an equal representation from “the savage and barbarous” nations to participate into the political process and share in the power and prestige of Rome[2], as long as these men were free Roman citizens and embraced the Roman values . Strategically, this was the most secure method of enlarging the empire. However, there were limits to this famed tolerance: women could not vote, hold office or wear the toga. During the Pax Romana, Trajan was the first ruler to implement a social legislation, creating a money lending program to the farmers, with the interest going to poor children[3]. Also, a unique feature of the Pax Romana was the use of diplomacy and threat of force to deter enemies, a philosophy that started with Antoninus Pius, and continued with the philosopher-king Marcus Aurelius. The political strategy under Pax Mongolica is similar with the Pax Romana, as it started out through carefully military expansion under Genghis Khan. But the Mongols stand out in history as ruthless fighters, who annexed territory one victory at a time, after killing the tribal leaders, and consolidating the remaining tribe members among their own members. In addition to consolidation, the Mongol army was re-arranged in such a way that each battalion was a mix of interethnic fighters, that were forced to defend each other as brothers. This intertribal, inter-ethnic system came to represent the makeup of the Mongol society as a whole. Unlike the Roman Empire, that throned leaders based on kinship, Temujin selected his closes advisors and army generals based on merit, talent and loyalty. Strategically, the Mongolian army was very different from the other armies as well; it consisted only on horsemen. This ensured mobility for the army and a quicker chance to strike. In addition, the Mongol army as the first one to use heavy technology and improve its warfare machine, by using the human capital of the annexed territories to their advantage. Even though the Mongol leaders were illiterate, they quickly came to value the power of science and knowledge, and promoted the Chinese engineers to design break-through arsenal for the army[4].At the height of its glory, the Pax Mongolica was by far the most populous nation in the world, with an estimated 110 to 120 million people[5] around the year 1276, under Khubilai’s rule. His style of government had a cosmopolitan approach; many government posts were shared by two people: a Chinese official and a foreigner, asked to govern together. In this aspect, this was very similar to the equal representation the Roman citizens enjoyed in their local governments. During Pax Britannica, the British Empire used tolerance as purely strategic calculation. The idea of being British transcended national and ethnic boundaries. At home, Great Britian had incorporated three different national identities as their own: English, Welsh and Scots. In addition, the Brits used to their advantage the financial support of the Sephardic Jews and Huguenots. However, outside its borders, Britain was not always tolerant . Their failure to include Ireland in the Empire, due to the two nations’ religious differences, has in retrospect been a great political loss. Similarly, the British always maintained an air of superiority toward the colonial populations they conquered, defining themselves as “white” and “civilized”[6]. This was mostly evident in their relationship with India, the jewel of the empire. Finally, the American system had three crucial features that were present in all the above-mentioned empires, which attracted people from diverse backgrounds: religious pluralism, a democratic system of government and a free market approach. As a result, the United States became at the time the world’s leading destination for newcomers, favored by religious prosecuted people and poor immigrants looking for economic opportunities. However, during the nineteenth century, America’s tolerance was rather selective. Natives were not sharing in the benefits of this strategic tolerance, and neither were women, who were completely excluded from any political and economic participation. In addition, slavery was in full swing for most of the century, until 1865 when it became abolished, and even then, racism would continue to be part of the American life until the civil movement of the 1960s. Despite America’s success as a regional power during this time, the moment to shine in the global arena and emerge as a global hegemon did not occur until the end of World War II. However, the time of peace would be short-lived, as the looming Cold War would polarize the power between the U.S. and Soviet Union. The American dominance would regain its status after the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, with U.S. becoming the sole superpower, both politically and economically. Politically, this was the first time in the history of humanity, when diplomacy replaced hard power and countries came together to form strategic alliances and institutions, in the spirit of cooperation, led by the United States. Economic and Social Analysis Pax Romana created the first model of a free trade economy. Roman provinces from Scotland to towns of West Africa freely traded together[7], without any barriers. In addition, import taxes between city states fell, as Rome consolidated its power. Rome developed a common currency to meet the commercial needs that arose from free trade, a fact which contributed more to the economic success of the empire. But free movement occurred not only among goods and capital, but also among people. Citizens were allowed to live and work in all provinces of the Roman Empire, with the exception of slaves and serfs[8]. Unlike the Roman Empire, this was anchored around metropolises, the Mongol nation did not have an established infrastructure. There were no towns or cities, only small tribal villages spread throughout the steppe. The conquest of China proved to be very lucrative for the Mongols, but the real treasure was the use of human capital. Genghis Khan brought from northern China engineers, soldiers, officers, scholars, artists, musicians, pharmacists, etc.

-----------------------
[1] Chua, pg. 31
[2] Chua, pg. 33
[3] Chua, pg. 37
[4] Chua, pg. 100
[5] Chua, pg. 116
[6] Chua, pg. 213
[7] Chua, pg. 31
[8] Chua, pg. 40

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the research/analysis novel Day of Empire, the author, Amy Chua, discusses her thesis of how hyperpowers (empires or nations that had a command that stretched to all corners of the known world in the known world of their respective times) all rose to dominance through tolerance and fell in power through intolerance. Through the introduction and Part One, Chua effectively communicates how the various hyperpowers of history all rose in might through their effective and strategic use of tolerance and acceptance of the different people that came to exist under their control. She also explains how the mighty empires fell through intolerance and lack of an overlying figurehead to which the people could become loyal to. From her research, she is able to support her thesis with the history of the great empires described in Part One.…

    • 2008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do the accounts of two Roman emperors reveal about the strategies leaders use to improve their institutions? In the first century BCE, Rome was struggling to govern effectively, take care of its citizens, and deal with bordering nations. Augustus came to power in 27 BCE and his reign oversaw the successful transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire (McKay 156). Just before his death in 14 CE, he wrote his autobiography, Res Gestae Divi Augusti, which details the impressive accomplishments of his long career. This text can be compared to an account of another Roman Emperor, Constantine, who served roughly 300 years later, from 306 to 312 CE. Roman historian Eusebius wrote a detailed biography of Constantine, called The Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine, and this essay will focus on his description of a significant event in Constantine’s life, his conversion to Christianity. Although Emperors Augustus and Constantine both strived for similar goals of uniting Rome and bringing it to the forefront of the world, these two accounts, Res Gestae Divi Augusti and the Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine, show that each ruler’s…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The empires in Rome and China were wildly successful in consolidating power and expanding their influence because they used a strong central government, technology, and cultural unity in spite of the fact that they were located on opposite sides of the globe. Thus it is evident that these factors are the most critical pieces to successful create strong…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Day of Empire Essay

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Day Of Empire, Amy Chua throughout the book explains the rises and falls of the most powerful hyper powers, large empires being able to maintain large areas while being stable in history. Her thesis of the book states tolerance was the rise and fall of the first empires in history. Where tolerance is the cause and decline of an empire. The empires had tolerance, Chua explains in her book that tolerance is the freedom of the people to do as they please and coexist with each other no matter the religion or even ethnical background which is what led to the rise of the empires. At the same time, tolerance led to the decline through the intolerance of the leaders as well as too much tolerance, where as the more a empire became diverse the harder it was to become unified and help fix problems. Intolerance where as leaders changed as time went on the more ignorant and greedy they became, they wanted things their way as well as to their standards. They set rules and made the people change their way of life which led to the fall of the hyperpower because of the rebellion of the people and other powers conquering.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire A. Comparison of Han and Roman Empires 1. Comparable size and scale a. Rome ruled lands along seacoasts b. Han ruled vast landmass 2. Both used violent conquest to unite empire B. Foundations of the Roman Empire 1. Reasons for the increasing power of Rome as city-state a. Migration of foreign peoples b. Roman military and political innovations 2.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crap it all

    • 4302 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Peace through authoritarian rule a. Emperors portrayed themselves as civil rulers b. Abuses of power c. Military as government D. Town and city life 1. Local administration through urban centers 2. Rome comparable only with Han capitals 3. Characteristics of life in Rome a. Emperor ensured citizens’ welfare b. Unsanitary 4.…

    • 4302 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nearly two thousand years ago, the Roman Empire conquered all territories west of the Persian Empire in modern day Iran and Iraq. The empire extended southwards into North Africa, and as far north as the British Isles. For close on to four centuries, the Romans controlled and conquered most of Western Eurasia and the Mediterranean. However, their rule came to an end because of the centrifugal forces of political and economic issues, foreign invaders and belligerent tribes, and socio-religious transformations. This brief response will help highlight the primary reasons why the Roman Empire fell.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons that allowed Rome was able to flourish was the generous giving of citizenship. That citizenship along with the factor of wealth decided a person social status. Slaves were not considered to have much worth socially. There was disparity of power between the rich and the poor. The rich were always wary of the gatherings of the poor, uneducated for fear of revolt.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Conclusion, the Roman Empire failed because of problems between the Patricians and Plebeians, the brutal and continuous military campaigns against the mighty Empire and the Rise Christianity. But, despite the Empire’s tragic fall, the Roman Empire left a legacy, as one of the most prosperous civilizations in several different subjects, influencing parts of Modern-Day…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Day of Empire Essay

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Empires have dominated our globe for centuries on, yet no one has linked the connection between how these empires rise, and what causes their reign to end. Through collective studies, Day Of Empire author Amy Chua presents a persuasive theory which argues that hyper powers achieved their world dominance through tolerance of culture and religion, as well as the individuals residing in the conquered society, amassing their talents for the benefit of the Empire.…

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout this semester, we have delved into the history of the civilizations that have inhabited the world spanning from 1453 to present day. Whether vicariously from the perspective of a person from that time period through a primary document, or by means of explanation by author Robert W. Strayer and in-class discussions, we have taken an in-depth look at various issues and events over the course of history. Although each event was significant on some scale, certain events had long lasting effects that could still be felt throughout the world today. Each country throughout history had their “moment in the sun” where they experienced power and global recognition. However, one country who has their footprint over most of history was…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1 Árnason, Jóhann Páll, and Kurt A. Raaflaub. 2011. The Roman Empire in context historical and 3…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome, one of the world’s greatest empires, was able to prosper in the Mediterranean world for centuries, yet, Rome’s downfall was inevitable. As Rome ascended into to power, the amount of territory they had became immensely vast. The Roman army had seized land from modern-day Scotland to Spain, and the entire Mediterranean Sea, along with colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Rome was able to harmoniously sustain their reign throughout the first two centuries, but they had slowly started staggering downward throughout the next three centuries. Rome’s problems had notably increased, they had started losing power, and eventually were overthrown. The primary cause for the Roman Empire’s fall was political instability.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays